diff mbox series

[v4] qcow2-bitmap: Fix uint64_t left-shift overflow

Message ID 4ba40cd1e7ee4a708b40899952e49f22@h3c.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v4] qcow2-bitmap: Fix uint64_t left-shift overflow | expand

Commit Message

Tuguoyi Nov. 1, 2019, 7:37 a.m. UTC
There are two issues in In check_constraints_on_bitmap(),
1) The sanity check on the granularity will cause uint64_t
integer left-shift overflow when cluster_size is 2M and the
granularity is BIGGER than 32K.
2) The way to calculate image size that the maximum bitmap
supported can map to is a bit incorrect.
This patch fix it by add a helper function to calculate the
number of bytes needed by a normal bitmap in image and compare
it to the maximum bitmap bytes supported by qemu.

Fixes: 5f72826e7fc62167cf3a
Signed-off-by: Guoyi Tu <tu.guoyi@h3c.com>
---
 block/qcow2-bitmap.c | 14 +++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Nov. 1, 2019, 9:21 a.m. UTC | #1
01.11.2019 10:37, Tuguoyi wrote:
> There are two issues in In check_constraints_on_bitmap(),
> 1) The sanity check on the granularity will cause uint64_t
> integer left-shift overflow when cluster_size is 2M and the
> granularity is BIGGER than 32K.
> 2) The way to calculate image size that the maximum bitmap
> supported can map to is a bit incorrect.
> This patch fix it by add a helper function to calculate the
> number of bytes needed by a normal bitmap in image and compare
> it to the maximum bitmap bytes supported by qemu.
> 
> Fixes: 5f72826e7fc62167cf3a
> Signed-off-by: Guoyi Tu <tu.guoyi@h3c.com>

You forget my
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

(I don't see changes except add "Fixes: " to commit msg and put get_bitmap_bytes_needed
definition header into one line.)

> ---
>   block/qcow2-bitmap.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/qcow2-bitmap.c b/block/qcow2-bitmap.c
> index 98294a7..ef9ef62 100644
> --- a/block/qcow2-bitmap.c
> +++ b/block/qcow2-bitmap.c
> @@ -142,6 +142,13 @@ static int check_table_entry(uint64_t entry, int cluster_size)
>       return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static int64_t get_bitmap_bytes_needed(int64_t len, uint32_t granularity)
> +{
> +    int64_t num_bits = DIV_ROUND_UP(len, granularity);
> +
> +    return DIV_ROUND_UP(num_bits, 8);
> +}
> +
>   static int check_constraints_on_bitmap(BlockDriverState *bs,
>                                          const char *name,
>                                          uint32_t granularity,
> @@ -150,6 +157,7 @@ static int check_constraints_on_bitmap(BlockDriverState *bs,
>       BDRVQcow2State *s = bs->opaque;
>       int granularity_bits = ctz32(granularity);
>       int64_t len = bdrv_getlength(bs);
> +    int64_t bitmap_bytes;
>   
>       assert(granularity > 0);
>       assert((granularity & (granularity - 1)) == 0);
> @@ -171,9 +179,9 @@ static int check_constraints_on_bitmap(BlockDriverState *bs,
>           return -EINVAL;
>       }
>   
> -    if ((len > (uint64_t)BME_MAX_PHYS_SIZE << granularity_bits) ||
> -        (len > (uint64_t)BME_MAX_TABLE_SIZE * s->cluster_size <<
> -               granularity_bits))
> +    bitmap_bytes = get_bitmap_bytes_needed(len, granularity);
> +    if ((bitmap_bytes > (uint64_t)BME_MAX_PHYS_SIZE) ||
> +        (bitmap_bytes > (uint64_t)BME_MAX_TABLE_SIZE * s->cluster_size))
>       {
>           error_setg(errp, "Too much space will be occupied by the bitmap. "
>                      "Use larger granularity");
>
Tuguoyi Nov. 1, 2019, 9:34 a.m. UTC | #2
On 01.11.2019 17:25 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 01.11.2019 10:37, Tuguoyi wrote:
> > There are two issues in In check_constraints_on_bitmap(),
> > 1) The sanity check on the granularity will cause uint64_t integer
> > left-shift overflow when cluster_size is 2M and the granularity is
> > BIGGER than 32K.
> > 2) The way to calculate image size that the maximum bitmap supported
> > can map to is a bit incorrect.
> > This patch fix it by add a helper function to calculate the number of
> > bytes needed by a normal bitmap in image and compare it to the maximum
> > bitmap bytes supported by qemu.
> >
> > Fixes: 5f72826e7fc62167cf3a
> > Signed-off-by: Guoyi Tu <tu.guoyi@h3c.com>
> 
> You forget my
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

Sorry for that, it's my first time to submit patch to qemu, and should I send another patch or not ?

