From patchwork Wed Sep 5 03:07:33 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Su Yue X-Patchwork-Id: 10588203 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E0314E0 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 03:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB49829924 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 03:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id AE56729961; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 03:00:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5645429924 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 03:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726474AbeIEH2t (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2018 03:28:49 -0400 Received: from mail.cn.fujitsu.com ([183.91.158.132]:58461 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725825AbeIEH2t (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2018 03:28:49 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,368,1503331200"; d="scan'208";a="44475104" Received: from unknown (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 05 Sep 2018 11:00:49 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXCHPEKD03.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.85]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674534B5CBE6 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 11:00:45 +0800 (CST) Received: from archlinux.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.226.31) by G08CNEXCHPEKD03.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 11:00:45 +0800 From: Su Yue To: CC: Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: defrag: use btrfs_mod_outstanding_extents in cluster_pages_for_defrag Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 11:07:33 +0800 Message-ID: <20180905030733.29720-1-suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.167.226.31] X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: 674534B5CBE6.A9B0B X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Since commit 8b62f87bad9c ("Btrfs: rework outstanding_extents"), manual operations of outstanding_extent in btrfs_inode are replaced by btrfs_mod_outstanding_extents(). The one in cluster_pages_for_defrag seems to be lost, so replace it of btrfs_mod_outstanding_extents(). Fixes: 8b62f87bad9c ("Btrfs: rework outstanding_extents") Signed-off-by: Su Yue Reviewed-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c index 63600dc2ac4c..c180ded27092 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c @@ -1308,7 +1308,7 @@ static int cluster_pages_for_defrag(struct inode *inode, if (i_done != page_cnt) { spin_lock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->lock); - BTRFS_I(inode)->outstanding_extents++; + btrfs_mod_outstanding_extents(BTRFS_I(inode), 1); spin_unlock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->lock); btrfs_delalloc_release_space(inode, data_reserved, start_index << PAGE_SHIFT,