[4.19,061/106] PCI: rockchip: Propagate errors for optional regulators
diff mbox series

Message ID 20191006171149.476262829@linuxfoundation.org
State New
Headers show
Series
  • Untitled series #183371
Related show

Commit Message

Greg KH Oct. 6, 2019, 5:21 p.m. UTC
From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>

[ Upstream commit 0e3ff0ac5f71bdb6be2a698de0ed0c7e6e738269 ]

regulator_get_optional() can fail for a number of reasons besides probe
deferral. It can for example return -ENOMEM if it runs out of memory as
it tries to allocate data structures. Propagating only -EPROBE_DEFER is
problematic because it results in these legitimately fatal errors being
treated as "regulator not specified in DT".

What we really want is to ignore the optional regulators only if they
have not been specified in DT. regulator_get_optional() returns -ENODEV
in this case, so that's the special case that we need to handle. So we
propagate all errors, except -ENODEV, so that real failures will still
cause the driver to fail probe.

Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Comments

Pavel Machek Oct. 8, 2019, 12:24 p.m. UTC | #1
On Sun 2019-10-06 19:21:07, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> 
> [ Upstream commit 0e3ff0ac5f71bdb6be2a698de0ed0c7e6e738269 ]
> 
> regulator_get_optional() can fail for a number of reasons besides probe
> deferral. It can for example return -ENOMEM if it runs out of memory as
> it tries to allocate data structures. Propagating only -EPROBE_DEFER is
> problematic because it results in these legitimately fatal errors being
> treated as "regulator not specified in DT".
> 
> What we really want is to ignore the optional regulators only if they
> have not been specified in DT. regulator_get_optional() returns -ENODEV
> in this case, so that's the special case that we need to handle. So we
> propagate all errors, except -ENODEV, so that real failures will still
> cause the driver to fail probe.

61,62,63,64: Is this fixing any real bug? Why is it suitable for
-stable?

								Pavel

> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
> @@ -608,29 +608,29 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_parse_host_dt(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  
>  	rockchip->vpcie12v = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vpcie12v");
>  	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie12v)) {
> -		if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie12v) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> -			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +		if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie12v) != -ENODEV)
> +			return PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie12v);
>  		dev_info(dev, "no vpcie12v regulator found\n");
>  	}
>  
>  	rockchip->vpcie3v3 = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vpcie3v3");
>  	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3)) {
> -		if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> -			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +		if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3) != -ENODEV)
> +			return PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3);
>  		dev_info(dev, "no vpcie3v3 regulator found\n");
>  	}
>  
>  	rockchip->vpcie1v8 = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vpcie1v8");
>  	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8)) {
> -		if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> -			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +		if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8) != -ENODEV)
> +			return PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
>  		dev_info(dev, "no vpcie1v8 regulator found\n");
>  	}
>  
>  	rockchip->vpcie0v9 = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vpcie0v9");
>  	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9)) {
> -		if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> -			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +		if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9) != -ENODEV)
> +			return PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>  		dev_info(dev, "no vpcie0v9 regulator found\n");
>  	}
>

Patch
diff mbox series

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
index 1372d270764f9..5ce8e63756875 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
@@ -608,29 +608,29 @@  static int rockchip_pcie_parse_host_dt(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
 
 	rockchip->vpcie12v = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vpcie12v");
 	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie12v)) {
-		if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie12v) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
-			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+		if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie12v) != -ENODEV)
+			return PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie12v);
 		dev_info(dev, "no vpcie12v regulator found\n");
 	}
 
 	rockchip->vpcie3v3 = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vpcie3v3");
 	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3)) {
-		if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
-			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+		if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3) != -ENODEV)
+			return PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3);
 		dev_info(dev, "no vpcie3v3 regulator found\n");
 	}
 
 	rockchip->vpcie1v8 = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vpcie1v8");
 	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8)) {
-		if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
-			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+		if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8) != -ENODEV)
+			return PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
 		dev_info(dev, "no vpcie1v8 regulator found\n");
 	}
 
 	rockchip->vpcie0v9 = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vpcie0v9");
 	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9)) {
-		if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
-			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+		if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9) != -ENODEV)
+			return PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
 		dev_info(dev, "no vpcie0v9 regulator found\n");
 	}