@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@ static int is_foreground_fd(int fd)
return tpgrp < 0 || tpgrp == getpgid(0);
}
-static int display(struct progress *progress, uint64_t n, const char *done)
+static void display(struct progress *progress, uint64_t n, const char *done)
{
const char *eol, *tp;
if (progress->delay && (!progress_update || --progress->delay))
- return 0;
+ return;
progress->last_value = n;
tp = (progress->throughput) ? progress->throughput->display.buf : "";
@@ -100,7 +100,6 @@ static int display(struct progress *progress, uint64_t n, const char *done)
fflush(stderr);
}
progress_update = 0;
- return 1;
}
} else if (progress_update) {
if (is_foreground_fd(fileno(stderr)) || done) {
@@ -109,10 +108,7 @@ static int display(struct progress *progress, uint64_t n, const char *done)
fflush(stderr);
}
progress_update = 0;
- return 1;
}
-
- return 0;
}
static void throughput_string(struct strbuf *buf, uint64_t total,
@@ -188,9 +184,10 @@ void display_throughput(struct progress *progress, uint64_t total)
display(progress, progress->last_value, NULL);
}
-int display_progress(struct progress *progress, uint64_t n)
+void display_progress(struct progress *progress, uint64_t n)
{
- return progress ? display(progress, n, NULL) : 0;
+ if (progress)
+ display(progress, n, NULL);
}
static struct progress *start_progress_delay(const char *title, uint64_t total,
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
struct progress;
void display_throughput(struct progress *progress, uint64_t total);
-int display_progress(struct progress *progress, uint64_t n);
+void display_progress(struct progress *progress, uint64_t n);
struct progress *start_progress(const char *title, uint64_t total);
struct progress *start_delayed_progress(const char *title, uint64_t total);
void stop_progress(struct progress **progress);
Ever since the progress infrastructure was introduced in 96a02f8f6d (common progress display support, 2007-04-18), display_progress() has returned an int, telling callers whether it updated the progress bar or not. However, this is: - useless, because over the last dozen years there has never been a single caller that cared about that return value. - not quite true, because it doesn't print a progress bar when running in the background, yet it returns 1; see 85cb8906f0 (progress: no progress in background, 2015-04-13). The related display_throughput() function returned void already upon its introduction in cf84d51c43 (add throughput to progress display, 2007-10-30). Let's make display_progress() return void, too. While doing so several return statements in display() become unnecessary, remove them. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> --- progress.c | 13 +++++-------- progress.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)