Message ID | 20190306030519.10746-1-jin.xiao@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | spi-pxa2xx.c: modify the chip selection timing when spi transfer | expand |
Hi On 3/6/19 5:05 AM, xiao jin wrote: > From: "he, bo" <bo.he@intel.com> > > We find spi can't work on board. More debug shows it's related > to the following patch that changed the chip selection assert and > deassert timing. > ^^ timing caught my attention. More below. > @@ -610,6 +596,7 @@ static void int_transfer_complete(struct driver_data *drv_data) > if (!pxa25x_ssp_comp(drv_data)) > pxa2xx_spi_write(drv_data, SSTO, 0); > > + cs_deassert(drv_data); > spi_finalize_current_transfer(drv_data->master); This > @@ -1070,6 +1057,7 @@ static int pxa2xx_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_controller *master, > pxa2xx_spi_write(drv_data, SSTO, chip->timeout); > } > > + cs_assert(drv_data); and this is not correct with core message loop. It will cause the chip select is toggled with each transfer in PIO mode. If there is no cs_change flag set then there shouldn't be CS toggling between the transfers if SPI message consists of multiple transfers. More over this patch also will regress with DMA mode since there won't be CS deassert at all. Timing reminded me I've seen two cases where there was a timing related glitch in CS output: d0283eb2dbc1 ("spi: pxa2xx: Add output control for multiple Intel LPSS chip selects") 7a8d44bc89e5 ("spi: pxa2xx: Fix too early chipselect deassert") Do you have a possibility to measure with an oscilloscope what goes wrong with the CS after d5898e19c0d7 ("spi: pxa2xx: Use core message processing loop")? Can you share your setup if I can reproduce it here? E.g. SPI clock frequency, single or multiple CS, frequency of occurrence, etc
Hi Jarkko, On 3/6/2019 3:52 PM, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > Hi > > On 3/6/19 5:05 AM, xiao jin wrote: >> From: "he, bo" <bo.he@intel.com> >> >> We find spi can't work on board. More debug shows it's related >> to the following patch that changed the chip selection assert and >> deassert timing. >> > ^^ timing caught my attention. More below. > >> @@ -610,6 +596,7 @@ static void int_transfer_complete(struct >> driver_data *drv_data) >> if (!pxa25x_ssp_comp(drv_data)) >> pxa2xx_spi_write(drv_data, SSTO, 0); >> + cs_deassert(drv_data); >> spi_finalize_current_transfer(drv_data->master); > > This > >> @@ -1070,6 +1057,7 @@ static int pxa2xx_spi_transfer_one(struct >> spi_controller *master, >> pxa2xx_spi_write(drv_data, SSTO, chip->timeout); >> } >> + cs_assert(drv_data); > > and this is not correct with core message loop. It will cause the chip > select is toggled with each transfer in PIO mode. If there is no > cs_change flag set then there shouldn't be CS toggling between the > transfers if SPI message consists of multiple transfers. > > More over this patch also will regress with DMA mode since there won't > be CS deassert at all. > > Timing reminded me I've seen two cases where there was a timing > related glitch in CS output: > > d0283eb2dbc1 ("spi: pxa2xx: Add output control for multiple Intel LPSS > chip selects") > 7a8d44bc89e5 ("spi: pxa2xx: Fix too early chipselect deassert") > > Do you have a possibility to measure with an oscilloscope what goes > wrong with the CS after d5898e19c0d7 ("spi: pxa2xx: Use core message > processing loop")? > > Can you share your setup if I can reproduce it here? E.g. SPI clock > frequency, single or multiple CS, frequency of occurrence, etc > In our setup the pxa_ssp_type is LPSS_BXT_SSP. With more debug we find that the problem is caused in the case of "restart the SSP" when pxa2xx_spi_transfer_one. We will send another RFC patch. Thanks.
