Message ID | 20190702140745.27767-3-imammedo@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | fix memory-less numa configuration and switch to memdev syntax in tests | expand |
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 10:07:45AM -0400, Igor Mammedov wrote: > it will test preferred memdev option more extensively and remove > undesired deprecation warnings during 'make check' > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> > --- [...] > diff --git a/tests/numa-test.c b/tests/numa-test.c > index 8de8581231..902e8de4d1 100644 > --- a/tests/numa-test.c > +++ b/tests/numa-test.c > @@ -26,8 +26,10 @@ static void test_mon_explicit(const void *data) > QTestState *qts; > > cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 8 " > - "-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-3 " > - "-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=4-7 "); > + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M " > + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M " > + "-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-3,memdev=ram0 " > + "-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=4-7,memdev=ram1 "); These changes break on ppc64, where default RAM size is 512 MiB and it has to be a multiple of 256 MiB. Can't we just make the warnings be conditional on !qtest_enabled(), like we already do elsewhere? > qts = qtest_init(cli); > > s = qtest_hmp(qts, "info numa"); > @@ -45,7 +47,10 @@ static void test_mon_default(const void *data) > char *cli; > QTestState *qts; > > - cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 8 -numa node -numa node"); > + cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 8 " > + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M " > + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M " > + "-numa node,memdev=ram0 -numa node,memdev=ram1"); > qts = qtest_init(cli); > > s = qtest_hmp(qts, "info numa"); > @@ -64,8 +69,10 @@ static void test_mon_partial(const void *data) > QTestState *qts; > > cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 8 " > - "-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1 " > - "-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=4-5 "); > + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M " > + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M " > + "-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1,memdev=ram0 " > + "-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=4-5,memdev=ram1"); > qts = qtest_init(cli); > > s = qtest_hmp(qts, "info numa"); > @@ -93,7 +100,11 @@ static void test_query_cpus(const void *data) > QObject *e; > QTestState *qts; > > - cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 8 -numa node,cpus=0-3 -numa node,cpus=4-7"); > + cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 8 " > + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M " > + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M " > + "-numa node,cpus=0-3,memdev=ram0 " > + "-numa node,cpus=4-7,memdev=ram1"); > qts = qtest_init(cli); > cpus = get_cpus(qts, &resp); > g_assert(cpus); > @@ -132,7 +143,9 @@ static void pc_numa_cpu(const void *data) > QTestState *qts; > > cli = make_cli(data, "-cpu pentium -smp 8,sockets=2,cores=2,threads=2 " > - "-numa node,nodeid=0 -numa node,nodeid=1 " > + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M " > + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M " > + "-numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=ram0 -numa node,nodeid=1,memdev=ram1 " > "-numa cpu,node-id=1,socket-id=0 " > "-numa cpu,node-id=0,socket-id=1,core-id=0 " > "-numa cpu,node-id=0,socket-id=1,core-id=1,thread-id=0 " > @@ -186,7 +199,9 @@ static void spapr_numa_cpu(const void *data) > QTestState *qts; > > cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 4,cores=4 " > - "-numa node,nodeid=0 -numa node,nodeid=1 " > + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M " > + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M " > + "-numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=ram0 -numa node,nodeid=1,memdev=ram1 " > "-numa cpu,node-id=0,core-id=0 " > "-numa cpu,node-id=0,core-id=1 " > "-numa cpu,node-id=0,core-id=2 " > @@ -232,7 +247,9 @@ static void aarch64_numa_cpu(const void *data) > QTestState *qts; > > cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 2 " > - "-numa node,nodeid=0 -numa node,nodeid=1 " > + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M " > + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M " > + "-numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=ram0 -numa node,nodeid=1,memdev=ram1 " > "-numa cpu,node-id=1,thread-id=0 " > "-numa cpu,node-id=0,thread-id=1"); > qts = qtest_init(cli); > @@ -274,14 +291,16 @@ static void pc_dynamic_cpu_cfg(const void *data) > QList *cpus; > QTestState *qs; > > - qs = qtest_initf("%s -nodefaults --preconfig -smp 2", > + qs = qtest_initf("%s -nodefaults --preconfig -smp 2 " > + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M " > + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M", > data ? (char *)data : ""); > > /* create 2 numa nodes */ > g_assert(!qmp_rsp_is_err(qtest_qmp(qs, "{ 'execute': 'set-numa-node'," > - " 'arguments': { 'type': 'node', 'nodeid': 0 } }"))); > + " 'arguments': { 'type': 'node', 'nodeid': 0, 'memdev': 'ram0' } }"))); > g_assert(!qmp_rsp_is_err(qtest_qmp(qs, "{ 'execute': 'set-numa-node'," > - " 'arguments': { 'type': 'node', 'nodeid': 1 } }"))); > + " 'arguments': { 'type': 'node', 'nodeid': 1, 'memdev': 'ram1' } }"))); > > /* map 2 cpus in non default reverse order > * i.e socket1->node0, socket0->node1 > -- > 2.18.1 >
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 02:19:01PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 10:07:45AM -0400, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > it will test preferred memdev option more extensively and remove > > undesired deprecation warnings during 'make check' > > > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> > > --- > [...] > > diff --git a/tests/numa-test.c b/tests/numa-test.c > > index 8de8581231..902e8de4d1 100644 > > --- a/tests/numa-test.c > > +++ b/tests/numa-test.c > > @@ -26,8 +26,10 @@ static void test_mon_explicit(const void *data) > > QTestState *qts; > > > > cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 8 " > > - "-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-3 " > > - "-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=4-7 "); > > + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M " > > + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M " > > + "-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-3,memdev=ram0 " > > + "-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=4-7,memdev=ram1 "); > > These changes break on ppc64, where default RAM size is 512 MiB > and it has to be a multiple of 256 MiB. > > Can't we just make the warnings be conditional on > !qtest_enabled(), like we already do elsewhere? The answer is: we can, but this is not enough for bios-tables-test.c because it doesn't use accel=qtest. I've removed the numa-test.c changes from this patch, and added the fix I have submitted at: Subject: numa: Make deprecation warnings conditional on !qtest_enabled() Message-Id: <20190702215726.23661-1-ehabkost@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 19:03:10 -0300 Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 02:19:01PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 10:07:45AM -0400, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > it will test preferred memdev option more extensively and remove > > > undesired deprecation warnings during 'make check' > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> > > > --- > > [...] > > > diff --git a/tests/numa-test.c b/tests/numa-test.c > > > index 8de8581231..902e8de4d1 100644 > > > --- a/tests/numa-test.c > > > +++ b/tests/numa-test.c > > > @@ -26,8 +26,10 @@ static void test_mon_explicit(const void *data) > > > QTestState *qts; > > > > > > cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 8 " > > > - "-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-3 " > > > - "-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=4-7 "); > > > + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M " > > > + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M " > > > + "-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-3,memdev=ram0 " > > > + "-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=4-7,memdev=ram1 "); > > > > These changes break on ppc64, where default RAM size is 512 MiB > > and it has to be a multiple of 256 MiB. > > > > Can't we just make the warnings be conditional on > > !qtest_enabled(), like we already do elsewhere? > > The answer is: we can, but this is not enough for > bios-tables-test.c because it doesn't use accel=qtest. I've > removed the numa-test.c changes from this patch, and added the > fix I have submitted at: > > Subject: numa: Make deprecation warnings conditional on !qtest_enabled() > Message-Id: <20190702215726.23661-1-ehabkost@redhat.com> acked as it fixes immediate issue with warnings. I'll work on numa-test.c some more, since simple replacing of mem with memdev is not enough
diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c index 0ce55182f2..d863233fe9 100644 --- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c +++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c @@ -688,6 +688,8 @@ static void test_acpi_q35_tcg_mmio64(void) }; test_acpi_one("-m 128M,slots=1,maxmem=2G " + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=128M " + "-numa node,memdev=ram0 " "-device pci-testdev,membar=2G", &data); free_test_data(&data); @@ -701,7 +703,9 @@ static void test_acpi_piix4_tcg_cphp(void) data.machine = MACHINE_PC; data.variant = ".cphp"; test_acpi_one("-smp 2,cores=3,sockets=2,maxcpus=6" - " -numa node -numa node" + " -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M" + " -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M" + " -numa node,memdev=ram0 -numa node,memdev=ram1" " -numa dist,src=0,dst=1,val=21", &data); free_test_data(&data); @@ -715,7 +719,9 @@ static void test_acpi_q35_tcg_cphp(void) data.machine = MACHINE_Q35; data.variant = ".cphp"; test_acpi_one(" -smp 2,cores=3,sockets=2,maxcpus=6" - " -numa node -numa node" + " -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M" + " -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M" + " -numa node,memdev=ram0 -numa node,memdev=ram1" " -numa dist,src=0,dst=1,val=21", &data); free_test_data(&data); @@ -766,7 +772,9 @@ static void test_acpi_q35_tcg_memhp(void) data.machine = MACHINE_Q35; data.variant = ".memhp"; test_acpi_one(" -m 128,slots=3,maxmem=1G" - " -numa node -numa node" + " -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M" + " -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M" + " -numa node,memdev=ram0 -numa node,memdev=ram1" " -numa dist,src=0,dst=1,val=21", &data); free_test_data(&data); @@ -780,7 +788,9 @@ static void test_acpi_piix4_tcg_memhp(void) data.machine = MACHINE_PC; data.variant = ".memhp"; test_acpi_one(" -m 128,slots=3,maxmem=1G" - " -numa node -numa node" + " -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M" + " -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M" + " -numa node,memdev=ram0 -numa node,memdev=ram1" " -numa dist,src=0,dst=1,val=21", &data); free_test_data(&data); @@ -793,7 +803,8 @@ static void test_acpi_q35_tcg_numamem(void) memset(&data, 0, sizeof(data)); data.machine = MACHINE_Q35; data.variant = ".numamem"; - test_acpi_one(" -numa node -numa node,mem=128", &data); + test_acpi_one(" -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=128M" + " -numa node -numa node,memdev=ram0", &data); free_test_data(&data); } @@ -804,7 +815,8 @@ static void test_acpi_piix4_tcg_numamem(void) memset(&data, 0, sizeof(data)); data.machine = MACHINE_PC; data.variant = ".numamem"; - test_acpi_one(" -numa node -numa node,mem=128", &data); + test_acpi_one(" -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=128M" + " -numa node -numa node,memdev=ram0", &data); free_test_data(&data); } @@ -818,17 +830,21 @@ static void test_acpi_tcg_dimm_pxm(const char *machine) test_acpi_one(" -machine nvdimm=on,nvdimm-persistence=cpu" " -smp 4,sockets=4" " -m 128M,slots=3,maxmem=1G" - " -numa node,mem=32M,nodeid=0" - " -numa node,mem=32M,nodeid=1" - " -numa node,mem=32M,nodeid=2" - " -numa node,mem=32M,nodeid=3" + " -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=32M" + " -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=32M" + " -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram2,size=32M" + " -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram3,size=32M" + " -numa node,memdev=ram0,nodeid=0" + " -numa node,memdev=ram1,nodeid=1" + " -numa node,memdev=ram2,nodeid=2" + " -numa node,memdev=ram3,nodeid=3" " -numa cpu,node-id=0,socket-id=0" " -numa cpu,node-id=1,socket-id=1" " -numa cpu,node-id=2,socket-id=2" " -numa cpu,node-id=3,socket-id=3" - " -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=128M" + " -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram4,size=128M" " -object memory-backend-ram,id=nvm0,size=128M" - " -device pc-dimm,id=dimm0,memdev=ram0,node=1" + " -device pc-dimm,id=dimm0,memdev=ram4,node=1" " -device nvdimm,id=dimm1,memdev=nvm0,node=2", &data); free_test_data(&data); diff --git a/tests/numa-test.c b/tests/numa-test.c index 8de8581231..902e8de4d1 100644 --- a/tests/numa-test.c +++ b/tests/numa-test.c @@ -26,8 +26,10 @@ static void test_mon_explicit(const void *data) QTestState *qts; cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 8 " - "-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-3 " - "-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=4-7 "); + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M " + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M " + "-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-3,memdev=ram0 " + "-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=4-7,memdev=ram1 "); qts = qtest_init(cli); s = qtest_hmp(qts, "info numa"); @@ -45,7 +47,10 @@ static void test_mon_default(const void *data) char *cli; QTestState *qts; - cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 8 -numa node -numa node"); + cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 8 " + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M " + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M " + "-numa node,memdev=ram0 -numa node,memdev=ram1"); qts = qtest_init(cli); s = qtest_hmp(qts, "info numa"); @@ -64,8 +69,10 @@ static void test_mon_partial(const void *data) QTestState *qts; cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 8 " - "-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1 " - "-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=4-5 "); + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M " + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M " + "-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1,memdev=ram0 " + "-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=4-5,memdev=ram1"); qts = qtest_init(cli); s = qtest_hmp(qts, "info numa"); @@ -93,7 +100,11 @@ static void test_query_cpus(const void *data) QObject *e; QTestState *qts; - cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 8 -numa node,cpus=0-3 -numa node,cpus=4-7"); + cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 8 " + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M " + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M " + "-numa node,cpus=0-3,memdev=ram0 " + "-numa node,cpus=4-7,memdev=ram1"); qts = qtest_init(cli); cpus = get_cpus(qts, &resp); g_assert(cpus); @@ -132,7 +143,9 @@ static void pc_numa_cpu(const void *data) QTestState *qts; cli = make_cli(data, "-cpu pentium -smp 8,sockets=2,cores=2,threads=2 " - "-numa node,nodeid=0 -numa node,nodeid=1 " + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M " + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M " + "-numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=ram0 -numa node,nodeid=1,memdev=ram1 " "-numa cpu,node-id=1,socket-id=0 " "-numa cpu,node-id=0,socket-id=1,core-id=0 " "-numa cpu,node-id=0,socket-id=1,core-id=1,thread-id=0 " @@ -186,7 +199,9 @@ static void spapr_numa_cpu(const void *data) QTestState *qts; cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 4,cores=4 " - "-numa node,nodeid=0 -numa node,nodeid=1 " + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M " + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M " + "-numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=ram0 -numa node,nodeid=1,memdev=ram1 " "-numa cpu,node-id=0,core-id=0 " "-numa cpu,node-id=0,core-id=1 " "-numa cpu,node-id=0,core-id=2 " @@ -232,7 +247,9 @@ static void aarch64_numa_cpu(const void *data) QTestState *qts; cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 2 " - "-numa node,nodeid=0 -numa node,nodeid=1 " + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M " + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M " + "-numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=ram0 -numa node,nodeid=1,memdev=ram1 " "-numa cpu,node-id=1,thread-id=0 " "-numa cpu,node-id=0,thread-id=1"); qts = qtest_init(cli); @@ -274,14 +291,16 @@ static void pc_dynamic_cpu_cfg(const void *data) QList *cpus; QTestState *qs; - qs = qtest_initf("%s -nodefaults --preconfig -smp 2", + qs = qtest_initf("%s -nodefaults --preconfig -smp 2 " + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=64M " + "-object memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=64M", data ? (char *)data : ""); /* create 2 numa nodes */ g_assert(!qmp_rsp_is_err(qtest_qmp(qs, "{ 'execute': 'set-numa-node'," - " 'arguments': { 'type': 'node', 'nodeid': 0 } }"))); + " 'arguments': { 'type': 'node', 'nodeid': 0, 'memdev': 'ram0' } }"))); g_assert(!qmp_rsp_is_err(qtest_qmp(qs, "{ 'execute': 'set-numa-node'," - " 'arguments': { 'type': 'node', 'nodeid': 1 } }"))); + " 'arguments': { 'type': 'node', 'nodeid': 1, 'memdev': 'ram1' } }"))); /* map 2 cpus in non default reverse order * i.e socket1->node0, socket0->node1
it will test preferred memdev option more extensively and remove undesired deprecation warnings during 'make check' Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> --- tests/bios-tables-test.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- tests/numa-test.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)