| Message ID | 20180503142603.28513-4-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c index 7b5b40d6b70e..59049375bd19 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c @@ -503,11 +503,6 @@ dma_fence_wait_any_timeout(struct dma_fence **fences, uint32_t count, for (i = 0; i < count; ++i) { struct dma_fence *fence = fences[i]; - if (fence->ops->wait != dma_fence_default_wait) { - ret = -EINVAL; - goto fence_rm_cb; - } - cb[i].task = current; if (dma_fence_add_callback(fence, &cb[i].base, dma_fence_default_wait_cb)) {
When this was introduced in commit a519435a96597d8cd96123246fea4ae5a6c90b02 Author: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Date: Tue Oct 20 16:34:16 2015 +0200 dma-buf/fence: add fence_wait_any_timeout function v2 there was a restriction added that this only works if the dma-fence uses the dma_fence_default_wait hook. Which works for amdgpu, which is the only caller. Well, until you share some buffers with e.g. i915, then you get an -EINVAL. But there's really no reason for this, because all drivers must support callbacks. The special ->wait hook is only as an optimization; if the driver needs to create a worker thread for an active callback, then it can avoid to do that if it knows that there's a process context available already. So ->wait is just an optimization, just using the logic in dma_fence_default_wait() should work for all drivers. Let's remove this restriction. Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> --- drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)