[GIT,PULL] ARM: at91: SoC for 5.2
mbox series

Message ID 20190423062243.27437-1-ludovic.desroches@microchip.com
State New
Headers show
Series
  • [GIT,PULL] ARM: at91: SoC for 5.2
Related show

Pull-request

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/at91/linux.git at91-soc

Message

Ludovic Desroches April 23, 2019, 6:22 a.m. UTC
Hi Arnd, Kevin, Olof,

Changes are about PM for the SAM9X60 SoC.

There should be a conflict between "ARM: at91: pm: introduce at91_soc_pm structure"
and a fixes for 5.1 "ARM: at91: pm: introduce at91_soc_pm structure" which has
been solved in linux-next.

Regards

Ludovic


The following changes since commit 9e98c678c2d6ae3a17cb2de55d17f69dddaa231b:

  Linux 5.1-rc1 (2019-03-17 14:22:26 -0700)

are available in the Git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/at91/linux.git at91-soc

for you to fetch changes up to 2725d70aa5138284ba2cebf0ef51dd23e0c9ea21:

  ARM: at91: pm: do not disable/enable PLLA for ULP modes (2019-03-28 11:05:53 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Claudiu Beznea (8):
      ARM: at91: pm: introduce at91_soc_pm structure
      dt-bindings: arm: atmel: add binding for SAM9X60 SoC
      ARM: at91: pm: initial PM support for SAM9X60
      ARM: at91: pm: keep at91_pm_backup_init() only for SAMA5D2 SoCs
      ARM: at91: pm: add support for per SoC wakeup source configuration
      ARM: at91: pm: add ULP1 support for SAM9X60
      ARM: at91: pm: disable RC oscillator in ULP0
      ARM: at91: pm: do not disable/enable PLLA for ULP modes

 .../devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.txt         |   1 +
 arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9.c                      |  18 ++
 arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h                       |   2 +
 arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c                            | 193 ++++++++++++++-------
 arch/arm/mach-at91/pm_suspend.S                    | 111 ++++++++----
 include/linux/clk/at91_pmc.h                       |   1 +
 6 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)

Comments

Olof Johansson April 29, 2019, 4:43 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 08:22:43AM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> Hi Arnd, Kevin, Olof,
> 
> Changes are about PM for the SAM9X60 SoC.
> 
> There should be a conflict between "ARM: at91: pm: introduce at91_soc_pm structure"
> and a fixes for 5.1 "ARM: at91: pm: introduce at91_soc_pm structure" which has
> been solved in linux-next.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Ludovic

I just noticed you're not using signed tags -- I missed that on the DT branch.

Please get setup with a key and use tags, and use those to describe your
pull requests. Given that you've got kernel.org access you must already
have a key signed by people so that step is already taken care of.



-Olof