@@ -680,6 +680,8 @@ nv50_msto_payload(struct nv50_msto *msto)
struct nv50_mstm *mstm = mstc->mstm;
int vcpi = mstc->port->vcpi.vcpi, i;
+ WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&mstm->mgr.payload_lock));
+
NV_ATOMIC(drm, "%s: vcpi %d\n", msto->encoder.name, vcpi);
for (i = 0; i < mstm->mgr.max_payloads; i++) {
struct drm_dp_payload *payload = &mstm->mgr.payloads[i];
@@ -733,6 +735,8 @@ nv50_msto_prepare(struct nv50_msto *msto)
(0x0100 << msto->head->base.index),
};
+ mutex_lock(&mstm->mgr.payload_lock);
+
NV_ATOMIC(drm, "%s: msto prepare\n", msto->encoder.name);
if (mstc->port->vcpi.vcpi > 0) {
struct drm_dp_payload *payload = nv50_msto_payload(msto);
@@ -748,7 +752,9 @@ nv50_msto_prepare(struct nv50_msto *msto)
msto->encoder.name, msto->head->base.base.name,
args.vcpi.start_slot, args.vcpi.num_slots,
args.vcpi.pbn, args.vcpi.aligned_pbn);
+
nvif_mthd(&drm->display->disp.object, 0, &args, sizeof(args));
+ mutex_unlock(&mstm->mgr.payload_lock);
}
static int
Going through the currently programmed payloads isn't safe without holding mgr->payload_lock, so actually do that and warn if anyone tries calling nv50_msto_payload() in the future without grabbing the right locks. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)