diff mbox series

[2/3] security: keys: annotate implicit fall throughs

Message ID 20190114201725.13289-2-malat@debian.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [1/3] security: keys: annotate implicit fall through | expand

Commit Message

Mathieu Malaterre Jan. 14, 2019, 8:17 p.m. UTC 
There is a plan to build the kernel with -Wimplicit-fallthrough and
these places in the code produced warnings (W=1). Fix them up.

This commit remove the following warning:

  security/keys/process_keys.c:380:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
  security/keys/process_keys.c:404:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
  security/keys/process_keys.c:424:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
---
 security/keys/process_keys.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/security/keys/process_keys.c b/security/keys/process_keys.c
index 02c77e928f68..3308d738734c 100644
--- a/security/keys/process_keys.c
+++ b/security/keys/process_keys.c
@@ -379,6 +379,7 @@  key_ref_t search_my_process_keyrings(struct keyring_search_context *ctx)
 		case -EAGAIN: /* no key */
 			if (ret)
 				break;
+			/* fall through */
 		case -ENOKEY: /* negative key */
 			ret = key_ref;
 			break;
@@ -403,6 +404,7 @@  key_ref_t search_my_process_keyrings(struct keyring_search_context *ctx)
 		case -EAGAIN: /* no key */
 			if (ret)
 				break;
+			/* fall through */
 		case -ENOKEY: /* negative key */
 			ret = key_ref;
 			break;
@@ -423,6 +425,7 @@  key_ref_t search_my_process_keyrings(struct keyring_search_context *ctx)
 		case -EAGAIN: /* no key */
 			if (ret)
 				break;
+			/* fall through */
 		case -ENOKEY: /* negative key */
 			ret = key_ref;
 			break;