| Message ID | 20181021200048.2114-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Delegated to: | Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Headers | show |
| Series | spi: simplify getting .driver_data | expand |
Hi Wolfram, On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 10:03 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> wrote: > We should get 'driver_data' from 'struct device' directly. Going via > platform_device is an unneeded step back and forth. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> > --- > > Build tested only. buildbot is happy. How disappointing, you do have a Lager ;-) Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c index 55f8e55327b3..a4ef641b5227 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c @@ -1347,16 +1347,14 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, spi_driver_ids); #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP static int rspi_suspend(struct device *dev) { - struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); - struct rspi_data *rspi = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct rspi_data *rspi = dev_get_drvdata(dev); return spi_master_suspend(rspi->master); } static int rspi_resume(struct device *dev) { - struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); - struct rspi_data *rspi = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct rspi_data *rspi = dev_get_drvdata(dev); return spi_master_resume(rspi->master); }
We should get 'driver_data' from 'struct device' directly. Going via platform_device is an unneeded step back and forth. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> --- Build tested only. buildbot is happy. drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)