Message ID | 1532081841-2301-1-git-send-email-gujx@cn.fujitsu.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 2018年07月20日 18:17, Gu Jinxiang wrote: > chunk type BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA and BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA > should not be set in a non-mixed chunk at the same time. > > Since BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA is 0x4 and BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA is 0x1, > BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA will be 0x0, > so we should judge type is one of them separately. > > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> > Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Thanks, Qu > --- > Changelog: > v2: As comment by Qu, change the print format of bit from %llu to 0x%llx. > > fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 14 +++++++------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > index 3f2f01ad9356..d61c604b280c 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > @@ -6360,7 +6360,7 @@ static int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, > } > if (~(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) & > type) { > - btrfs_err(fs_info, "unrecognized chunk type: %llu", > + btrfs_err(fs_info, "unrecognized chunk type: 0x%llx", > ~(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK | > BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) & > btrfs_chunk_type(leaf, chunk)); > @@ -6368,14 +6368,14 @@ static int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, > } > > if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK) == 0) { > - btrfs_err(fs_info, "missing chunk type flag: %llu", type); > + btrfs_err(fs_info, "missing chunk type flag: 0x%llx", type); > return -EIO; > } > > if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM) && > (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA))) { > btrfs_err(fs_info, > - "system chunk with data or metadata type: %llu", type); > + "system chunk with data or metadata type: 0x%llx", type); > return -EIO; > } > > @@ -6384,10 +6384,10 @@ static int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, > mixed = 1; > > if (!mixed) { > - if (type & > - (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)) { > + if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA) && > + (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)) { > btrfs_err(fs_info, > - "mixed chunk type in non-mixed mode: %llu", type); > + "mixed chunk type in non-mixed mode: 0x%llx", type); > return -EIO; > } > } > @@ -6400,7 +6400,7 @@ static int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, > ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) == 0 && > num_stripes != 1)) { > btrfs_err(fs_info, > - "invalid num_stripes:sub_stripes %u:%u for profile %llu", > + "invalid num_stripes:sub_stripes %u:%u for profile 0x%llx", > num_stripes, sub_stripes, > type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK); > return -EIO; >
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index 3f2f01ad9356..d61c604b280c 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -6360,7 +6360,7 @@ static int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, } if (~(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) & type) { - btrfs_err(fs_info, "unrecognized chunk type: %llu", + btrfs_err(fs_info, "unrecognized chunk type: 0x%llx", ~(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) & btrfs_chunk_type(leaf, chunk)); @@ -6368,14 +6368,14 @@ static int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, } if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK) == 0) { - btrfs_err(fs_info, "missing chunk type flag: %llu", type); + btrfs_err(fs_info, "missing chunk type flag: 0x%llx", type); return -EIO; } if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM) && (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA))) { btrfs_err(fs_info, - "system chunk with data or metadata type: %llu", type); + "system chunk with data or metadata type: 0x%llx", type); return -EIO; } @@ -6384,10 +6384,10 @@ static int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, mixed = 1; if (!mixed) { - if (type & - (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)) { + if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA) && + (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)) { btrfs_err(fs_info, - "mixed chunk type in non-mixed mode: %llu", type); + "mixed chunk type in non-mixed mode: 0x%llx", type); return -EIO; } } @@ -6400,7 +6400,7 @@ static int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) == 0 && num_stripes != 1)) { btrfs_err(fs_info, - "invalid num_stripes:sub_stripes %u:%u for profile %llu", + "invalid num_stripes:sub_stripes %u:%u for profile 0x%llx", num_stripes, sub_stripes, type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK); return -EIO;
chunk type BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA and BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA should not be set in a non-mixed chunk at the same time. Since BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA is 0x4 and BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA is 0x1, BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA will be 0x0, so we should judge type is one of them separately. Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com> --- Changelog: v2: As comment by Qu, change the print format of bit from %llu to 0x%llx. fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)