From patchwork Tue Mar 19 08:30:34 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Amit Daniel Kachhap X-Patchwork-Id: 10859087 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 160A417E0 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 08:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C5A28FD0 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 08:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id DA638295C8; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 08:31:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6551728FD0 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 08:31:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=nefeV7ZFhjBhtuShdrxHaxKs+I3ywia6UJ/PjZdZnKM=; b=Q793oXl2eZ5zmvlQBcCUCrWqa0 RMMB59afWUsOtELgLJ/cQhgcYvhATWid4GR35vgPhwYl8qXcC90gw+6dASQN2TdUWyWupyKfdAYGn cdZR4PS3Y8nm9KJPtSkq1YsYeNt95wnZ7eHUE/Ud5mTEH5KV6S0L6bERa2jG9lH3kKWDmShXuVP3I N1aS0l866yJUBjL8L7i33AaP0m6gB7pYugIsjarM0h9KegGboAcyFt5wBeoku7WoZs6E/02W3ibQ9 CiDco8pYke/z1cHTMvrOS6Si62Cm1kjuFINO5U/wULWBqVSIy+E72sSgfhcomUBzSWu3tNzBC7lR2 pOEVNCIQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h6A9f-00066O-N3; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 08:31:27 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70] helo=foss.arm.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h6A9U-0005sM-DI for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 08:31:21 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFEEA1596; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 01:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from a075553-lin.blr.arm.com (a075553-lin.blr.arm.com [10.162.0.144]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A7D953F59C; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 01:31:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Amit Daniel Kachhap To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v7 1/10] KVM: arm64: Propagate vcpu into read_id_reg() Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:00:34 +0530 Message-Id: <1552984243-7689-2-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1552984243-7689-1-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@arm.com> References: <1552984243-7689-1-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190319_013117_096954_397D4D44 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.34 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Andrew Jones , Julien Thierry , Marc Zyngier , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Christoffer Dall , Kristina Martsenko , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, James Morse , Ramana Radhakrishnan , Amit Daniel Kachhap , Dave Martin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Dave Martin Architecture features that are conditionally visible to the guest will require run-time checks in the ID register accessor functions. In particular, read_id_reg() will need to perform checks in order to generate the correct emulated value for certain ID register fields such as ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE for example. This patch propagates vcpu into read_id_reg() so that future patches can add run-time checks on the guest configuration here. For now, there is no functional change. Signed-off-by: Dave Martin Reviewed-by: Alex Bennee --- arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 23 +++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c index 539feec..a5d14b5 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c @@ -1044,7 +1044,8 @@ static bool access_arch_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, } /* Read a sanitised cpufeature ID register by sys_reg_desc */ -static u64 read_id_reg(struct sys_reg_desc const *r, bool raz) +static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + struct sys_reg_desc const *r, bool raz) { u32 id = sys_reg((u32)r->Op0, (u32)r->Op1, (u32)r->CRn, (u32)r->CRm, (u32)r->Op2); @@ -1078,7 +1079,7 @@ static bool __access_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, if (p->is_write) return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, r); - p->regval = read_id_reg(r, raz); + p->regval = read_id_reg(vcpu, r, raz); return true; } @@ -1107,16 +1108,18 @@ static u64 sys_reg_to_index(const struct sys_reg_desc *reg); * are stored, and for set_id_reg() we don't allow the effective value * to be changed. */ -static int __get_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr, +static int __get_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr, bool raz) { const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd); - const u64 val = read_id_reg(rd, raz); + const u64 val = read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz); return reg_to_user(uaddr, &val, id); } -static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr, +static int __set_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr, bool raz) { const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd); @@ -1128,7 +1131,7 @@ static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr, return err; /* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */ - if (val != read_id_reg(rd, raz)) + if (val != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz)) return -EINVAL; return 0; @@ -1137,25 +1140,25 @@ static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr, static int get_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr) { - return __get_id_reg(rd, uaddr, false); + return __get_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, false); } static int set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr) { - return __set_id_reg(rd, uaddr, false); + return __set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, false); } static int get_raz_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr) { - return __get_id_reg(rd, uaddr, true); + return __get_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, true); } static int set_raz_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr) { - return __set_id_reg(rd, uaddr, true); + return __set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, true); } static bool access_ctr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,