diff mbox series

[08/13] cpuidle: psci: Prepare to use OS initiated suspend mode via PM domains

Message ID 20191010113937.15962-9-ulf.hansson@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series cpuidle: psci: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement | expand

Commit Message

Ulf Hansson Oct. 10, 2019, 11:39 a.m. UTC
The per CPU variable psci_power_state, contains an array of fixed values,
which reflects the corresponding arm,psci-suspend-param parsed from DT, for
each of the available CPU idle states.

This isn't sufficient when using the hierarchical CPU topology in DT, in
combination with having PSCI OS initiated (OSI) mode enabled. More
precisely, in OSI mode, Linux is responsible of telling the PSCI FW what
idle state the cluster (a group of CPUs) should enter, while in PSCI
Platform Coordinated (PC) mode, each CPU independently votes for an idle
state of the cluster.

For this reason, introduce a per CPU variable called domain_state and
implement two helper functions to read/write its value. Then let the
domain_state take precedence over the regular selected state, when idling
the CPU in psci_enter_idle_state().

This allows subsequent patches that implements support for PM domains for
cpuidle-psci, to write the selected idle state parameter for the cluster
into the domain_state variable. Furthermore, let's share the needed
functions in a header file, to enable the support for PM domains to be
implemented in a separate c-file.

Co-developed-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.h | 11 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.h

Comments

Sudeep Holla Oct. 24, 2019, 3:42 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 01:39:32PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> The per CPU variable psci_power_state, contains an array of fixed values,
> which reflects the corresponding arm,psci-suspend-param parsed from DT, for
> each of the available CPU idle states.
>
> This isn't sufficient when using the hierarchical CPU topology in DT, in
> combination with having PSCI OS initiated (OSI) mode enabled. More
> precisely, in OSI mode, Linux is responsible of telling the PSCI FW what
> idle state the cluster (a group of CPUs) should enter, while in PSCI
> Platform Coordinated (PC) mode, each CPU independently votes for an idle
> state of the cluster.
>
> For this reason, introduce a per CPU variable called domain_state and
> implement two helper functions to read/write its value. Then let the
> domain_state take precedence over the regular selected state, when idling
> the CPU in psci_enter_idle_state().
>
> This allows subsequent patches that implements support for PM domains for
> cpuidle-psci, to write the selected idle state parameter for the cluster
> into the domain_state variable. Furthermore, let's share the needed
> functions in a header file, to enable the support for PM domains to be
> implemented in a separate c-file.
>
> Co-developed-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.h | 11 +++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
> index 5c30f23a8a7b..a16467daf99d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
> @@ -20,17 +20,42 @@
>
>  #include <asm/cpuidle.h>
>
> +#include "cpuidle-psci.h"
>  #include "dt_idle_states.h"
>
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(u32 *, psci_power_state);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u32, domain_state);
> +

[nit] for me name 'domain_state' is per domain and for one each in the
hierarchical topology. But here it's per cpu, just wondering if we can
rename it to provide implicit meaning ?

> +void psci_set_domain_state(u32 state)
> +{
> +	__this_cpu_write(domain_state, state);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 psci_get_domain_state(void)
> +{
> +	return __this_cpu_read(domain_state);
> +}
> +
> +static int __psci_enter_idle_state(int idx, u32 state)
> +{
> +	return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(psci_cpu_suspend_enter, idx, state);
> +}
>
>  static int psci_enter_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>  				struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int idx)
>  {
> +	int ret;
>  	u32 *states = __this_cpu_read(psci_power_state);
> -	u32 state = idx ? states[idx - 1] : 0;
> +	u32 state = psci_get_domain_state();
>
> -	return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(psci_cpu_suspend_enter, idx, state);
> +	if (!state && idx)
> +		state = states[idx - 1];

This can go as mentioned earlier once we have entry for WFI also.

> +
> +	ret = __psci_enter_idle_state(idx, state);
> +
> +	/* Clear the domain state to start fresh when back from idle. */
> +	psci_set_domain_state(0);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>
>  static struct cpuidle_driver psci_idle_driver __initdata = {
> @@ -56,7 +81,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id psci_idle_state_match[] __initconst = {
>  	{ },
>  };
>
> -static int __init psci_dt_parse_state_node(struct device_node *np, u32 *state)
> +int __init psci_dt_parse_state_node(struct device_node *np, u32 *state)

Can this me made part of patch that uses it instead of here ?

