Message ID | 20180606204724.26055-3-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Geert Uytterhoeven |
Headers | show |
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 10:47:22PM +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote: > From: Masaharu Hayakawa <masaharu.hayakawa.ry@renesas.com> > > SDR104 and HS200 need to check for SCC error. If SCC error is detected, > retuning is necessary. > > Signed-off-by: Masaharu Hayakawa <masaharu.hayakawa.ry@renesas.com> > [Niklas: update commit message] > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> It makes sense to me. We don't have a testcase to test this against, however :( How do other people test stuff like this? Rare error paths?
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c index e805f84b24a2def8..c1366df08e59a89b 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c @@ -906,8 +906,8 @@ static void tmio_mmc_finish_request(struct tmio_mmc_host *host) if (mrq->cmd->error || (mrq->data && mrq->data->error)) tmio_mmc_abort_dma(host); - if (host->check_scc_error) - host->check_scc_error(host); + if (host->check_scc_error && host->check_scc_error(host)) + mrq->cmd->error = -EILSEQ; /* If SET_BLOCK_COUNT, continue with main command */ if (host->mrq && !mrq->cmd->error) {