diff mbox series

drm/i915/icl: Remove alpha support protection

Message ID 20190305221153.359-1-jose.souza@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series drm/i915/icl: Remove alpha support protection | expand

Commit Message

Souza, Jose March 5, 2019, 10:11 p.m. UTC
Now with the watermarks fixes merged, Icelake is stable enough to
have the alpha support protection flag removed.

We have a few ICL machines in our CI and it is mostly green with
failures in tests that will not impact future linux installations.
Also there is no warnings, errors, flickering or any visual defects
while doing ordinary tasks like browsing and editing documents in a
dual monitor setup.

As a reminder i915.alpha_support was created to protect
future linux installation's iso images that might contain a
kernel from the enabling time of the new platform. Without this
protection most of linux installation was recommending
nomodeset option during installation that was getting stick
there after installation.

Specifically, alpha support says nothing about the development
state of the hardware, and everything about the state of the
driver in a kernel release.

This is semantically no different from the old
preliminary_hw_support flag, but the old one was all too often
interpreted as (preliminary hw) support instead of the intended
(preliminary) hw support, and it was misleading for everyone.
Hence the rename.

Reference: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/fi-icl-y.html
Reference: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/shard-iclb.html
Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Saarinen <jani.saarinen@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Rodrigo Vivi March 5, 2019, 11:21 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 02:11:53PM -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> Now with the watermarks fixes merged, Icelake is stable enough to
> have the alpha support protection flag removed.
> 
> We have a few ICL machines in our CI and it is mostly green with
> failures in tests that will not impact future linux installations.
> Also there is no warnings, errors, flickering or any visual defects
> while doing ordinary tasks like browsing and editing documents in a
> dual monitor setup.
> 
> As a reminder i915.alpha_support was created to protect
> future linux installation's iso images that might contain a
> kernel from the enabling time of the new platform. Without this
> protection most of linux installation was recommending
> nomodeset option during installation that was getting stick
> there after installation.
> 
> Specifically, alpha support says nothing about the development
> state of the hardware, and everything about the state of the
> driver in a kernel release.
> 
> This is semantically no different from the old
> preliminary_hw_support flag, but the old one was all too often
> interpreted as (preliminary hw) support instead of the intended
> (preliminary) hw support, and it was misleading for everyone.
> Hence the rename.
> 
> Reference: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/fi-icl-y.html

This view is great. It is unfortunate we cannot save this and
this link will be invalid in few runs.

> Reference: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/shard-iclb.html

This picture doesn't help, but taking your word, and the BAT results
and quoting Jani Saarinen: "Nice improvement here what comes to passes..."

Old: f2-icl-u         total:262  pass:107  dwarn:98  dfail:0   fail:1   skip:55  time:429s
f2-icl-u         total:263  pass:222  dwarn:9   dfail:0   fail:3   skip:29  time:339s

Old: f2-icl-y         total:262  pass:105  dwarn:98  dfail:0   fail:4   skip:54  time:430s
f2-icl-y         total:476  pass:225  dwarn:7   dfail:0   fail:4   skip:240 time:470s

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

> Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Saarinen <jani.saarinen@intel.com>
> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> index c42c5ccf38fe..527bd1ceb9ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> @@ -658,7 +658,6 @@ static const struct intel_device_info intel_cannonlake_info = {
>  static const struct intel_device_info intel_icelake_11_info = {
>  	GEN11_FEATURES,
>  	PLATFORM(INTEL_ICELAKE),
> -	.is_alpha_support = 1,
>  	.engine_mask =
>  		BIT(RCS0) | BIT(BCS0) | BIT(VECS0) | BIT(VCS0) | BIT(VCS2),
>  };
> -- 
> 2.21.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Souza, Jose March 7, 2019, 8:11 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, 2019-03-05 at 15:21 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 02:11:53PM -0800, José Roberto de Souza
> wrote:
> > Now with the watermarks fixes merged, Icelake is stable enough to
> > have the alpha support protection flag removed.
> > 
> > We have a few ICL machines in our CI and it is mostly green with
> > failures in tests that will not impact future linux installations.
> > Also there is no warnings, errors, flickering or any visual defects
> > while doing ordinary tasks like browsing and editing documents in a
> > dual monitor setup.
> > 
> > As a reminder i915.alpha_support was created to protect
> > future linux installation's iso images that might contain a
> > kernel from the enabling time of the new platform. Without this
> > protection most of linux installation was recommending
> > nomodeset option during installation that was getting stick
> > there after installation.
> > 
> > Specifically, alpha support says nothing about the development
> > state of the hardware, and everything about the state of the
> > driver in a kernel release.
> > 
> > This is semantically no different from the old
> > preliminary_hw_support flag, but the old one was all too often
> > interpreted as (preliminary hw) support instead of the intended
> > (preliminary) hw support, and it was misleading for everyone.
> > Hence the rename.
> > 
> > Reference: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/fi-icl-y.html
> 
> This view is great. It is unfortunate we cannot save this and
> this link will be invalid in few runs.
> 
> > Reference: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/shard-iclb.html
> 
> This picture doesn't help, but taking your word, and the BAT results
> and quoting Jani Saarinen: "Nice improvement here what comes to
> passes..."
> 
> Old: f2-icl-
> u         total:262  pass:107  dwarn:98  dfail:0   fail:1   skip:55  
> time:429s
> f2-icl-
> u         total:263  pass:222  dwarn:9   dfail:0   fail:3   skip:29  
> time:339s
> 
> Old: f2-icl-
> y         total:262  pass:105  dwarn:98  dfail:0   fail:4   skip:54  
> time:430s
> f2-icl-
> y         total:476  pass:225  dwarn:7   dfail:0   fail:4   skip:240
> time:470s
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

