Message ID | 2ae45b9263f51a14a7f672f40da2193caf174971.1547458732.git.amit.kucheria@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Delegated to: | Andy Gross |
Headers | show |
Series | Thermal throttling for SDM845 | expand |
On 14-01-19, 15:51, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> (Resent to allow people testing the series to test it easily)
Maybe just share your branch then, instead of sending this again ?
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c index d83939a1b3d4..649dddd72749 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ static int __init qcom_cpufreq_hw_init(void) { return platform_driver_register(&qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver); } -subsys_initcall(qcom_cpufreq_hw_init); +device_initcall(qcom_cpufreq_hw_init); static void __exit qcom_cpufreq_hw_exit(void) {
(Resent to allow people testing the series to test it easily) subsys_initcall causes problems registering the driver as a thermal cooling device. If "faster boot" is the main reason for doing subsys_initcall, this should be handled in the bootloader or another boot constraint framework. Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org> --- drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)