[1/3] selftests/x86: Build with LDFLAGS and LDLIBS
diff mbox series

Message ID 20200117165330.17015-1-daniel.diaz@linaro.org
State New
Headers show
Series
  • [1/3] selftests/x86: Build with LDFLAGS and LDLIBS
Related show

Commit Message

Daniel Díaz Jan. 17, 2020, 4:53 p.m. UTC
During cross-compilation, it was discovered that LDFLAGS and
LDLIBS were not being used while building binaries, leading
to defaults which were not necessarily correct.

OpenEmbedded reported this kind of problem:
  ERROR: QA Issue: No GNU_HASH in the ELF binary [...], didn't pass LDFLAGS?

Signed-off-by: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Thomas Gleixner Jan. 17, 2020, 5:12 p.m. UTC | #1
Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org> writes:

> During cross-compilation, it was discovered that LDFLAGS and
> LDLIBS were not being used while building binaries, leading
> to defaults which were not necessarily correct.
>
> OpenEmbedded reported this kind of problem:
>   ERROR: QA Issue: No GNU_HASH in the ELF binary [...], didn't pass LDFLAGS?
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>

Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Patch
diff mbox series

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile
index 5d49bfec1e9a..f8360454eafd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile
@@ -71,10 +71,10 @@  all_64: $(BINARIES_64)
 EXTRA_CLEAN := $(BINARIES_32) $(BINARIES_64)
 
 $(BINARIES_32): $(OUTPUT)/%_32: %.c
-	$(CC) -m32 -o $@ $(CFLAGS) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) $^ -lrt -ldl -lm
+	$(CC) -m32 -o $@ $(CFLAGS) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $^ $(LDLIBS) -lrt -ldl -lm
 
 $(BINARIES_64): $(OUTPUT)/%_64: %.c
-	$(CC) -m64 -o $@ $(CFLAGS) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) $^ -lrt -ldl
+	$(CC) -m64 -o $@ $(CFLAGS) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $^ $(LDLIBS) -lrt -ldl
 
 # x86_64 users should be encouraged to install 32-bit libraries
 ifeq ($(CAN_BUILD_I386)$(CAN_BUILD_X86_64),01)