Message ID | 20190925020158.751492-2-alexhenrie24@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | scan-build fixes | expand |
On 9/24/2019 10:01 PM, Alex Henrie wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com> > --- > commit-graph.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/commit-graph.c b/commit-graph.c > index 9b02d2c426..659f4bb4f4 100644 > --- a/commit-graph.c > +++ b/commit-graph.c > @@ -1534,7 +1534,6 @@ static void split_graph_merge_strategy(struct write_commit_graph_context *ctx) > size_mult = ctx->split_opts->size_multiple; > } > > - g = ctx->r->objects->commit_graph; > ctx->num_commit_graphs_after = ctx->num_commit_graphs_before + 1; > > while (g && (g->num_commits <= size_mult * num_commits || Could we instead remove the assignment during the declaration? It is easier to know the while loop will work if the assignment is closer to the loop. Thanks, -Stolee
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 7:02 AM Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> wrote: > > Could we instead remove the assignment during the declaration? It is > easier to know the while loop will work if the assignment is closer > to the loop. Sure, that's fine. I'll send a v2 with that change. -Alex
diff --git a/commit-graph.c b/commit-graph.c index 9b02d2c426..659f4bb4f4 100644 --- a/commit-graph.c +++ b/commit-graph.c @@ -1534,7 +1534,6 @@ static void split_graph_merge_strategy(struct write_commit_graph_context *ctx) size_mult = ctx->split_opts->size_multiple; } - g = ctx->r->objects->commit_graph; ctx->num_commit_graphs_after = ctx->num_commit_graphs_before + 1; while (g && (g->num_commits <= size_mult * num_commits ||
Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com> --- commit-graph.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)