@@ -586,6 +586,7 @@ ssize_t nfs_file_direct_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
l_ctx = nfs_get_lock_context(dreq->ctx);
if (IS_ERR(l_ctx)) {
result = PTR_ERR(l_ctx);
+ nfs_direct_req_release(dreq);
goto out_release;
}
dreq->l_ctx = l_ctx;
@@ -1014,6 +1015,7 @@ ssize_t nfs_file_direct_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
l_ctx = nfs_get_lock_context(dreq->ctx);
if (IS_ERR(l_ctx)) {
result = PTR_ERR(l_ctx);
+ nfs_direct_req_release(dreq);
goto out_release;
}
dreq->l_ctx = l_ctx;
When dreq is allocated by nfs_direct_req_alloc(), dreq->kref is initialized to 2. Therefore we need to call nfs_direct_req_release() twice to release the allocated dreq. Usually it is called in nfs_file_direct_{read, write}() and nfs_direct_complete(). However, current code only calls nfs_direct_req_relese() once if nfs_get_lock_context() fails in nfs_file_direct_{read, write}(). So, that case would result in memory leak. Fix this by adding the missing call. Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> --- Hello, I noticed this when reading the code. Thanks. fs/nfs/direct.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)