Message ID | 20180725141610.12075-1-otubo@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 25 July 2018 at 15:16, Eduardo Otubo <otubo@redhat.com> wrote: > The following changes since commit 18a398f6a39df4b08ff86ac0d38384193ca5f4cc: > > Update version for v3.0.0-rc2 release (2018-07-24 22:06:31 +0100) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > https://github.com/otubo/qemu.git tags/pull-seccomp-20180725 > > for you to fetch changes up to 5b2f59307372bae13a2ff95706646674eccb65e0: > > RFC: seccomp: prefer SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS if available (2018-07-25 16:07:31 +0200) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > pull-seccomp-20180725 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Marc-André Lureau (2): > seccomp: use SIGSYS signal instead of killing the thread > RFC: seccomp: prefer SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS if available Hi. This fails to compile with clang: CC qemu-seccomp.o qemu-seccomp.c:112:1: error: unused function 'qemu_seccomp' [-Werror,-Wunused-function] qemu_seccomp(unsigned int operation, unsigned int flags, void *args) ^ This is because clang is stricter about warning about static inline functions defined in .c files but never used and your ifdef guard on the callsite is not matched by one around the function definition. thanks -- PMM
On 26/07/2018 - 11:47:46, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 25 July 2018 at 15:16, Eduardo Otubo <otubo@redhat.com> wrote: > > The following changes since commit 18a398f6a39df4b08ff86ac0d38384193ca5f4cc: > > > > Update version for v3.0.0-rc2 release (2018-07-24 22:06:31 +0100) > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > https://github.com/otubo/qemu.git tags/pull-seccomp-20180725 > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 5b2f59307372bae13a2ff95706646674eccb65e0: > > > > RFC: seccomp: prefer SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS if available (2018-07-25 16:07:31 +0200) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > pull-seccomp-20180725 > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Marc-André Lureau (2): > > seccomp: use SIGSYS signal instead of killing the thread > > RFC: seccomp: prefer SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS if available > > Hi. This fails to compile with clang: > > CC qemu-seccomp.o > qemu-seccomp.c:112:1: error: unused function 'qemu_seccomp' > [-Werror,-Wunused-function] > qemu_seccomp(unsigned int operation, unsigned int flags, void *args) > ^ > > This is because clang is stricter about warning about static inline > functions defined in .c files but never used and your ifdef > guard on the callsite is not matched by one around the function > definition. > Peter, sorry for not catching that before. Marc, can you fix and resend?
Hi On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:47 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote: > On 25 July 2018 at 15:16, Eduardo Otubo <otubo@redhat.com> wrote: >> The following changes since commit 18a398f6a39df4b08ff86ac0d38384193ca5f4cc: >> >> Update version for v3.0.0-rc2 release (2018-07-24 22:06:31 +0100) >> >> are available in the Git repository at: >> >> https://github.com/otubo/qemu.git tags/pull-seccomp-20180725 >> >> for you to fetch changes up to 5b2f59307372bae13a2ff95706646674eccb65e0: >> >> RFC: seccomp: prefer SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS if available (2018-07-25 16:07:31 +0200) >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> pull-seccomp-20180725 >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Marc-André Lureau (2): >> seccomp: use SIGSYS signal instead of killing the thread >> RFC: seccomp: prefer SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS if available > > Hi. This fails to compile with clang: > > CC qemu-seccomp.o > qemu-seccomp.c:112:1: error: unused function 'qemu_seccomp' > [-Werror,-Wunused-function] > qemu_seccomp(unsigned int operation, unsigned int flags, void *args) > ^ > > This is because clang is stricter about warning about static inline > functions defined in .c files but never used and your ifdef > guard on the callsite is not matched by one around the function > definition. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/6/6/631 ;)
H On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Eduardo Otubo <otubo@redhat.com> wrote: > On 26/07/2018 - 11:47:46, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 25 July 2018 at 15:16, Eduardo Otubo <otubo@redhat.com> wrote: >> > The following changes since commit 18a398f6a39df4b08ff86ac0d38384193ca5f4cc: >> > >> > Update version for v3.0.0-rc2 release (2018-07-24 22:06:31 +0100) >> > >> > are available in the Git repository at: >> > >> > https://github.com/otubo/qemu.git tags/pull-seccomp-20180725 >> > >> > for you to fetch changes up to 5b2f59307372bae13a2ff95706646674eccb65e0: >> > >> > RFC: seccomp: prefer SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS if available (2018-07-25 16:07:31 +0200) >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> > pull-seccomp-20180725 >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> > Marc-André Lureau (2): >> > seccomp: use SIGSYS signal instead of killing the thread >> > RFC: seccomp: prefer SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS if available >> >> Hi. This fails to compile with clang: >> >> CC qemu-seccomp.o >> qemu-seccomp.c:112:1: error: unused function 'qemu_seccomp' >> [-Werror,-Wunused-function] >> qemu_seccomp(unsigned int operation, unsigned int flags, void *args) >> ^ >> >> This is because clang is stricter about warning about static inline >> functions defined in .c files but never used and your ifdef >> guard on the callsite is not matched by one around the function >> definition. >> > > Peter, sorry for not catching that before. > Marc, can you fix and resend? I suggest to drop that patch from 3.0. Since it will require a newer libseccomp to be actually useful, it can be delayed imho.