| Message ID | 20181129174700.16585-14-ulf.hansson@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Deferred |
| Headers | show |
| Series | PM / Domains: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement (PSCI/ARM) | expand |
On 29/11/2018 18:46, Ulf Hansson wrote: > From: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org> > > Currently CPU's idle states are represented in a flattened model, via the > "cpu-idle-states" binding from within the CPU's device nodes. > > Support the hierarchical layout, simply by converting to calling the new OF > helper, of_get_cpu_state_node(). > > Cc: Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org> > Suggested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org> > Co-developed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> > --- Fold it with 07/27 ? > > Changes in v10: > - None. > > --- > drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c > index cbfc936d251c..631e20720a22 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c > @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static int psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, > return -ENOMEM; > > for (i = 0; i < num_state_nodes; i++) { > - state_node = of_parse_phandle(cpu_node, "cpu-idle-states", i); > + state_node = of_get_cpu_state_node(cpu_node, i); > if (!state_node) > break; > >
On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 13:11, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 29/11/2018 18:46, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > From: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org> > > > > Currently CPU's idle states are represented in a flattened model, via the > > "cpu-idle-states" binding from within the CPU's device nodes. > > > > Support the hierarchical layout, simply by converting to calling the new OF > > helper, of_get_cpu_state_node(). > > > > Cc: Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org> > > Suggested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > > Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org> > > Co-developed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> > > --- > > Fold it with 07/27 ? I can do that. However, normally we try to keep changes that touches different subsystems, separate from each other. Of course sometimes it's not possible and sometimes it just doesn't make sense to separate changes. Perhaps the PSCI maintainers and Rafael can give their opinion. Kind regards Uffe > > > > > Changes in v10: > > - None. > > > > --- > > drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c > > index cbfc936d251c..631e20720a22 100644 > > --- a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c > > @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static int psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > for (i = 0; i < num_state_nodes; i++) { > > - state_node = of_parse_phandle(cpu_node, "cpu-idle-states", i); > > + state_node = of_get_cpu_state_node(cpu_node, i); > > if (!state_node) > > break; > > > > > > > -- > <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs > > Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | > <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | > <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog >
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c index cbfc936d251c..631e20720a22 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static int psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, return -ENOMEM; for (i = 0; i < num_state_nodes; i++) { - state_node = of_parse_phandle(cpu_node, "cpu-idle-states", i); + state_node = of_get_cpu_state_node(cpu_node, i); if (!state_node) break;