From patchwork Mon Mar 18 16:35:32 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Vincenzo Frascino X-Patchwork-Id: 10858043 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1140139A for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C120928F9A for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id B39D32936F; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:36:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5883C28F9A for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:36:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Hh+uv67BIV2Z0dSX/Q63J63RP3aoNgm1r/b1+JCTygw=; b=XuKQ8m/gJv1NRY 9f0Ql80HJbJf066PV2NlRH59AJHQMXAtgD2ECwcrtzPeWsw/+6uKz0ZZeRDxEvTLPnyw+sNISKc2k OCZnhysSOEFfBmh6MbSHqF3KMFZNDrP807a3lX5PwLWTS5s2JTGzXyEMs74bFPeO/jagaEf+Wm5Es PMHNficLhhU5uJrovkV1us1khZZD7Azq8Wma91+mIBkbkPlDvHSnp4Hvork++RV7tyUDzIaQ1U+zs 1sEdNni6ihv74c6rrZKOe+0yyIpfy4dkuUAZRcuUkvP+Sjjv7ra6daExK4H/YvvUQc/BwtWyeKXJK xb1RI5/J7hfkd4a86MZQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h5vFg-0001Kj-N0; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:36:40 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70] helo=foss.arm.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h5vFF-0000m9-2D for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:36:18 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC7B174E; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 09:36:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e119884-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e119884-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.72]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9F083F614; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 09:36:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Vincenzo Frascino To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: Relax Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:35:32 +0000 Message-Id: <20190318163533.26838-4-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190318163533.26838-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> References: <20190318163533.26838-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190318_093613_464926_731CE3BF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.91 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kate Stewart , Mark Rutland , Peter Zijlstra , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Alexei Starovoitov , Kostya Serebryany , Eric Dumazet , Chintan Pandya , Shuah Khan , Ingo Molnar , Jacob Bramley , Daniel Borkmann , Szabolcs Nagy , Steven Rostedt , Dave Martin , Evgeniy Stepanov , Kees Cook , Ruben Ayrapetyan , Andrey Konovalov , Kevin Brodsky , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Graeme Barnes , Alexander Viro , Dmitry Vyukov , Branislav Rankov , Ramana Radhakrishnan , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Luc Van Oostenryck , Lee Smith , Andrew Morton , Robin Murphy , "David S. Miller" , "Kirill A . Shutemov" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP On arm64 the TCR_EL1.TBI0 bit has been always enabled hence the userspace (EL0) is allowed to set a non-zero value in the top byte but the resulting pointers are not allowed at the user-kernel syscall ABI boundary. With the relaxed ABI proposed in this set, it is now possible to pass tagged pointers to the syscalls, when these pointers are in memory ranges obtained by an anonymous (MAP_ANONYMOUS) mmap() or sbrk(). Relax the requirements described in tagged-pointers.txt to be compliant with the behaviours guaranteed by the ABI deriving from the introduction of the ARM64_AT_FLAGS_SYSCALL_TBI flag. Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Will Deacon CC: Andrey Konovalov Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino --- Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt | 23 ++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt b/Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt index a25a99e82bb1..df27188b9433 100644 --- a/Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt +++ b/Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt @@ -18,7 +18,8 @@ Passing tagged addresses to the kernel -------------------------------------- All interpretation of userspace memory addresses by the kernel assumes -an address tag of 0x00. +an address tag of 0x00, unless the ARM64_AT_FLAGS_SYSCALL_TBI flag is +set by the kernel. This includes, but is not limited to, addresses found in: @@ -31,18 +32,23 @@ This includes, but is not limited to, addresses found in: - the frame pointer (x29) and frame records, e.g. when interpreting them to generate a backtrace or call graph. -Using non-zero address tags in any of these locations may result in an -error code being returned, a (fatal) signal being raised, or other modes -of failure. +Using non-zero address tags in any of these locations when the +ARM64_AT_FLAGS_SYSCALL_TBI flag is not set by the kernel, may result in +an error code being returned, a (fatal) signal being raised, or other +modes of failure. -For these reasons, passing non-zero address tags to the kernel via -system calls is forbidden, and using a non-zero address tag for sp is -strongly discouraged. +For these reasons, when the flag is not set, passing non-zero address +tags to the kernel via system calls is forbidden, and using a non-zero +address tag for sp is strongly discouraged. Programs maintaining a frame pointer and frame records that use non-zero address tags may suffer impaired or inaccurate debug and profiling visibility. +A definition of the meaning of ARM64_AT_FLAGS_SYSCALL_TBI and of the +guarantees that the ABI provides when the flag is set by the kernel can +be found in: Documentation/arm64/elf_at_flags.txt. + Preserving tags --------------- @@ -57,6 +63,9 @@ be preserved. The architecture prevents the use of a tagged PC, so the upper byte will be set to a sign-extension of bit 55 on exception return. +This behaviours are preserved even when the ARM64_AT_FLAGS_SYSCALL_TBI flag +is set by the kernel. + Other considerations --------------------