[v2,2/2] Btrfs: make tree checker detect checksum items with overlapping ranges
diff mbox series

Message ID 20191202110103.20456-1-fdmanana@kernel.org
State New
Headers show
Series
  • [v2,1/2] Btrfs: fix missing data checksums after replaying a log tree
Related show

Commit Message

Filipe Manana Dec. 2, 2019, 11:01 a.m. UTC
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

Having checksum items, either on the checksums tree or in a log tree, that
represent ranges that overlap each other is a sign of a corruption. Such
case confuses the checksum lookup code and can result in not being able to
find checksums or find stale checksums.

So add a check for such case.

This is motivated by a recent fix for a case where a log tree had checksum
items covering ranges that overlap each other due to extent cloning, and
resulted in missing checksums after replaying the log tree. It also helps
detect past issues such as stale and outdated checksums due to overlapping,
commit 27b9a8122ff71a ("Btrfs: fix csum tree corruption, duplicate and
outdated checksums").

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
---

V2: No changes from v1. Only first patch in the series changed.

 fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

David Sterba Dec. 3, 2019, 7:11 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 11:01:03AM +0000, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> 
> Having checksum items, either on the checksums tree or in a log tree, that
> represent ranges that overlap each other is a sign of a corruption. Such
> case confuses the checksum lookup code and can result in not being able to
> find checksums or find stale checksums.
> 
> So add a check for such case.
> 
> This is motivated by a recent fix for a case where a log tree had checksum
> items covering ranges that overlap each other due to extent cloning, and
> resulted in missing checksums after replaying the log tree. It also helps
> detect past issues such as stale and outdated checksums due to overlapping,
> commit 27b9a8122ff71a ("Btrfs: fix csum tree corruption, duplicate and
> outdated checksums").
> 
> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

Added to misc-next, thanks.

Patch
diff mbox series

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
index 092b8ece36d7..97f3520b8d98 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@  static int check_extent_data_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
 }
 
 static int check_csum_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf, struct btrfs_key *key,
-			   int slot)
+			   int slot, struct btrfs_key *prev_key)
 {
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = leaf->fs_info;
 	u32 sectorsize = fs_info->sectorsize;
@@ -356,6 +356,20 @@  static int check_csum_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf, struct btrfs_key *key,
 			btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot), csumsize);
 		return -EUCLEAN;
 	}
+	if (slot > 0 && prev_key->type == BTRFS_EXTENT_CSUM_KEY) {
+		u64 prev_csum_end;
+		u32 prev_item_size;
+
+		prev_item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot - 1);
+		prev_csum_end = (prev_item_size / csumsize) * sectorsize;
+		prev_csum_end += prev_key->offset;
+		if (prev_csum_end > key->offset) {
+			generic_err(leaf, slot - 1,
+"csum end range (%llu) goes beyond the start range (%llu) of the next csum item",
+				    prev_csum_end, key->offset);
+			return -EUCLEAN;
+		}
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1355,7 +1369,7 @@  static int check_leaf_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
 		ret = check_extent_data_item(leaf, key, slot, prev_key);
 		break;
 	case BTRFS_EXTENT_CSUM_KEY:
-		ret = check_csum_item(leaf, key, slot);
+		ret = check_csum_item(leaf, key, slot, prev_key);
 		break;
 	case BTRFS_DIR_ITEM_KEY:
 	case BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY: