Message ID | 20190805164430.27121-1-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | passthrough/amd: Drop "IOMMU not found" message | expand |
On 05.08.2019 18:44, Andrew Cooper wrote: > Since c/s 9fa94e10585 "x86/ACPI: also parse AMD IOMMU tables early", this > function is unconditionally called in all cases where a DMAR ACPI table > doesn't exist. > > As a consequnce, "AMD-Vi: IOMMU not found!" is printed in all cases where an > IOMMU isn't present, even on non-AMD systems. Oh, I didn't even notice this yet. > Drop the message - it isn't > terribly interesting anyway, and is now misleading is a number of common > cases. Plus there's no VT-d side equivalent message. Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Jan
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 05:44:30PM +0100, Andy Cooper wrote: > Since c/s 9fa94e10585 "x86/ACPI: also parse AMD IOMMU tables early", this > function is unconditionally called in all cases where a DMAR ACPI table > doesn't exist. > > As a consequnce, "AMD-Vi: IOMMU not found!" is printed in all cases where an > IOMMU isn't present, even on non-AMD systems. Drop the message - it isn't > terribly interesting anyway, and is now misleading is a number of common > cases. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> Acked-by: Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com> > --- > CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> > CC: Wei Liu <wl@xen.org> > CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> > CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> > CC: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> > CC: Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com> > --- > xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/pci_amd_iommu.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/pci_amd_iommu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/pci_amd_iommu.c > index b3e1933b53..3bcfcc8404 100644 > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/pci_amd_iommu.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/pci_amd_iommu.c > @@ -155,7 +155,6 @@ int __init acpi_ivrs_init(void) > > if ( (amd_iommu_detect_acpi() !=0) || (iommu_found() == 0) ) > { > - printk("AMD-Vi: IOMMU not found!\n"); > iommu_intremap = 0; > return -ENODEV; > } > -- > 2.11.0 >
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/pci_amd_iommu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/pci_amd_iommu.c index b3e1933b53..3bcfcc8404 100644 --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/pci_amd_iommu.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/pci_amd_iommu.c @@ -155,7 +155,6 @@ int __init acpi_ivrs_init(void) if ( (amd_iommu_detect_acpi() !=0) || (iommu_found() == 0) ) { - printk("AMD-Vi: IOMMU not found!\n"); iommu_intremap = 0; return -ENODEV; }
Since c/s 9fa94e10585 "x86/ACPI: also parse AMD IOMMU tables early", this function is unconditionally called in all cases where a DMAR ACPI table doesn't exist. As a consequnce, "AMD-Vi: IOMMU not found!" is printed in all cases where an IOMMU isn't present, even on non-AMD systems. Drop the message - it isn't terribly interesting anyway, and is now misleading is a number of common cases. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> --- CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> CC: Wei Liu <wl@xen.org> CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> CC: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> CC: Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com> --- xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/pci_amd_iommu.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)