Message ID | 20181214194541.21891-1-fdmanana@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Btrfs: do not overwrite error return value in the balance ioctl | expand |
On 12/15/2018 03:45 AM, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote: > From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> > > If the call to btrfs_balance() failed we would overwrite the error > returned to user space with -EFAULT if the call to copy_to_user() failed > as well. Fix that by calling copy_to_user() only if btrfs_balance() > returned success. > > Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c > index abe45fd97ab5..4ad7288f77d0 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c > @@ -4707,7 +4707,7 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_balance(struct file *file, void __user *arg) > ret = btrfs_balance(fs_info, bctl, bargs); > bctl = NULL; > > - if (arg) { > + if (ret == 0 && arg) { > if (copy_to_user(arg, bargs, sizeof(*bargs))) > ret = -EFAULT; > } > This changes the BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE_V2 semantics. Originally, if BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE_V2 is failed/canceled we do update bargs [1] and copy to user land, but after this patch we copy only if the ioctl is successful. I doubt if David is OK with that. [1] ---------- 3717 int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, 3718 struct btrfs_balance_control *bctl, 3719 struct btrfs_ioctl_balance_args *bargs) 3720 { :: 3855 ret = __btrfs_balance(fs_info); 3856 3857 mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex); 3858 clear_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags); 3859 3860 if (bargs) { 3861 memset(bargs, 0, sizeof(*bargs)); 3862 btrfs_update_ioctl_balance_args(fs_info, bargs); 3863 }
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 8:25 AM Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> wrote: > > > > On 12/15/2018 03:45 AM, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote: > > From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> > > > > If the call to btrfs_balance() failed we would overwrite the error > > returned to user space with -EFAULT if the call to copy_to_user() failed > > as well. Fix that by calling copy_to_user() only if btrfs_balance() > > returned success. > > > > Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> > > --- > > fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c > > index abe45fd97ab5..4ad7288f77d0 100644 > > --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c > > +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c > > @@ -4707,7 +4707,7 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_balance(struct file *file, void __user *arg) > > ret = btrfs_balance(fs_info, bctl, bargs); > > bctl = NULL; > > > > - if (arg) { > > + if (ret == 0 && arg) { > > if (copy_to_user(arg, bargs, sizeof(*bargs))) > > ret = -EFAULT; > > } > > > > This changes the BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE_V2 semantics. > > Originally, if BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE_V2 is failed/canceled we do update > bargs [1] and copy to user land, but after this patch we copy only > if the ioctl is successful. I doubt if David is OK with that. I thought about that. But that logic, if it's really in use by someone (something) out there then they must be treating -EFAULT differently from any other error. Because if copy_to_user() fails it means it didn't copy all bytes it was so supposed to (its return value is number of bytes not copied), so the arguments structure ends up in an inconsistent state. > > [1] > ---------- > 3717 int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, > 3718 struct btrfs_balance_control *bctl, > 3719 struct btrfs_ioctl_balance_args *bargs) > 3720 { > :: > > 3855 ret = __btrfs_balance(fs_info); > 3856 > 3857 mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex); > 3858 clear_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags); > 3859 > 3860 if (bargs) { > 3861 memset(bargs, 0, sizeof(*bargs)); > 3862 btrfs_update_ioctl_balance_args(fs_info, bargs); > 3863 } >
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 09:24:43AM +0000, Filipe Manana wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 8:25 AM Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 12/15/2018 03:45 AM, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote: > > > From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> > > > > > > If the call to btrfs_balance() failed we would overwrite the error > > > returned to user space with -EFAULT if the call to copy_to_user() failed > > > as well. Fix that by calling copy_to_user() only if btrfs_balance() > > > returned success. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> > > > --- > > > fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c > > > index abe45fd97ab5..4ad7288f77d0 100644 > > > --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c > > > +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c > > > @@ -4707,7 +4707,7 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_balance(struct file *file, void __user *arg) > > > ret = btrfs_balance(fs_info, bctl, bargs); > > > bctl = NULL; > > > > > > - if (arg) { > > > + if (ret == 0 && arg) { > > > if (copy_to_user(arg, bargs, sizeof(*bargs))) > > > ret = -EFAULT; > > > } > > > > > > > This changes the BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE_V2 semantics. > > > > Originally, if BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE_V2 is failed/canceled we do update > > bargs [1] and copy to user land, but after this patch we copy only > > if the ioctl is successful. I doubt if David is OK with that. > > I thought about that. But that logic, if it's really in use by someone > (something) out there then they must be treating -EFAULT differently > from any other error. > Because if copy_to_user() fails it means it didn't copy all bytes it > was so supposed to (its return value is number of bytes not copied), > so the arguments structure ends up in an inconsistent state. The balance ioctl as used in btrfs-progs expects valid contents of the bargs even if the ioctl returns negative value, with errno set to ECANCELED: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/blob/master/cmds-balance.c#L458 So the condition would need to take that into account if ((ret == 0 || ret == -ECANCELED) && arg) I haven't found any other error that would need to be whitelisted here.
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c index abe45fd97ab5..4ad7288f77d0 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c @@ -4707,7 +4707,7 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_balance(struct file *file, void __user *arg) ret = btrfs_balance(fs_info, bctl, bargs); bctl = NULL; - if (arg) { + if (ret == 0 && arg) { if (copy_to_user(arg, bargs, sizeof(*bargs))) ret = -EFAULT; }