diff mbox series

[RFC] q800: fix I/O memory map

Message ID 20191031100341.3827-1-laurent@vivier.eu (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [RFC] q800: fix I/O memory map | expand

Commit Message

Laurent Vivier Oct. 31, 2019, 10:03 a.m. UTC
Linux kernel 5.4 will introduce a new memory map for SWIM device.
(aee6bff1c325 ("m68k: mac: Revisit floppy disc controller base addresses"))

Until this release all MMIO are mapped between 0x50f00000 and 0x50f40000,
but it appears that for real hardware 0x50f00000 is not the base address:
the MMIO region spans 0x50000000 through 0x60000000, and 0x50040000 through
0x54000000 is repeated images of 0x50000000 to 0x50040000.

Fixed: 04e7ca8d0f ("hw/m68k: define Macintosh Quadra 800")
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
---
 hw/m68k/q800.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Comments

Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Nov. 1, 2019, midnight UTC | #1
On 10/31/19 11:03 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Linux kernel 5.4 will introduce a new memory map for SWIM device.
> (aee6bff1c325 ("m68k: mac: Revisit floppy disc controller base addresses"))
> 
> Until this release all MMIO are mapped between 0x50f00000 and 0x50f40000,
> but it appears that for real hardware 0x50f00000 is not the base address:
> the MMIO region spans 0x50000000 through 0x60000000, and 0x50040000 through
> 0x54000000 is repeated images of 0x50000000 to 0x50040000.
> 
> Fixed: 04e7ca8d0f ("hw/m68k: define Macintosh Quadra 800")
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
> ---
>   hw/m68k/q800.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>   1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/m68k/q800.c b/hw/m68k/q800.c
> index 2b4842f8c6..8122e7c612 100644
> --- a/hw/m68k/q800.c
> +++ b/hw/m68k/q800.c
> @@ -60,14 +60,14 @@
>   #define MACH_MAC        3
>   #define Q800_MAC_CPU_ID 2
>   
> -#define VIA_BASE              0x50f00000
> -#define SONIC_PROM_BASE       0x50f08000
> -#define SONIC_BASE            0x50f0a000
> -#define SCC_BASE              0x50f0c020
> -#define ESP_BASE              0x50f10000
> -#define ESP_PDMA              0x50f10100
> -#define ASC_BASE              0x50F14000
> -#define SWIM_BASE             0x50F1E000
> +#define VIA_BASE              0x50000000
> +#define SONIC_PROM_BASE       0x50008000
> +#define SONIC_BASE            0x5000a000
> +#define SCC_BASE              0x5000c020
> +#define ESP_BASE              0x50010000
> +#define ESP_PDMA              0x50010100
> +#define ASC_BASE              0x50014000
> +#define SWIM_BASE             0x5001E000
>   #define NUBUS_SUPER_SLOT_BASE 0x60000000
>   #define NUBUS_SLOT_BASE       0xf0000000
>   
> @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ static void q800_init(MachineState *machine)
>       int32_t initrd_size;
>       MemoryRegion *rom;
>       MemoryRegion *ram;
> +    int i;
>       ram_addr_t ram_size = machine->ram_size;
>       const char *kernel_filename = machine->kernel_filename;
>       const char *initrd_filename = machine->initrd_filename;
> @@ -163,10 +164,26 @@ static void q800_init(MachineState *machine)
>       cpu = M68K_CPU(cpu_create(machine->cpu_type));
>       qemu_register_reset(main_cpu_reset, cpu);
>   
> +    /* RAM */
>       ram = g_malloc(sizeof(*ram));
>       memory_region_init_ram(ram, NULL, "m68k_mac.ram", ram_size, &error_abort);
>       memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), 0, ram);
>   
> +    /*
> +     * Memory from VIA_BASE to VIA_BASE + 0x40000 is repeated
> +     * from VIA_BASE + 0x40000 to VIA_BASE + 0x4000000
> +     */

Maybe:

        const size_t via_aliases_count = (0x4000000 / 0x40000) - 1;
        MemoryRegion *via_alias = g_new(MemoryRegion, via_aliases_count);
        for (size_t i = 0; i < via_aliases_count; i++) {

            ...

            memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(),
                                        VIA_BASE + (i + 1) * 0x40000,
                                        via_alias[i]);
            ...
        }

> +    for (i = 1; i < 256; i++) {
> +        MemoryRegion *io = g_malloc(sizeof(*io));
> +        char *name = g_strdup_printf("mac_m68k.io[%d]", i);
> +
> +        memory_region_init_alias(io, NULL, name, get_system_memory(),
> +                                 VIA_BASE, 0x40000);
> +        memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(),
> +                                    VIA_BASE + i * 0x40000, io);
> +        g_free(name);
> +    }

I'm trying to get ride of this pattern, so I plan to refactor this later 
(and will use 256*KiB). Anyway not this patch problem.