--
Regards,
Sudeep
Ulf Hansson Oct. 24, 2019, 5:01 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 17:42, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 01:39:32PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > The per CPU variable psci_power_state, contains an array of fixed values,
> > which reflects the corresponding arm,psci-suspend-param parsed from DT, for
> > each of the available CPU idle states.
> >
> > This isn't sufficient when using the hierarchical CPU topology in DT, in
> > combination with having PSCI OS initiated (OSI) mode enabled. More
> > precisely, in OSI mode, Linux is responsible of telling the PSCI FW what
> > idle state the cluster (a group of CPUs) should enter, while in PSCI
> > Platform Coordinated (PC) mode, each CPU independently votes for an idle
> > state of the cluster.
> >
> > For this reason, introduce a per CPU variable called domain_state and
> > implement two helper functions to read/write its value. Then let the
> > domain_state take precedence over the regular selected state, when idling
> > the CPU in psci_enter_idle_state().
> >
> > This allows subsequent patches that implements support for PM domains for
> > cpuidle-psci, to write the selected idle state parameter for the cluster
> > into the domain_state variable. Furthermore, let's share the needed
> > functions in a header file, to enable the support for PM domains to be
> > implemented in a separate c-file.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.h | 11 +++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.h
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
> > index 5c30f23a8a7b..a16467daf99d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
> > @@ -20,17 +20,42 @@
> >
> >  #include <asm/cpuidle.h>
> >
> > +#include "cpuidle-psci.h"
> >  #include "dt_idle_states.h"
> >
> >  static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(u32 *, psci_power_state);
> > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u32, domain_state);
> > +
>
> [nit] for me name 'domain_state' is per domain and for one each in the
> hierarchical topology. But here it's per cpu, just wondering if we can
> rename it to provide implicit meaning ?

Feel free to suggest something. I couldn't find any better. :-)

>
> > +void psci_set_domain_state(u32 state)
> > +{
> > +     __this_cpu_write(domain_state, state);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline u32 psci_get_domain_state(void)
> > +{
> > +     return __this_cpu_read(domain_state);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __psci_enter_idle_state(int idx, u32 state)
> > +{
> > +     return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(psci_cpu_suspend_enter, idx, state);
> > +}
> >
> >  static int psci_enter_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> >                               struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int idx)
> >  {
> > +     int ret;
> >       u32 *states = __this_cpu_read(psci_power_state);
> > -     u32 state = idx ? states[idx - 1] : 0;
> > +     u32 state = psci_get_domain_state();
> >
> > -     return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(psci_cpu_suspend_enter, idx, state);
> > +     if (!state && idx)
> > +             state = states[idx - 1];
>
> This can go as mentioned earlier once we have entry for WFI also.
>
> > +
> > +     ret = __psci_enter_idle_state(idx, state);
> > +
> > +     /* Clear the domain state to start fresh when back from idle. */
> > +     psci_set_domain_state(0);
> > +     return ret;
> >  }
> >
> >  static struct cpuidle_driver psci_idle_driver __initdata = {
> > @@ -56,7 +81,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id psci_idle_state_match[] __initconst = {
> >       { },
> >  };
> >
> > -static int __init psci_dt_parse_state_node(struct device_node *np, u32 *state)
> > +int __init psci_dt_parse_state_node(struct device_node *np, u32 *state)
>
> Can this me made part of patch that uses it instead of here ?

Sure, just wanted to keep the all the preparations for the PM domains
support together.

But you have a point, let me move this part to the patch that needs it.

Kind regards
Uffe
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
index 5c30f23a8a7b..a16467daf99d 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
@@ -20,17 +20,42 @@ 
 
 #include <asm/cpuidle.h>
 
+#include "cpuidle-psci.h"
 #include "dt_idle_states.h"
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(u32 *, psci_power_state);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u32, domain_state);
+
+void psci_set_domain_state(u32 state)
+{
+	__this_cpu_write(domain_state, state);
+}
+
+static inline u32 psci_get_domain_state(void)
+{
+	return __this_cpu_read(domain_state);
+}
+
+static int __psci_enter_idle_state(int idx, u32 state)
+{
+	return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(psci_cpu_suspend_enter, idx, state);
+}
 
 static int psci_enter_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
 				struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int idx)
 {
+	int ret;
 	u32 *states = __this_cpu_read(psci_power_state);
-	u32 state = idx ? states[idx - 1] : 0;
+	u32 state = psci_get_domain_state();
 
-	return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(psci_cpu_suspend_enter, idx, state);
+	if (!state && idx)
+		state = states[idx - 1];
+
+	ret = __psci_enter_idle_state(idx, state);
+
+	/* Clear the domain state to start fresh when back from idle. */
+	psci_set_domain_state(0);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static struct cpuidle_driver psci_idle_driver __initdata = {
@@ -56,7 +81,7 @@  static const struct of_device_id psci_idle_state_match[] __initconst = {
 	{ },
 };
 
-static int __init psci_dt_parse_state_node(struct device_node *np, u32 *state)
+int __init psci_dt_parse_state_node(struct device_node *np, u32 *state)
 {
 	int err = of_property_read_u32(np, "arm,psci-suspend-param", state);
 
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.h b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e593de1784c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.h
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ 
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+
+#ifndef __CPUIDLE_PSCI_H
+#define __CPUIDLE_PSCI_H
+
+struct device_node;
+
+void psci_set_domain_state(u32 state);
+int __init psci_dt_parse_state_node(struct device_node *np, u32 *state);
+
+#endif /* __CPUIDLE_PSCI_H */