diff mbox series

[v2] drm/panfrost: make devfreq optional again

Message ID 20190605150233.32722-1-narmstrong@baylibre.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v2] drm/panfrost: make devfreq optional again | expand

Commit Message

Neil Armstrong June 5, 2019, 3:02 p.m. UTC
Devfreq runtime usage was made mandatory, thus making panfrost fail to probe
on Amlogic S912 SoCs missing the "operating-points-v2" property.
Make it optional again, leaving PM_DEVFREQ selected by default.

Fixes: f3617b449d ("drm/panfrost: Select devfreq")
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
---
Changes since v1:
- fixed else/if logic in panfrost_devfreq_init

 drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Ezequiel Garcia June 5, 2019, 6:50 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 2019-06-05 at 17:02 +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Devfreq runtime usage was made mandatory, thus making panfrost fail to probe
> on Amlogic S912 SoCs missing the "operating-points-v2" property.
> Make it optional again, leaving PM_DEVFREQ selected by default.
> 
> Fixes: f3617b449d ("drm/panfrost: Select devfreq")
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>

Reviewed-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>

Thanks for the fix,
Eze

> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - fixed else/if logic in panfrost_devfreq_init
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c
> index 29fcffdf2d57..db798532b0b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c
> @@ -140,7 +140,9 @@ int panfrost_devfreq_init(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	ret = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(&pfdev->pdev->dev);
> -	if (ret)
> +	if (ret == -ENODEV) /* Optional, continue without devfreq */
> +		return 0;
> +	else if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	panfrost_devfreq_reset(pfdev);
> @@ -170,6 +172,9 @@ void panfrost_devfreq_resume(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> +	if (!pfdev->devfreq.devfreq)
> +		return;
> +
>  	panfrost_devfreq_reset(pfdev);
>  	for (i = 0; i < NUM_JOB_SLOTS; i++)
>  		pfdev->devfreq.slot[i].busy = false;
> @@ -179,6 +184,9 @@ void panfrost_devfreq_resume(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
>  
>  void panfrost_devfreq_suspend(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
>  {
> +	if (!pfdev->devfreq.devfreq)
> +		return;
> +
>  	devfreq_suspend_device(pfdev->devfreq.devfreq);
>  }
>  
> @@ -188,6 +196,9 @@ static void panfrost_devfreq_update_utilization(struct panfrost_device *pfdev, i
>  	ktime_t now;
>  	ktime_t last;
>  
> +	if (!pfdev->devfreq.devfreq)
> +		return;
> +
>  	now = ktime_get();
>  	last = pfdev->devfreq.slot[slot].time_last_update;
>
Rob Herring (Arm) June 10, 2019, 3:32 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 9:02 AM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> wrote:
>
> Devfreq runtime usage was made mandatory, thus making panfrost fail to probe
> on Amlogic S912 SoCs missing the "operating-points-v2" property.
> Make it optional again, leaving PM_DEVFREQ selected by default.
>
> Fixes: f3617b449d ("drm/panfrost: Select devfreq")
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - fixed else/if logic in panfrost_devfreq_init
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Applied.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c
index 29fcffdf2d57..db798532b0b6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c
@@ -140,7 +140,9 @@  int panfrost_devfreq_init(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
 		return 0;
 
 	ret = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(&pfdev->pdev->dev);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret == -ENODEV) /* Optional, continue without devfreq */
+		return 0;
+	else if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
 	panfrost_devfreq_reset(pfdev);
@@ -170,6 +172,9 @@  void panfrost_devfreq_resume(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
 {
 	int i;
 
+	if (!pfdev->devfreq.devfreq)
+		return;
+
 	panfrost_devfreq_reset(pfdev);
 	for (i = 0; i < NUM_JOB_SLOTS; i++)
 		pfdev->devfreq.slot[i].busy = false;
@@ -179,6 +184,9 @@  void panfrost_devfreq_resume(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
 
 void panfrost_devfreq_suspend(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
 {
+	if (!pfdev->devfreq.devfreq)
+		return;
+
 	devfreq_suspend_device(pfdev->devfreq.devfreq);
 }
 
@@ -188,6 +196,9 @@  static void panfrost_devfreq_update_utilization(struct panfrost_device *pfdev, i
 	ktime_t now;
 	ktime_t last;
 
+	if (!pfdev->devfreq.devfreq)
+		return;
+
 	now = ktime_get();
 	last = pfdev->devfreq.slot[slot].time_last_update;