From patchwork Wed Oct 30 01:27:12 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kuninori Morimoto X-Patchwork-Id: 11218901 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4498614DB for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 01:35:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBF5C2086A for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 01:35:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="N6L2sQwJ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CBF5C2086A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=renesas.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1483A22ED; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 02:34:48 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 1483A22ED DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1572399338; bh=RTtyV9Gtcbga1vcWI1XL82dLoTCDTBSBl6OOqixHkLs=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=N6L2sQwJYusGvE7997S7Ngkj5BiG49CDnrC7wPsyxtGweKKkEzeQwRrtT+pgJS9A2 3KxCTH4pEc5IOWvSxjzpsY30ZPnum3x8ejCngoDw73kNRT+FBiZv5zhMZubE6kqUMS WnDY4EeHo52ejCxbKEzbdLygMfg5b/RjN5O5GNBg= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE4CF8070D; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 02:27:18 +0100 (CET) X-Original-To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Delivered-To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 0BE6DF8070E; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 02:27:16 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on alsa1.perex.cz X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, SURBL_BLOCKED,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from relmlie5.idc.renesas.com (relmlor1.renesas.com [210.160.252.171]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A62F806F7 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 02:27:12 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz A7A62F806F7 Date: 30 Oct 2019 10:27:12 +0900 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,245,1569250800"; d="scan'208";a="30353597" Received: from unknown (HELO relmlir5.idc.renesas.com) ([10.200.68.151]) by relmlie5.idc.renesas.com with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2019 10:27:12 +0900 Received: from morimoto-PC.renesas.com (unknown [10.166.18.140]) by relmlir5.idc.renesas.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ACAF400A0F7; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 10:27:12 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <87lft3c9an.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> From: Kuninori Morimoto User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 To: Mark Brown In-Reply-To: <874kzrdo1x.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> References: <874kzrdo1x.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Cc: Linux-ALSA Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 resend 13/18] ASoC: soc-core: add snd_soc_unregister_dai() X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" From: Kuninori Morimoto It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming, like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc. But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc. It is easy to create bug at the such code, and is difficult to debug. This patch adds missing soc_del_dai() and snd_soc_unregister_dai(). Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto --- include/sound/soc.h | 1 + sound/soc/soc-core.c | 19 ++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/sound/soc.h b/include/sound/soc.h index 320dcd4..daa0e10 100644 --- a/include/sound/soc.h +++ b/include/sound/soc.h @@ -1328,6 +1328,7 @@ struct snd_soc_dai_link *snd_soc_find_dai_link(struct snd_soc_card *card, int snd_soc_register_dai(struct snd_soc_component *component, struct snd_soc_dai_driver *dai_drv); +void snd_soc_unregister_dai(struct snd_soc_dai *dai); struct snd_soc_dai *snd_soc_find_dai( const struct snd_soc_dai_link_component *dlc); diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c index 9595406..2b9dc11 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c @@ -2535,6 +2535,12 @@ static inline char *fmt_multiple_name(struct device *dev, return devm_kstrdup(dev, dai_drv->name, GFP_KERNEL); } +static void soc_del_dai(struct snd_soc_dai *dai) +{ + dev_dbg(dai->dev, "ASoC: Unregistered DAI '%s'\n", dai->name); + list_del(&dai->list); +} + /* Create a DAI and add it to the component's DAI list */ static struct snd_soc_dai *soc_add_dai(struct snd_soc_component *component, struct snd_soc_dai_driver *dai_drv, @@ -2584,6 +2590,12 @@ static struct snd_soc_dai *soc_add_dai(struct snd_soc_component *component, return dai; } +void snd_soc_unregister_dai(struct snd_soc_dai *dai) +{ + soc_del_dai(dai); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_unregister_dai); + /** * snd_soc_register_dai - Register a DAI dynamically & create its widgets * @@ -2636,11 +2648,8 @@ static void snd_soc_unregister_dais(struct snd_soc_component *component) { struct snd_soc_dai *dai, *_dai; - for_each_component_dais_safe(component, dai, _dai) { - dev_dbg(component->dev, "ASoC: Unregistered DAI '%s'\n", - dai->name); - list_del(&dai->list); - } + for_each_component_dais_safe(component, dai, _dai) + snd_soc_unregister_dai(dai); } /**