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>

> +
>       /* IRQ Glue */
>   
>       irq = g_new0(GLUEState, 1);
>
Laurent Vivier Nov. 2, 2019, 6:07 p.m. UTC | #2
Le 01/11/2019 à 01:00, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé a écrit :
> On 10/31/19 11:03 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Linux kernel 5.4 will introduce a new memory map for SWIM device.
>> (aee6bff1c325 ("m68k: mac: Revisit floppy disc controller base
>> addresses"))
>>
>> Until this release all MMIO are mapped between 0x50f00000 and 0x50f40000,
>> but it appears that for real hardware 0x50f00000 is not the base address:
>> the MMIO region spans 0x50000000 through 0x60000000, and 0x50040000
>> through
>> 0x54000000 is repeated images of 0x50000000 to 0x50040000.
>>
>> Fixed: 04e7ca8d0f ("hw/m68k: define Macintosh Quadra 800")
>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
>> ---
>>   hw/m68k/q800.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>   1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/m68k/q800.c b/hw/m68k/q800.c
>> index 2b4842f8c6..8122e7c612 100644
>> --- a/hw/m68k/q800.c
>> +++ b/hw/m68k/q800.c
>> @@ -60,14 +60,14 @@
>>   #define MACH_MAC        3
>>   #define Q800_MAC_CPU_ID 2
>>   -#define VIA_BASE              0x50f00000
>> -#define SONIC_PROM_BASE       0x50f08000
>> -#define SONIC_BASE            0x50f0a000
>> -#define SCC_BASE              0x50f0c020
>> -#define ESP_BASE              0x50f10000
>> -#define ESP_PDMA              0x50f10100
>> -#define ASC_BASE              0x50F14000
>> -#define SWIM_BASE             0x50F1E000
>> +#define VIA_BASE              0x50000000
>> +#define SONIC_PROM_BASE       0x50008000
>> +#define SONIC_BASE            0x5000a000
>> +#define SCC_BASE              0x5000c020
>> +#define ESP_BASE              0x50010000
>> +#define ESP_PDMA              0x50010100
>> +#define ASC_BASE              0x50014000
>> +#define SWIM_BASE             0x5001E000
>>   #define NUBUS_SUPER_SLOT_BASE 0x60000000
>>   #define NUBUS_SLOT_BASE       0xf0000000
>>   @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ static void q800_init(MachineState *machine)
>>       int32_t initrd_size;
>>       MemoryRegion *rom;
>>       MemoryRegion *ram;
>> +    int i;
>>       ram_addr_t ram_size = machine->ram_size;
>>       const char *kernel_filename = machine->kernel_filename;
>>       const char *initrd_filename = machine->initrd_filename;
>> @@ -163,10 +164,26 @@ static void q800_init(MachineState *machine)
>>       cpu = M68K_CPU(cpu_create(machine->cpu_type));
>>       qemu_register_reset(main_cpu_reset, cpu);
>>   +    /* RAM */
>>       ram = g_malloc(sizeof(*ram));
>>       memory_region_init_ram(ram, NULL, "m68k_mac.ram", ram_size,
>> &error_abort);
>>       memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), 0, ram);
>>   +    /*
>> +     * Memory from VIA_BASE to VIA_BASE + 0x40000 is repeated
>> +     * from VIA_BASE + 0x40000 to VIA_BASE + 0x4000000
>> +     */
> 
> Maybe:
> 
>        const size_t via_aliases_count = (0x4000000 / 0x40000) - 1;

good idea.

>        MemoryRegion *via_alias = g_new(MemoryRegion, via_aliases_count);

do we really need to store them?
We will not reuse them or free them.

>        for (size_t i = 0; i < via_aliases_count; i++) {
> 
>            ...
> 
>            memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(),
>                                        VIA_BASE + (i + 1) * 0x40000,
>                                        via_alias[i]);
>            ...
>        }
> 
>> +    for (i = 1; i < 256; i++) {
>> +        MemoryRegion *io = g_malloc(sizeof(*io));
>> +        char *name = g_strdup_printf("mac_m68k.io[%d]", i);
>> +
>> +        memory_region_init_alias(io, NULL, name, get_system_memory(),
>> +                                 VIA_BASE, 0x40000);
>> +        memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(),
>> +                                    VIA_BASE + i * 0x40000, io);
>> +        g_free(name);
>> +    }
> 
> I'm trying to get ride of this pattern, so I plan to refactor this later
> (and will use 256*KiB). Anyway not this patch problem.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> 
>> +
>>       /* IRQ Glue */
>>         irq = g_new0(GLUEState, 1);
>>

Thanks,
Laurent
Laurent Vivier Nov. 2, 2019, 6:10 p.m. UTC | #3
Paolo,

the RFC was mainly for you:

Is this the good way to replicate 256 times a memory chunk containing a
bunch of different MMIO spaces?