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c index ec4b65100..0affa09da 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c @@ -340,11 +340,9 @@ static void lpss_ssp_setup(struct driver_data *drv_data) } } -static void lpss_ssp_select_cs(struct spi_device *spi, +static void lpss_ssp_select_cs(struct driver_data *drv_data, const struct lpss_config *config) { - struct driver_data *drv_data = - spi_controller_get_devdata(spi->controller); u32 value, cs; if (!config->cs_sel_mask) @@ -352,7 +350,7 @@ static void lpss_ssp_select_cs(struct spi_device *spi, value = __lpss_ssp_read_priv(drv_data, config->reg_cs_ctrl); - cs = spi->chip_select; + cs = drv_data->master->cur_msg->spi->chip_select; cs <<= config->cs_sel_shift; if (cs != (value & config->cs_sel_mask)) { /* @@ -371,17 +369,15 @@ static void lpss_ssp_select_cs(struct spi_device *spi, } } -static void lpss_ssp_cs_control(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable) +static void lpss_ssp_cs_control(struct driver_data *drv_data, bool enable) { - struct driver_data *drv_data = - spi_controller_get_devdata(spi->controller); const struct lpss_config *config; u32 value; config = lpss_get_config(drv_data); if (enable) - lpss_ssp_select_cs(spi, config); + lpss_ssp_select_cs(drv_data, config); value = __lpss_ssp_read_priv(drv_data, config->reg_cs_ctrl); if (enable) @@ -391,11 +387,10 @@ static void lpss_ssp_cs_control(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable) __lpss_ssp_write_priv(drv_data, config->reg_cs_ctrl, value); } -static void cs_assert(struct spi_device *spi) +static void cs_assert(struct driver_data *drv_data) { - struct chip_data *chip = spi_get_ctldata(spi); - struct driver_data *drv_data = - spi_controller_get_devdata(spi->controller); + struct chip_data *chip = + spi_get_ctldata(drv_data->master->cur_msg->spi); if (drv_data->ssp_type == CE4100_SSP) { pxa2xx_spi_write(drv_data, SSSR, chip->frm); @@ -413,14 +408,13 @@ static void cs_assert(struct spi_device *spi) } if (is_lpss_ssp(drv_data)) - lpss_ssp_cs_control(spi, true); + lpss_ssp_cs_control(drv_data, true); } -static void cs_deassert(struct spi_device *spi) +static void cs_deassert(struct driver_data *drv_data) { - struct chip_data *chip = spi_get_ctldata(spi); - struct driver_data *drv_data = - spi_controller_get_devdata(spi->controller); + struct chip_data *chip = + spi_get_ctldata(drv_data->master->cur_msg->spi); unsigned long timeout; if (drv_data->ssp_type == CE4100_SSP) @@ -443,15 +437,7 @@ static void cs_deassert(struct spi_device *spi) } if (is_lpss_ssp(drv_data)) - lpss_ssp_cs_control(spi, false); -} - -static void pxa2xx_spi_set_cs(struct spi_device *spi, bool level) -{ - if (level) - cs_deassert(spi); - else - cs_assert(spi); + lpss_ssp_cs_control(drv_data, false); } int pxa2xx_spi_flush(struct driver_data *drv_data) @@ -610,6 +596,7 @@ static void int_transfer_complete(struct driver_data *drv_data) if (!pxa25x_ssp_comp(drv_data)) pxa2xx_spi_write(drv_data, SSTO, 0); + cs_deassert(drv_data); spi_finalize_current_transfer(drv_data->master); } @@ -1070,6 +1057,7 @@ static int pxa2xx_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_controller *master, pxa2xx_spi_write(drv_data, SSTO, chip->timeout); } + cs_assert(drv_data); /* * Release the data by enabling service requests and interrupts, * without changing any mode bits @@ -1563,7 +1551,6 @@ static int pxa2xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) master->dma_alignment = DMA_ALIGNMENT; master->cleanup = cleanup; master->setup = setup; - master->set_cs = pxa2xx_spi_set_cs; master->transfer_one = pxa2xx_spi_transfer_one; master->handle_err = pxa2xx_spi_handle_err; master->unprepare_transfer_hardware = pxa2xx_spi_unprepare_transfer;