> (I don't see changes except add "Fixes: " to commit msg and put
> get_bitmap_bytes_needed definition header into one line.)

Yes, Only minor changes are made, including removing 'inline' keyword.

Thanks for your patience in reviewing

> > ---
> >   block/qcow2-bitmap.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> >   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/qcow2-bitmap.c b/block/qcow2-bitmap.c index
> > 98294a7..ef9ef62 100644
> > --- a/block/qcow2-bitmap.c
> > +++ b/block/qcow2-bitmap.c
> > @@ -142,6 +142,13 @@ static int check_table_entry(uint64_t entry, int
> cluster_size)
> >       return 0;
> >   }
> >
> > +static int64_t get_bitmap_bytes_needed(int64_t len, uint32_t
> > +granularity) {
> > +    int64_t num_bits = DIV_ROUND_UP(len, granularity);
> > +
> > +    return DIV_ROUND_UP(num_bits, 8); }
> > +
> >   static int check_constraints_on_bitmap(BlockDriverState *bs,
> >                                          const char *name,
> >                                          uint32_t granularity, @@
> > -150,6 +157,7 @@ static int check_constraints_on_bitmap(BlockDriverState
> *bs,
> >       BDRVQcow2State *s = bs->opaque;
> >       int granularity_bits = ctz32(granularity);
> >       int64_t len = bdrv_getlength(bs);
> > +    int64_t bitmap_bytes;
> >
> >       assert(granularity > 0);
> >       assert((granularity & (granularity - 1)) == 0); @@ -171,9 +179,9
> > @@ static int check_constraints_on_bitmap(BlockDriverState *bs,
> >           return -EINVAL;
> >       }
> >
> > -    if ((len > (uint64_t)BME_MAX_PHYS_SIZE << granularity_bits) ||
> > -        (len > (uint64_t)BME_MAX_TABLE_SIZE * s->cluster_size <<
> > -               granularity_bits))
> > +    bitmap_bytes = get_bitmap_bytes_needed(len, granularity);
> > +    if ((bitmap_bytes > (uint64_t)BME_MAX_PHYS_SIZE) ||
> > +        (bitmap_bytes > (uint64_t)BME_MAX_TABLE_SIZE *
> > + s->cluster_size))
> >       {
> >           error_setg(errp, "Too much space will be occupied by the
> bitmap. "
> >                      "Use larger granularity");
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> Vladimir
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Nov. 1, 2019, 10:09 a.m. UTC | #3
01.11.2019 12:34, Tuguoyi wrote:
> On 01.11.2019 17:25 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> 01.11.2019 10:37, Tuguoyi wrote:
>>> There are two issues in In check_constraints_on_bitmap(),
>>> 1) The sanity check on the granularity will cause uint64_t integer
>>> left-shift overflow when cluster_size is 2M and the granularity is
>>> BIGGER than 32K.
>>> 2) The way to calculate image size that the maximum bitmap supported
>>> can map to is a bit incorrect.
>>> This patch fix it by add a helper function to calculate the number of
>>> bytes needed by a normal bitmap in image and compare it to the maximum
>>> bitmap bytes supported by qemu.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 5f72826e7fc62167cf3a
>>> Signed-off-by: Guoyi Tu <tu.guoyi@h3c.com>
>>
>> You forget my
>> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
> 
> Sorry for that, it's my first time to submit patch to qemu, and should I send another patch or not ?

Good start!

No, you shouldn't. Maintainer will take such marks (and may be other proposed
improvements for commit message like this "Fixes: ", when applying, so no reason to resend.

Also, when sending a new version of patch, summarize what was changed since previous version
(you may do it under "---" which follows commit message, or in cover letter if it's
a patch set with several patches.

