From patchwork Thu Jul 25 02:44:04 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: James Simmons X-Patchwork-Id: 11057841 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91EB746 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 02:44:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D47287C2 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 02:44:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id CBBD0288AA; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 02:44:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from pdx1-mailman02.dreamhost.com (pdx1-mailman02.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85E41287C2 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 02:44:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-mailman02.dreamhost.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by pdx1-mailman02.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42704C438B; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 19:44:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org Delivered-To: lustre-devel-lustre.org@pdx1-mailman02.dreamhost.com Received: from smtp4.ccs.ornl.gov (smtp4.ccs.ornl.gov [160.91.203.40]) by pdx1-mailman02.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8544C3F10 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 19:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from star.ccs.ornl.gov (star.ccs.ornl.gov [160.91.202.134]) by smtp4.ccs.ornl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AAAD100537F; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 22:44:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by star.ccs.ornl.gov (Postfix, from userid 2004) id 708E09BF; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 22:44:11 -0400 (EDT) From: James Simmons To: Andreas Dilger , Oleg Drokin , NeilBrown , Shaun Tancheff Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 22:44:04 -0400 Message-Id: <1564022647-17351-6-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1564022647-17351-1-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org> References: <1564022647-17351-1-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org> Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 5/8] lustre: fld: retry fld rpc until the import is closed X-BeenThere: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "For discussing Lustre software development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Wang Di , Lustre Development List MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: lustre-devel-bounces@lists.lustre.org Sender: "lustre-devel" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Wang Di Since LWP is not replayable, it should retry RPC until the import is closed, otherwise it would cause unnecessary failure of the application. WC-bug-id: https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-5312 Lustre-commit: 07d481957c16832c782bb7d0c1fc436bcb148ea6 Signed-off-by: Wang Di Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/11039 Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger Reviewed-by: Fan Yong Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin --- fs/lustre/fld/fld_request.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/lustre/fld/fld_request.c b/fs/lustre/fld/fld_request.c index ba0ef82..60e7105 100644 --- a/fs/lustre/fld/fld_request.c +++ b/fs/lustre/fld/fld_request.c @@ -367,12 +367,10 @@ int fld_client_rpc(struct obd_export *exp, rc = ptlrpc_queue_wait(req); obd_put_request_slot(&exp->exp_obd->u.cli); if (rc != 0) { - if (rc == -EWOULDBLOCK || rc == -ESHUTDOWN) { - /* For no_delay req(see above), EWOULDBLOCK and - * ESHUTDOWN means the connection is being evicted, - * but this seq lookup should not return error, - * since it would cause unecessary failure of the - * application, instead it should retry here + if (imp->imp_state != LUSTRE_IMP_CLOSED) { + /* Since LWP is not replayable, so it will keep + * trying unless umount happens, otherwise it would + * cause unecessary failure of the application. */ ptlrpc_req_finished(req); goto again;