Pushed to dinq thanks

> 
> > Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
> > Cc: Jani Saarinen <jani.saarinen@intel.com>
> > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > index c42c5ccf38fe..527bd1ceb9ac 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > @@ -658,7 +658,6 @@ static const struct intel_device_info
> > intel_cannonlake_info = {
> >  static const struct intel_device_info intel_icelake_11_info = {
> >  	GEN11_FEATURES,
> >  	PLATFORM(INTEL_ICELAKE),
> > -	.is_alpha_support = 1,
> >  	.engine_mask =
> >  		BIT(RCS0) | BIT(BCS0) | BIT(VECS0) | BIT(VCS0) |
> > BIT(VCS2),
> >  };
> > -- 
> > 2.21.0
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Saarinen, Jani March 8, 2019, 6:37 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Rodrigo Vivi
> Sent: keskiviikko 6. maaliskuuta 2019 1.22
> To: Souza, Jose <jose.souza@intel.com>
> Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Zanoni,
> Paulo R <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/icl: Remove alpha support protection
> 
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 02:11:53PM -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > Now with the watermarks fixes merged, Icelake is stable enough to have
> > the alpha support protection flag removed.
> >
> > We have a few ICL machines in our CI and it is mostly green with
> > failures in tests that will not impact future linux installations.
> > Also there is no warnings, errors, flickering or any visual defects
> > while doing ordinary tasks like browsing and editing documents in a
> > dual monitor setup.
> >
> > As a reminder i915.alpha_support was created to protect future linux
> > installation's iso images that might contain a kernel from the
> > enabling time of the new platform. Without this protection most of
> > linux installation was recommending nomodeset option during
> > installation that was getting stick there after installation.
> >
> > Specifically, alpha support says nothing about the development state
> > of the hardware, and everything about the state of the driver in a
> > kernel release.
> >
> > This is semantically no different from the old preliminary_hw_support
> > flag, but the old one was all too often interpreted as (preliminary
> > hw) support instead of the intended
> > (preliminary) hw support, and it was misleading for everyone.
> > Hence the rename.
> >
> > Reference: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/fi-icl-y.html
> 
> This view is great. It is unfortunate we cannot save this and this link will be invalid in
> few runs.
> 
> > Reference: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/shard-iclb.html
> 
> This picture doesn't help, but taking your word, and the BAT results and quoting Jani
> Saarinen: "Nice improvement here what comes to passes..."
> 
> Old: f2-icl-u         total:262  pass:107  dwarn:98  dfail:0   fail:1   skip:55  time:429s
> f2-icl-u         total:263  pass:222  dwarn:9   dfail:0   fail:3   skip:29  time:339s
> 
> Old: f2-icl-y         total:262  pass:105  dwarn:98  dfail:0   fail:4   skip:54  time:430s
> f2-icl-y         total:476  pass:225  dwarn:7   dfail:0   fail:4   skip:240 time:470s
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

Acked-by: Jani Saarinen <jani.saarinen@intel.com>

> 
> > Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
> > Cc: Jani Saarinen <jani.saarinen@intel.com>
> > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c index c42c5ccf38fe..527bd1ceb9ac
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > @@ -658,7 +658,6 @@ static const struct intel_device_info
> > intel_cannonlake_info = {  static const struct intel_device_info
> intel_icelake_11_info = {
> >  	GEN11_FEATURES,
> >  	PLATFORM(INTEL_ICELAKE),
> > -	.is_alpha_support = 1,
> >  	.engine_mask =
> >  		BIT(RCS0) | BIT(BCS0) | BIT(VECS0) | BIT(VCS0) | BIT(VCS2),  };
> > --
> > 2.21.0
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
index c42c5ccf38fe..527bd1ceb9ac 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
@@ -658,7 +658,6 @@  static const struct intel_device_info intel_cannonlake_info = {
 static const struct intel_device_info intel_icelake_11_info = {
 	GEN11_FEATURES,
 	PLATFORM(INTEL_ICELAKE),
-	.is_alpha_support = 1,
 	.engine_mask =
 		BIT(RCS0) | BIT(BCS0) | BIT(VECS0) | BIT(VCS0) | BIT(VCS2),
 };