> 
>> (I don't see changes except add "Fixes: " to commit msg and put
>> get_bitmap_bytes_needed definition header into one line.)
> 
> Yes, Only minor changes are made, including removing 'inline' keyword.
> 
> Thanks for your patience in reviewing >
>>> ---
>>>    block/qcow2-bitmap.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>>>    1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/block/qcow2-bitmap.c b/block/qcow2-bitmap.c index
>>> 98294a7..ef9ef62 100644
>>> --- a/block/qcow2-bitmap.c
>>> +++ b/block/qcow2-bitmap.c
>>> @@ -142,6 +142,13 @@ static int check_table_entry(uint64_t entry, int
>> cluster_size)
>>>        return 0;
>>>    }
>>>
>>> +static int64_t get_bitmap_bytes_needed(int64_t len, uint32_t
>>> +granularity) {
>>> +    int64_t num_bits = DIV_ROUND_UP(len, granularity);
>>> +
>>> +    return DIV_ROUND_UP(num_bits, 8); }
>>> +
>>>    static int check_constraints_on_bitmap(BlockDriverState *bs,
>>>                                           const char *name,
>>>                                           uint32_t granularity, @@
>>> -150,6 +157,7 @@ static int check_constraints_on_bitmap(BlockDriverState
>> *bs,
>>>        BDRVQcow2State *s = bs->opaque;
>>>        int granularity_bits = ctz32(granularity);
>>>        int64_t len = bdrv_getlength(bs);
>>> +    int64_t bitmap_bytes;
>>>
>>>        assert(granularity > 0);
>>>        assert((granularity & (granularity - 1)) == 0); @@ -171,9 +179,9
>>> @@ static int check_constraints_on_bitmap(BlockDriverState *bs,
>>>            return -EINVAL;
>>>        }
>>>
>>> -    if ((len > (uint64_t)BME_MAX_PHYS_SIZE << granularity_bits) ||
>>> -        (len > (uint64_t)BME_MAX_TABLE_SIZE * s->cluster_size <<
>>> -               granularity_bits))
>>> +    bitmap_bytes = get_bitmap_bytes_needed(len, granularity);
>>> +    if ((bitmap_bytes > (uint64_t)BME_MAX_PHYS_SIZE) ||
>>> +        (bitmap_bytes > (uint64_t)BME_MAX_TABLE_SIZE *
>>> + s->cluster_size))
>>>        {
>>>            error_setg(errp, "Too much space will be occupied by the
>> bitmap. "
>>>                       "Use larger granularity");
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Vladimir
Tuguoyi Nov. 2, 2019, 2:27 a.m. UTC | #4
On 01.11.2019 18:09, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 01.11.2019 12:34, Tuguoyi wrote:
> > On 01.11.2019 17:25 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> >> 01.11.2019 10:37, Tuguoyi wrote:
> >>> There are two issues in In check_constraints_on_bitmap(),
> >>> 1) The sanity check on the granularity will cause uint64_t integer
> >>> left-shift overflow when cluster_size is 2M and the granularity is
> >>> BIGGER than 32K.
> >>> 2) The way to calculate image size that the maximum bitmap supported
> >>> can map to is a bit incorrect.
> >>> This patch fix it by add a helper function to calculate the number
> >>> of bytes needed by a normal bitmap in image and compare it to the
> >>> maximum bitmap bytes supported by qemu.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 5f72826e7fc62167cf3a
> >>> Signed-off-by: Guoyi Tu <tu.guoyi@h3c.com>
> >>
> >> You forget my
> >> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
> >
> > Sorry for that, it's my first time to submit patch to qemu, and should I send
> another patch or not ?
> 
> Good start!
> 
> No, you shouldn't. Maintainer will take such marks (and may be other
> proposed improvements for commit message like this "Fixes: ", when applying,
> so no reason to resend.
> 
> Also, when sending a new version of patch, summarize what was changed
> since previous version (you may do it under "---" which follows commit
> message, or in cover letter if it's a patch set with several patches.

OK, I got it, thanks a lot. 

