diff mbox series

[04/20] ARM: aspeed: Drop unneeded select of HAVE_SMP

Message ID 20200121103722.1781-4-geert+renesas@glider.be (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series ARM: Drop unneeded select of multi-platform selected options | expand

Commit Message

Geert Uytterhoeven Jan. 21, 2020, 10:37 a.m. UTC
Support for the 6th generation Aspeed SoCs depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7.
As the latter selects HAVE_SMP, there is no need for MACH_ASPEED_G6 to
select HAVE_SMP.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Cc: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
---
All patches in this series are independent of each other.
Cover letter at https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200121103413.1337-1-geert+renesas@glider.be

 arch/arm/mach-aspeed/Kconfig | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Andrew Jeffery Jan. 28, 2020, 1:05 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020, at 21:07, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Support for the 6th generation Aspeed SoCs depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7.
> As the latter selects HAVE_SMP, there is no need for MACH_ASPEED_G6 to
> select HAVE_SMP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> Cc: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
> Cc: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Joel Stanley Jan. 31, 2020, 3:50 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 01:05, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2020, at 21:07, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Support for the 6th generation Aspeed SoCs depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7.
> > As the latter selects HAVE_SMP, there is no need for MACH_ASPEED_G6 to
> > select HAVE_SMP.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> > Cc: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
> > Cc: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>

Acked-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>

Geert, did you intend for these to be picked up by Arnd and Olof?
Geert Uytterhoeven Jan. 31, 2020, 8:13 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Joel,

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 4:50 AM Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 01:05, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Jan 2020, at 21:07, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Support for the 6th generation Aspeed SoCs depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7.
> > > As the latter selects HAVE_SMP, there is no need for MACH_ASPEED_G6 to
> > > select HAVE_SMP.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> > > Cc: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
> > > Cc: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
>
> Acked-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
>
> Geert, did you intend for these to be picked up by Arnd and Olof?

Feel free to pick it up.
I'll resend the remaining patches to the arm-soc maintainers later.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-aspeed/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-aspeed/Kconfig
index e8d6e9957d65b717..ea96d11b850241ce 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-aspeed/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-aspeed/Kconfig
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@  config MACH_ASPEED_G6
 	select PINCTRL_ASPEED_G6
 	select ARM_GIC
 	select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
-	select HAVE_SMP
 	help
 	 Say yes if you intend to run on an Aspeed ast2600 or similar
 	 sixth generation Aspeed BMCs.