| Message ID | 20190903190545.31852-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/3] drm/atomic: Reject FLIP_ASYNC unconditionally | expand |
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c index 5a5b42db6f2a..7a26bfb5329c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c @@ -1305,8 +1305,7 @@ int drm_mode_atomic_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, if (arg->reserved) return -EINVAL; - if ((arg->flags & DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_ASYNC) && - !dev->mode_config.async_page_flip) + if (arg->flags & DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_ASYNC) return -EINVAL; /* can't test and expect an event at the same time. */
It's never been wired up. Only userspace that tried to use it (and didn't actually check whether anything works, but hey it builds) is the -modesetting atomic implementation. And we just shut that up. If there's anyone else then we need to silently accept this flag no matter what, and find a new one. Because once a flag is tainted, it's lost. Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> Cc: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com> Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)