> >
> >> (I don't see changes except add "Fixes: " to commit msg and put
> >> get_bitmap_bytes_needed definition header into one line.)
> >
> > Yes, Only minor changes are made, including removing 'inline' keyword.
> >
> > Thanks for your patience in reviewing >
> >>> ---
> >>>    block/qcow2-bitmap.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> >>>    1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/block/qcow2-bitmap.c b/block/qcow2-bitmap.c index
> >>> 98294a7..ef9ef62 100644
> >>> --- a/block/qcow2-bitmap.c
> >>> +++ b/block/qcow2-bitmap.c
> >>> @@ -142,6 +142,13 @@ static int check_table_entry(uint64_t entry,
> >>> int
> >> cluster_size)
> >>>        return 0;
> >>>    }
> >>>
> >>> +static int64_t get_bitmap_bytes_needed(int64_t len, uint32_t
> >>> +granularity) {
> >>> +    int64_t num_bits = DIV_ROUND_UP(len, granularity);
> >>> +
> >>> +    return DIV_ROUND_UP(num_bits, 8); }
> >>> +
> >>>    static int check_constraints_on_bitmap(BlockDriverState *bs,
> >>>                                           const char *name,
> >>>                                           uint32_t granularity,
> @@
> >>> -150,6 +157,7 @@ static int
> >>> check_constraints_on_bitmap(BlockDriverState
> >> *bs,
> >>>        BDRVQcow2State *s = bs->opaque;
> >>>        int granularity_bits = ctz32(granularity);
> >>>        int64_t len = bdrv_getlength(bs);
> >>> +    int64_t bitmap_bytes;
> >>>
> >>>        assert(granularity > 0);
> >>>        assert((granularity & (granularity - 1)) == 0); @@ -171,9
> >>> +179,9 @@ static int check_constraints_on_bitmap(BlockDriverState *bs,
> >>>            return -EINVAL;
> >>>        }
> >>>
> >>> -    if ((len > (uint64_t)BME_MAX_PHYS_SIZE << granularity_bits) ||
> >>> -        (len > (uint64_t)BME_MAX_TABLE_SIZE * s->cluster_size <<
> >>> -               granularity_bits))
> >>> +    bitmap_bytes = get_bitmap_bytes_needed(len, granularity);
> >>> +    if ((bitmap_bytes > (uint64_t)BME_MAX_PHYS_SIZE) ||
> >>> +        (bitmap_bytes > (uint64_t)BME_MAX_TABLE_SIZE *
> >>> + s->cluster_size))
> >>>        {
> >>>            error_setg(errp, "Too much space will be occupied by the
> >> bitmap. "
> >>>                       "Use larger granularity");
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >> Vladimir
> 
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> Vladimir
Max Reitz Nov. 5, 2019, 4:24 p.m. UTC | #5
On 01.11.19 08:37, Tuguoyi wrote:
> There are two issues in In check_constraints_on_bitmap(),
> 1) The sanity check on the granularity will cause uint64_t
> integer left-shift overflow when cluster_size is 2M and the
> granularity is BIGGER than 32K.
> 2) The way to calculate image size that the maximum bitmap
> supported can map to is a bit incorrect.
> This patch fix it by add a helper function to calculate the
> number of bytes needed by a normal bitmap in image and compare
> it to the maximum bitmap bytes supported by qemu.
> 
> Fixes: 5f72826e7fc62167cf3a
> Signed-off-by: Guoyi Tu <tu.guoyi@h3c.com>
> ---
>  block/qcow2-bitmap.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Thanks, applied to my block branch:

https://git.xanclic.moe/XanClic/qemu/commits/branch/block

Max
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/block/qcow2-bitmap.c b/block/qcow2-bitmap.c
index 98294a7..ef9ef62 100644
--- a/block/qcow2-bitmap.c
+++ b/block/qcow2-bitmap.c
@@ -142,6 +142,13 @@  static int check_table_entry(uint64_t entry, int cluster_size)
     return 0;
 }
 
+static int64_t get_bitmap_bytes_needed(int64_t len, uint32_t granularity)
+{
+    int64_t num_bits = DIV_ROUND_UP(len, granularity);
+
+    return DIV_ROUND_UP(num_bits, 8);
+}
+
 static int check_constraints_on_bitmap(BlockDriverState *bs,
                                        const char *name,
                                        uint32_t granularity,
@@ -150,6 +157,7 @@  static int check_constraints_on_bitmap(BlockDriverState *bs,
     BDRVQcow2State *s = bs->opaque;
     int granularity_bits = ctz32(granularity);
     int64_t len = bdrv_getlength(bs);
+    int64_t bitmap_bytes;
 
     assert(granularity > 0);
     assert((granularity & (granularity - 1)) == 0);
@@ -171,9 +179,9 @@  static int check_constraints_on_bitmap(BlockDriverState *bs,
         return -EINVAL;
     }
 
-    if ((len > (uint64_t)BME_MAX_PHYS_SIZE << granularity_bits) ||
-        (len > (uint64_t)BME_MAX_TABLE_SIZE * s->cluster_size <<
-               granularity_bits))
+    bitmap_bytes = get_bitmap_bytes_needed(len, granularity);
+    if ((bitmap_bytes > (uint64_t)BME_MAX_PHYS_SIZE) ||
+        (bitmap_bytes > (uint64_t)BME_MAX_TABLE_SIZE * s->cluster_size))
     {
         error_setg(errp, "Too much space will be occupied by the bitmap. "
                    "Use larger granularity");