diff mbox series

[2/3] btrfs: switch extent_buffer spinning_writers from atomic to int

Message ID 6dfcb89b254ee5016edfa9816fce3487a23b446c.1559233731.git.dsterba@suse.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Extent buffer lock cleanups | expand

Commit Message

David Sterba May 30, 2019, 4:31 p.m. UTC 
The spinning_writers is either 0 or 1 and always updated under the lock,
so we don't need the atomic_t semantics.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c  |  2 +-
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.h  |  2 +-
 fs/btrfs/locking.c    | 10 +++++-----
 fs/btrfs/print-tree.c |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Comments

Nikolay Borisov May 31, 2019, 9:19 a.m. UTC | #1 
On 30.05.19 г. 19:31 ч., David Sterba wrote:
> The spinning_writers is either 0 or 1 and always updated under the lock,
> so we don't need the atomic_t semantics.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/extent_io.c  |  2 +-
>  fs/btrfs/extent_io.h  |  2 +-
>  fs/btrfs/locking.c    | 10 +++++-----
>  fs/btrfs/print-tree.c |  2 +-
>  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> index 57b6de9df7c4..71ee9e976307 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> @@ -4842,7 +4842,7 @@ __alloc_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 start,
>  	BUG_ON(len > MAX_INLINE_EXTENT_BUFFER_SIZE);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
> -	atomic_set(&eb->spinning_writers, 0);
> +	eb->spinning_writers = 0;
>  	atomic_set(&eb->spinning_readers, 0);
>  	atomic_set(&eb->read_locks, 0);
>  	atomic_set(&eb->write_locks, 0);
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
> index 201da61dfc21..5616b96c365d 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ struct extent_buffer {
>  	wait_queue_head_t read_lock_wq;
>  	struct page *pages[INLINE_EXTENT_BUFFER_PAGES];
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
> -	atomic_t spinning_writers;
> +	int spinning_writers;
>  	atomic_t spinning_readers;
>  	atomic_t read_locks;
>  	atomic_t write_locks;
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.c b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
> index 5feb01147e19..270667627977 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/locking.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
> @@ -15,19 +15,19 @@
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
>  static void btrfs_assert_spinning_writers_get(struct extent_buffer *eb)
>  {
> -	WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers));
> -	atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_writers);
> +	WARN_ON(eb->spinning_writers);
> +	eb->spinning_writers++;
>  }
>  
>  static void btrfs_assert_spinning_writers_put(struct extent_buffer *eb)
>  {
> -	WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers) != 1);
> -	atomic_dec(&eb->spinning_writers);
> +	WARN_ON(eb->spinning_writers != 1);
> +	eb->spinning_writers--;
>  }
>  
>  static void btrfs_assert_no_spinning_writers(struct extent_buffer *eb)
>  {
> -	WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers));
> +	WARN_ON(eb->spinning_writers);
>  }

IMO longterm  it will be good if those debug functions contained
lockdep_assert_held_exclusive/read macros for posterity.

>  
>  static void btrfs_assert_spinning_readers_get(struct extent_buffer *eb)
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/print-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/print-tree.c
> index 7cb4f1fbe043..c5cc435ed39a 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/print-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/print-tree.c
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static void print_eb_refs_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
>  		   atomic_read(&eb->read_locks),
>  		   eb->blocking_writers,
>  		   atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers),
> -		   atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers),
> +		   eb->spinning_writers,
>  		   atomic_read(&eb->spinning_readers),
>  		   eb->lock_owner, current->pid);
>  #endif
>
David Sterba May 31, 2019, 11:28 a.m. UTC | #2 
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 12:19:15PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> >  {
> > -	WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers));
> > -	atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_writers);
> > +	WARN_ON(eb->spinning_writers);
> > +	eb->spinning_writers++;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void btrfs_assert_spinning_writers_put(struct extent_buffer *eb)
> >  {
> > -	WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers) != 1);
> > -	atomic_dec(&eb->spinning_writers);
> > +	WARN_ON(eb->spinning_writers != 1);
> > +	eb->spinning_writers--;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void btrfs_assert_no_spinning_writers(struct extent_buffer *eb)
> >  {
> > -	WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers));
> > +	WARN_ON(eb->spinning_writers);
> >  }
> 
> IMO longterm  it will be good if those debug functions contained
> lockdep_assert_held_exclusive/read macros for posterity.

The functions are not public and used only inside implementation of
locks, so the chances of wrong use are low so I don't see much value
adding it.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 57b6de9df7c4..71ee9e976307 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -4842,7 +4842,7 @@  __alloc_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 start,
 	BUG_ON(len > MAX_INLINE_EXTENT_BUFFER_SIZE);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
-	atomic_set(&eb->spinning_writers, 0);
+	eb->spinning_writers = 0;
 	atomic_set(&eb->spinning_readers, 0);
 	atomic_set(&eb->read_locks, 0);
 	atomic_set(&eb->write_locks, 0);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
index 201da61dfc21..5616b96c365d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@  struct extent_buffer {
 	wait_queue_head_t read_lock_wq;
 	struct page *pages[INLINE_EXTENT_BUFFER_PAGES];
 #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
-	atomic_t spinning_writers;
+	int spinning_writers;
 	atomic_t spinning_readers;
 	atomic_t read_locks;
 	atomic_t write_locks;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.c b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
index 5feb01147e19..270667627977 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/locking.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
@@ -15,19 +15,19 @@ 
 #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
 static void btrfs_assert_spinning_writers_get(struct extent_buffer *eb)
 {
-	WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers));
-	atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_writers);
+	WARN_ON(eb->spinning_writers);
+	eb->spinning_writers++;
 }
 
 static void btrfs_assert_spinning_writers_put(struct extent_buffer *eb)
 {
-	WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers) != 1);
-	atomic_dec(&eb->spinning_writers);
+	WARN_ON(eb->spinning_writers != 1);
+	eb->spinning_writers--;
 }
 
 static void btrfs_assert_no_spinning_writers(struct extent_buffer *eb)
 {
-	WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers));
+	WARN_ON(eb->spinning_writers);
 }
 
 static void btrfs_assert_spinning_readers_get(struct extent_buffer *eb)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/print-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/print-tree.c
index 7cb4f1fbe043..c5cc435ed39a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/print-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/print-tree.c
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@  static void print_eb_refs_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
 		   atomic_read(&eb->read_locks),
 		   eb->blocking_writers,
 		   atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers),
-		   atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers),
+		   eb->spinning_writers,
 		   atomic_read(&eb->spinning_readers),
 		   eb->lock_owner, current->pid);
 #endif