diff mbox series

[v2,1/2] seq_buf: Make seq_buf_puts() null-terminate the buffer

Message ID 20181019042109.8064-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v2,1/2] seq_buf: Make seq_buf_puts() null-terminate the buffer | expand

Commit Message

Michael Ellerman Oct. 19, 2018, 4:21 a.m. UTC
Currently seq_buf_puts() will happily create a non null-terminated
string for you in the buffer. This is particularly dangerous if the
buffer is on the stack.

For example:

  char buf[8];
  char secret = "secret";
  struct seq_buf s;

  seq_buf_init(&s, buf, sizeof(buf));
  seq_buf_puts(&s, "foo");
  printk("Message is %s\n", buf);

Can result in:

  Message is fooªªªªªsecret

We could require all users to memset() their buffer to zero before
use. But that seems likely to be forgotten and lead to bugs.

Instead we can change seq_buf_puts() to always leave the buffer in a
null-terminated state.

The only downside is that this makes the buffer 1 character smaller
for seq_buf_puts(), but that seems like a good trade off.

Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
---
 lib/seq_buf.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

v2: Fix NULL/null terminology.

Comments

Michael Ellerman Dec. 12, 2018, 11:21 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Steve,

Friendly ping :)

Do you mind picking this one up for 4.21 ?

cheers

Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> writes:
> Currently seq_buf_puts() will happily create a non null-terminated
> string for you in the buffer. This is particularly dangerous if the
> buffer is on the stack.
>
> For example:
>
>   char buf[8];
>   char secret = "secret";
>   struct seq_buf s;
>
>   seq_buf_init(&s, buf, sizeof(buf));
>   seq_buf_puts(&s, "foo");
>   printk("Message is %s\n", buf);
>
> Can result in:
>
>   Message is fooªªªªªsecret
>
> We could require all users to memset() their buffer to zero before
> use. But that seems likely to be forgotten and lead to bugs.
>
> Instead we can change seq_buf_puts() to always leave the buffer in a
> null-terminated state.
>
> The only downside is that this makes the buffer 1 character smaller
> for seq_buf_puts(), but that seems like a good trade off.
>
> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> ---
>  lib/seq_buf.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> v2: Fix NULL/null terminology.
>
> diff --git a/lib/seq_buf.c b/lib/seq_buf.c
> index 11f2ae0f9099..6aabb609dd87 100644
> --- a/lib/seq_buf.c
> +++ b/lib/seq_buf.c
> @@ -144,9 +144,13 @@ int seq_buf_puts(struct seq_buf *s, const char *str)
>  
>  	WARN_ON(s->size == 0);
>  
> +	/* Add 1 to len for the trailing null byte which must be there */
> +	len += 1;
> +
>  	if (seq_buf_can_fit(s, len)) {
>  		memcpy(s->buffer + s->len, str, len);
> -		s->len += len;
> +		/* Don't count the trailing null byte against the capacity */
> +		s->len += len - 1;
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  	seq_buf_set_overflow(s);
> -- 
> 2.17.2
Steven Rostedt Dec. 12, 2018, 1:45 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:21:46 +1100
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:

> Hi Steve,
> 
> Friendly ping :)
> 
> Do you mind picking this one up for 4.21 ?
> 
>

Thanks for the reminder, I've been swamped lately. I'll take a look now.


-- Steve
Steven Rostedt Dec. 12, 2018, 1:50 p.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 08:45:32 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:21:46 +1100
> Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Steve,
> > 
> > Friendly ping :)
> > 
> > Do you mind picking this one up for 4.21 ?
> > 
> >  
> 
> Thanks for the reminder, I've been swamped lately. I'll take a look now.
> 
>

OK, I applied both to my local queue, and it will reach linux-next
probably some time at the end of this week or early next week. It needs
to wait till I'm ready to run my local changes through my test suite.

Thanks!

-- Steve
Michael Ellerman Dec. 18, 2018, 3:58 a.m. UTC | #4
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> writes:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 08:45:32 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:21:46 +1100
>> Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>> 
>> > Hi Steve,
>> > 
>> > Friendly ping :)
>> > 
>> > Do you mind picking this one up for 4.21 ?
>> > 
>> >  
>> 
>> Thanks for the reminder, I've been swamped lately. I'll take a look now.
>> 
>
> OK, I applied both to my local queue, and it will reach linux-next
> probably some time at the end of this week or early next week. It needs
> to wait till I'm ready to run my local changes through my test suite.

Sure, no rush. Thanks.

cheers
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/lib/seq_buf.c b/lib/seq_buf.c
index 11f2ae0f9099..6aabb609dd87 100644
--- a/lib/seq_buf.c
+++ b/lib/seq_buf.c
@@ -144,9 +144,13 @@  int seq_buf_puts(struct seq_buf *s, const char *str)
 
 	WARN_ON(s->size == 0);
 
+	/* Add 1 to len for the trailing null byte which must be there */
+	len += 1;
+
 	if (seq_buf_can_fit(s, len)) {
 		memcpy(s->buffer + s->len, str, len);
-		s->len += len;
+		/* Don't count the trailing null byte against the capacity */
+		s->len += len - 1;
 		return 0;
 	}
 	seq_buf_set_overflow(s);