@@ -142,41 +142,31 @@ xfs_dir3_leaf_check_int(
*/
static xfs_failaddr_t
xfs_dir3_leaf_verify(
- struct xfs_buf *bp,
- uint16_t magic)
+ struct xfs_buf *bp)
{
struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
struct xfs_dir2_leaf *leaf = bp->b_addr;
- ASSERT(magic == XFS_DIR2_LEAF1_MAGIC || magic == XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC);
+ if (!xfs_verify_magic(bp, leaf->hdr.info.magic))
+ return __this_address;
if (xfs_sb_version_hascrc(&mp->m_sb)) {
struct xfs_dir3_leaf_hdr *leaf3 = bp->b_addr;
- uint16_t magic3;
- magic3 = (magic == XFS_DIR2_LEAF1_MAGIC) ? XFS_DIR3_LEAF1_MAGIC
- : XFS_DIR3_LEAFN_MAGIC;
-
- if (leaf3->info.hdr.magic != cpu_to_be16(magic3))
- return __this_address;
if (!uuid_equal(&leaf3->info.uuid, &mp->m_sb.sb_meta_uuid))
return __this_address;
if (be64_to_cpu(leaf3->info.blkno) != bp->b_bn)
return __this_address;
if (!xfs_log_check_lsn(mp, be64_to_cpu(leaf3->info.lsn)))
return __this_address;
- } else {
- if (leaf->hdr.info.magic != cpu_to_be16(magic))
- return __this_address;
}
return xfs_dir3_leaf_check_int(mp, NULL, NULL, leaf);
}
static void
-__read_verify(
- struct xfs_buf *bp,
- uint16_t magic)
+xfs_dir3_leaf_read_verify(
+ struct xfs_buf *bp)
{
struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
xfs_failaddr_t fa;
@@ -185,23 +175,22 @@ __read_verify(
!xfs_buf_verify_cksum(bp, XFS_DIR3_LEAF_CRC_OFF))
xfs_verifier_error(bp, -EFSBADCRC, __this_address);
else {
- fa = xfs_dir3_leaf_verify(bp, magic);
+ fa = xfs_dir3_leaf_verify(bp);
if (fa)
xfs_verifier_error(bp, -EFSCORRUPTED, fa);
}
}
static void
-__write_verify(
- struct xfs_buf *bp,
- uint16_t magic)
+xfs_dir3_leaf_write_verify(
+ struct xfs_buf *bp)
{
struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
struct xfs_buf_log_item *bip = bp->b_log_item;
struct xfs_dir3_leaf_hdr *hdr3 = bp->b_addr;
xfs_failaddr_t fa;
- fa = xfs_dir3_leaf_verify(bp, magic);
+ fa = xfs_dir3_leaf_verify(bp);
if (fa) {
xfs_verifier_error(bp, -EFSCORRUPTED, fa);
return;
@@ -216,60 +205,22 @@ __write_verify(
xfs_buf_update_cksum(bp, XFS_DIR3_LEAF_CRC_OFF);
}
-static xfs_failaddr_t
-xfs_dir3_leaf1_verify(
- struct xfs_buf *bp)
-{
- return xfs_dir3_leaf_verify(bp, XFS_DIR2_LEAF1_MAGIC);
-}
-
-static void
-xfs_dir3_leaf1_read_verify(
- struct xfs_buf *bp)
-{
- __read_verify(bp, XFS_DIR2_LEAF1_MAGIC);
-}
-
-static void
-xfs_dir3_leaf1_write_verify(
- struct xfs_buf *bp)
-{
- __write_verify(bp, XFS_DIR2_LEAF1_MAGIC);
-}
-
-static xfs_failaddr_t
-xfs_dir3_leafn_verify(
- struct xfs_buf *bp)
-{
- return xfs_dir3_leaf_verify(bp, XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC);
-}
-
-static void
-xfs_dir3_leafn_read_verify(
- struct xfs_buf *bp)
-{
- __read_verify(bp, XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC);
-}
-
-static void
-xfs_dir3_leafn_write_verify(
- struct xfs_buf *bp)
-{
- __write_verify(bp, XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC);
-}
-
const struct xfs_buf_ops xfs_dir3_leaf1_buf_ops = {
.name = "xfs_dir3_leaf1",
- .verify_read = xfs_dir3_leaf1_read_verify,
- .verify_write = xfs_dir3_leaf1_write_verify,
- .verify_struct = xfs_dir3_leaf1_verify,
+ .magic = { cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAF1_MAGIC),
+ cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR3_LEAF1_MAGIC) },
+ .verify_read = xfs_dir3_leaf_read_verify,
+ .verify_write = xfs_dir3_leaf_write_verify,
+ .verify_struct = xfs_dir3_leaf_verify,
};
const struct xfs_buf_ops xfs_dir3_leafn_buf_ops = {
.name = "xfs_dir3_leafn",
- .verify_read = xfs_dir3_leafn_read_verify,
- .verify_write = xfs_dir3_leafn_write_verify,
- .verify_struct = xfs_dir3_leafn_verify,
+ .magic = { cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC),
+ cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR3_LEAFN_MAGIC) },
+ .verify_read = xfs_dir3_leaf_read_verify,
+ .verify_write = xfs_dir3_leaf_write_verify,
+ .verify_struct = xfs_dir3_leaf_verify,
};
int
The dir2 leaf verifiers share the same underlying structure verification code, but implement six accessor functions to multiplex the code across the two verifiers. Further, the magic value isn't sufficiently abstracted such that the common helper has to manually fix up the magic from the caller on v5 filesystems. Use the magic field in the verifier structure to eliminate the duplicate code and clean this all up. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> --- This v4.1 update drops the compile-time magic value offset checks. Rather than attempt to retrofit the original asserts into the xfs_ondisk.h infrastructure, it's probably more appropriate to add some checks that ensure the v4 headers land at the expected offset of the v5 extended variants (where appropriate). This is outside the scope of this series. Brian fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c | 87 ++++++++--------------------------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)