Message ID | 1570116271-8038-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [kvm-unit-tests] vmexit: measure IPI and EOI cost | expand |
On 10/3/19 8:24 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 00:00, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> > --- > x86/vmexit.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/x86/vmexit.c b/x86/vmexit.c > index 66d3458..81b743b 100644 > --- a/x86/vmexit.c > +++ b/x86/vmexit.c > @@ -65,22 +65,30 @@ static void nop(void *junk) > } > > volatile int x = 0; > +volatile uint64_t tsc_eoi = 0; > +volatile uint64_t tsc_ipi = 0; > > static void self_ipi_isr(isr_regs_t *regs) > { > x++; > + uint64_t start = rdtsc(); > eoi(); > + tsc_eoi += rdtsc() - start; > } > > static void x2apic_self_ipi(int vec) > { > + uint64_t start = rdtsc(); > wrmsr(0x83f, vec); > + tsc_ipi += rdtsc() - start; > } > > static void apic_self_ipi(int vec) > { > + uint64_t start = rdtsc(); > apic_icr_write(APIC_INT_ASSERT | APIC_DEST_SELF | APIC_DEST_PHYSICAL | > APIC_DM_FIXED | IPI_TEST_VECTOR, vec); > + tsc_ipi += rdtsc() - start; > } > > static void self_ipi_sti_nop(void) > @@ -180,7 +188,9 @@ static void x2apic_self_ipi_tpr_sti_hlt(void) > > static void ipi(void) > { > + uint64_t start = rdtsc(); > on_cpu(1, nop, 0); > + tsc_ipi += rdtsc() - start; > } > > static void ipi_halt(void) > @@ -511,6 +521,7 @@ static bool do_test(struct test *test) > } > > do { > + tsc_eoi = tsc_ipi = 0; > iterations *= 2; > t1 = rdtsc(); > > @@ -523,6 +534,11 @@ static bool do_test(struct test *test) > t2 = rdtsc(); > } while ((t2 - t1) < GOAL); > printf("%s %d\n", test->name, (int)((t2 - t1) / iterations)); > + if (tsc_ipi) > + printf(" ipi %s %d\n", test->name, (int)(tsc_ipi / iterations)); > + if (tsc_eoi) > + printf(" eoi %s %d\n", test->name, (int)(tsc_eoi / iterations)); > + > return test->next; > } Thanks for this, do you have more idea to optimize the virtual ipi latency? Wanpeng
On 08/10/19 05:32, Wanpeng Li wrote: > On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 00:00, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> >> --- >> x86/vmexit.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/x86/vmexit.c b/x86/vmexit.c >> index 66d3458..81b743b 100644 >> --- a/x86/vmexit.c >> +++ b/x86/vmexit.c >> @@ -65,22 +65,30 @@ static void nop(void *junk) >> } >> >> volatile int x = 0; >> +volatile uint64_t tsc_eoi = 0; >> +volatile uint64_t tsc_ipi = 0; >> >> static void self_ipi_isr(isr_regs_t *regs) >> { >> x++; >> + uint64_t start = rdtsc(); >> eoi(); >> + tsc_eoi += rdtsc() - start; >> } >> >> static void x2apic_self_ipi(int vec) >> { >> + uint64_t start = rdtsc(); >> wrmsr(0x83f, vec); >> + tsc_ipi += rdtsc() - start; >> } >> >> static void apic_self_ipi(int vec) >> { >> + uint64_t start = rdtsc(); >> apic_icr_write(APIC_INT_ASSERT | APIC_DEST_SELF | APIC_DEST_PHYSICAL | >> APIC_DM_FIXED | IPI_TEST_VECTOR, vec); >> + tsc_ipi += rdtsc() - start; >> } >> >> static void self_ipi_sti_nop(void) >> @@ -180,7 +188,9 @@ static void x2apic_self_ipi_tpr_sti_hlt(void) >> >> static void ipi(void) >> { >> + uint64_t start = rdtsc(); >> on_cpu(1, nop, 0); >> + tsc_ipi += rdtsc() - start; >> } >> >> static void ipi_halt(void) >> @@ -511,6 +521,7 @@ static bool do_test(struct test *test) >> } >> >> do { >> + tsc_eoi = tsc_ipi = 0; >> iterations *= 2; >> t1 = rdtsc(); >> >> @@ -523,6 +534,11 @@ static bool do_test(struct test *test) >> t2 = rdtsc(); >> } while ((t2 - t1) < GOAL); >> printf("%s %d\n", test->name, (int)((t2 - t1) / iterations)); >> + if (tsc_ipi) >> + printf(" ipi %s %d\n", test->name, (int)(tsc_ipi / iterations)); >> + if (tsc_eoi) >> + printf(" eoi %s %d\n", test->name, (int)(tsc_eoi / iterations)); >> + >> return test->next; >> } > > Thanks for this, do you have more idea to optimize the virtual ipi latency? I haven't thought about it recently; this was a patch I had written years ago and I randomly found on my computer. :) Paolo
diff --git a/x86/vmexit.c b/x86/vmexit.c index 66d3458..81b743b 100644 --- a/x86/vmexit.c +++ b/x86/vmexit.c @@ -65,22 +65,30 @@ static void nop(void *junk) } volatile int x = 0; +volatile uint64_t tsc_eoi = 0; +volatile uint64_t tsc_ipi = 0; static void self_ipi_isr(isr_regs_t *regs) { x++; + uint64_t start = rdtsc(); eoi(); + tsc_eoi += rdtsc() - start; } static void x2apic_self_ipi(int vec) { + uint64_t start = rdtsc(); wrmsr(0x83f, vec); + tsc_ipi += rdtsc() - start; } static void apic_self_ipi(int vec) { + uint64_t start = rdtsc(); apic_icr_write(APIC_INT_ASSERT | APIC_DEST_SELF | APIC_DEST_PHYSICAL | APIC_DM_FIXED | IPI_TEST_VECTOR, vec); + tsc_ipi += rdtsc() - start; } static void self_ipi_sti_nop(void) @@ -180,7 +188,9 @@ static void x2apic_self_ipi_tpr_sti_hlt(void) static void ipi(void) { + uint64_t start = rdtsc(); on_cpu(1, nop, 0); + tsc_ipi += rdtsc() - start; } static void ipi_halt(void) @@ -511,6 +521,7 @@ static bool do_test(struct test *test) } do { + tsc_eoi = tsc_ipi = 0; iterations *= 2; t1 = rdtsc(); @@ -523,6 +534,11 @@ static bool do_test(struct test *test) t2 = rdtsc(); } while ((t2 - t1) < GOAL); printf("%s %d\n", test->name, (int)((t2 - t1) / iterations)); + if (tsc_ipi) + printf(" ipi %s %d\n", test->name, (int)(tsc_ipi / iterations)); + if (tsc_eoi) + printf(" eoi %s %d\n", test->name, (int)(tsc_eoi / iterations)); + return test->next; }
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> --- x86/vmexit.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)