| Message ID | 20200102180433.25688-1-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [OSSTEST] Switch to linux-4.19 by default (from 4.14) | expand |
On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 06:04:33PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > This affects only x86 and only the branches that aren't linux-*, since > obviously the latter use whatever version they are using. > > I compared the most recent linux-4.19 results with the most recent > linux-4.14 ones, and there was only one new failure (in 143841): > test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 12 guest-start/redhat.repeat fail REGR. vs. 143911 > > This step has failed twice in the web-visible history of this job on > 4.19; and once recently in 4.14. Because of the low update rate of > these trees nowadays, these tests are a while ago and we don't have > the logs any more. > > I think given that it's already not perfect this is not a blocker and > we should update osstest to 4.14. > > CC: Roger Pau Monné <royger@FreeBSD.org> > CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> > CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> > CC: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> > CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> > CC: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com> > Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> With this we could start adding pvh dom0 jobs :) Thanks, Roger.
On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 06:04:33PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > This affects only x86 and only the branches that aren't linux-*, since > obviously the latter use whatever version they are using. > > I compared the most recent linux-4.19 results with the most recent > linux-4.14 ones, and there was only one new failure (in 143841): > test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 12 guest-start/redhat.repeat fail REGR. vs. 143911 > > This step has failed twice in the web-visible history of this job on > 4.19; and once recently in 4.14. Because of the low update rate of > these trees nowadays, these tests are a while ago and we don't have > the logs any more. > > I think given that it's already not perfect this is not a blocker and > we should update osstest to 4.14. > > CC: Roger Pau Monné <royger@FreeBSD.org> > CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> > CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> > CC: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> > CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> > CC: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com> > Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> Acked-by: Wei Liu <wl@xen.org> On a related note, the most recent Linux LTS is 5.4. It would be great if we start testing it in OSSTest and eventually switch to it. Wei.
On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 06:04:33PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > This affects only x86 and only the branches that aren't linux-*, since > obviously the latter use whatever version they are using. > > I compared the most recent linux-4.19 results with the most recent > linux-4.14 ones, and there was only one new failure (in 143841): > test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 12 guest-start/redhat.repeat fail REGR. vs. 143911 > > This step has failed twice in the web-visible history of this job on > 4.19; and once recently in 4.14. Because of the low update rate of > these trees nowadays, these tests are a while ago and we don't have > the logs any more. > > I think given that it's already not perfect this is not a blocker and > we should update osstest to 4.14. > ^^^^ Just a small note: typo? Shouldn't that be 4.19 ? -- Pasi
Pasi Kärkkäinen writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH] Switch to linux-4.19 by default (from 4.14)"):
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 06:04:33PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I think given that it's already not perfect this is not a blocker and
> > we should update osstest to 4.14.
> > ^^^^
>
> Just a small note: typo? Shouldn't that be 4.19 ?
Yes, well spotted. The actual code is right, luckily.
Thanks,
Ian.
diff --git a/ap-common b/ap-common index 6ae7cce6..547b48ed 100644 --- a/ap-common +++ b/ap-common @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ : ${PUSH_TREE_LINUX:=$XENBITS:/home/xen/git/linux-pvops.git} : ${BASE_TREE_LINUX:=git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git} -: ${BASE_TAG_LINUX:=tested/linux-4.14} +: ${BASE_TAG_LINUX:=tested/linux-4.19} : ${BASE_TAG_LINUX_ARM:=tested/linux-arm-xen} if [ "x${TREE_LINUX}" = x ]; then
This affects only x86 and only the branches that aren't linux-*, since obviously the latter use whatever version they are using. I compared the most recent linux-4.19 results with the most recent linux-4.14 ones, and there was only one new failure (in 143841): test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 12 guest-start/redhat.repeat fail REGR. vs. 143911 This step has failed twice in the web-visible history of this job on 4.19; and once recently in 4.14. Because of the low update rate of these trees nowadays, these tests are a while ago and we don't have the logs any more. I think given that it's already not perfect this is not a blocker and we should update osstest to 4.14. CC: Roger Pau Monné <royger@FreeBSD.org> CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> CC: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> CC: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com> Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> --- ap-common | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)