...
> +    /*
> +     * Memory from VIA_BASE to VIA_BASE + 0x40000 is repeated
> +     * from VIA_BASE + 0x40000 to VIA_BASE + 0x4000000
> +     */
> +    for (i = 1; i < 256; i++) {
> +        MemoryRegion *io = g_malloc(sizeof(*io));
> +        char *name = g_strdup_printf("mac_m68k.io[%d]", i);
> +
> +        memory_region_init_alias(io, NULL, name, get_system_memory(),
> +                                 VIA_BASE, 0x40000);
> +        memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(),
> +                                    VIA_BASE + i * 0x40000, io);
> +        g_free(name);
> +    }
> +
...
Thanks,
Laurent
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Nov. 2, 2019, 7:54 p.m. UTC | #4
On 11/2/19 7:10 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Paolo,
> 
> the RFC was mainly for you:
> 
> Is this the good way to replicate 256 times a memory chunk containing a
> bunch of different MMIO spaces?

I asked Richard about this and he said this is OK because this is
the FlatView memory tree. It is then optimized in AddressSpace
(see memory_region_transaction_commit). What matters in term of
performance are the AddressSpaces.

> ...
>> +    /*
>> +     * Memory from VIA_BASE to VIA_BASE + 0x40000 is repeated
>> +     * from VIA_BASE + 0x40000 to VIA_BASE + 0x4000000
>> +     */
>> +    for (i = 1; i < 256; i++) {
>> +        MemoryRegion *io = g_malloc(sizeof(*io));
>> +        char *name = g_strdup_printf("mac_m68k.io[%d]", i);
>> +
>> +        memory_region_init_alias(io, NULL, name, get_system_memory(),
>> +                                 VIA_BASE, 0x40000);
>> +        memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(),
>> +                                    VIA_BASE + i * 0x40000, io);
>> +        g_free(name);
>> +    }
>> +
> ...
> Thanks,
> Laurent
>
Laurent Vivier Nov. 2, 2019, 7:56 p.m. UTC | #5
Le 02/11/2019 à 20:54, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé a écrit :
> On 11/2/19 7:10 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Paolo,
>>
>> the RFC was mainly for you:
>>
>> Is this the good way to replicate 256 times a memory chunk containing a
>> bunch of different MMIO spaces?
> 
> I asked Richard about this and he said this is OK because this is
> the FlatView memory tree. It is then optimized in AddressSpace
> (see memory_region_transaction_commit). What matters in term of
> performance are the AddressSpaces.

Thank you Philippe.

Laurent
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/hw/m68k/q800.c b/hw/m68k/q800.c
index 2b4842f8c6..8122e7c612 100644
--- a/hw/m68k/q800.c
+++ b/hw/m68k/q800.c
@@ -60,14 +60,14 @@ 
 #define MACH_MAC        3
 #define Q800_MAC_CPU_ID 2
 
-#define VIA_BASE              0x50f00000
-#define SONIC_PROM_BASE       0x50f08000
-#define SONIC_BASE            0x50f0a000
-#define SCC_BASE              0x50f0c020
-#define ESP_BASE              0x50f10000
-#define ESP_PDMA              0x50f10100
-#define ASC_BASE              0x50F14000
-#define SWIM_BASE             0x50F1E000
+#define VIA_BASE              0x50000000
+#define SONIC_PROM_BASE       0x50008000
+#define SONIC_BASE            0x5000a000
+#define SCC_BASE              0x5000c020
+#define ESP_BASE              0x50010000
+#define ESP_PDMA              0x50010100
+#define ASC_BASE              0x50014000
+#define SWIM_BASE             0x5001E000
 #define NUBUS_SUPER_SLOT_BASE 0x60000000
 #define NUBUS_SLOT_BASE       0xf0000000
 
@@ -135,6 +135,7 @@  static void q800_init(MachineState *machine)
     int32_t initrd_size;
     MemoryRegion *rom;
     MemoryRegion *ram;
+    int i;
     ram_addr_t ram_size = machine->ram_size;
     const char *kernel_filename = machine->kernel_filename;
     const char *initrd_filename = machine->initrd_filename;
@@ -163,10 +164,26 @@  static void q800_init(MachineState *machine)
     cpu = M68K_CPU(cpu_create(machine->cpu_type));
     qemu_register_reset(main_cpu_reset, cpu);
 
+    /* RAM */
     ram = g_malloc(sizeof(*ram));
     memory_region_init_ram(ram, NULL, "m68k_mac.ram", ram_size, &error_abort);
     memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), 0, ram);
 
+    /*
+     * Memory from VIA_BASE to VIA_BASE + 0x40000 is repeated
+     * from VIA_BASE + 0x40000 to VIA_BASE + 0x4000000
+     */
+    for (i = 1; i < 256; i++) {
+        MemoryRegion *io = g_malloc(sizeof(*io));
+        char *name = g_strdup_printf("mac_m68k.io[%d]", i);
+
+        memory_region_init_alias(io, NULL, name, get_system_memory(),
+                                 VIA_BASE, 0x40000);
+        memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(),
+                                    VIA_BASE + i * 0x40000, io);
+        g_free(name);
+    }
+
     /* IRQ Glue */
 
     irq = g_new0(GLUEState, 1);