@@ -6279,19 +6279,19 @@ static u32 ufshcd_find_max_sup_active_icc_level(struct ufs_hba *hba,
goto out;
}
- if (hba->vreg_info.vcc)
+ if (hba->vreg_info.vcc && hba->vreg_info.vcc->max_uA)
icc_level = ufshcd_get_max_icc_level(
hba->vreg_info.vcc->max_uA,
POWER_DESC_MAX_ACTV_ICC_LVLS - 1,
&desc_buf[PWR_DESC_ACTIVE_LVLS_VCC_0]);
- if (hba->vreg_info.vccq)
+ if (hba->vreg_info.vccq && hba->vreg_info.vccq->max_uA)
icc_level = ufshcd_get_max_icc_level(
hba->vreg_info.vccq->max_uA,
icc_level,
&desc_buf[PWR_DESC_ACTIVE_LVLS_VCCQ_0]);
- if (hba->vreg_info.vccq2)
+ if (hba->vreg_info.vccq2 && hba->vreg_info.vccq2->max_uA)
icc_level = ufshcd_get_max_icc_level(
hba->vreg_info.vccq2->max_uA,
icc_level,
@@ -6989,6 +6989,15 @@ static int ufshcd_config_vreg_load(struct device *dev, struct ufs_vreg *vreg,
if (!vreg)
return 0;
+ /*
+ * "set_load" operation shall be required on those regulators
+ * which specifically configured current limitation. Otherwise
+ * zero max_uA may cause unexpected behavior when regulator is
+ * enabled or set as high power mode.
+ */
+ if (!vreg->max_uA)
+ return 0;
+
ret = regulator_set_load(vreg->reg, ua);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(dev, "%s: %s set load (ua=%d) failed, err=%d\n",
Currently if a regulator has "<name>-fixed-regulator" property in device tree, it will skip current limit configuration. This lead to a zero "max_uA" value in struct ufs_vreg. However, "regulator_set_load" operation shall be required on those regulators which specifically configured current limit, otherwise a zero max_uA value may cause unexpected behavior when this regulator is enabled or set as high power mode. Similarly, in icc_level configuration flow, icc_level shall be updated if specified regulator has also configured current limit, otherwise a zero max_uA will lead to wrong icc_level which may cause unexpected results after written to device. Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com> --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)