[12/12] xfs: fix xfs_buf_ioerror_alert location reporting
diff mbox series

Message ID 157976538741.2388944.8089997383572416484.stgit@magnolia
State Superseded
Headers show
Series
  • xfs: make buffer functions return error codes
Related show

Commit Message

Darrick J. Wong Jan. 23, 2020, 7:43 a.m. UTC
From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

Instead of passing __func__ to the error reporting function, let's use
the return address builtins so that the messages actually tell you which
higher level function called the buffer functions.  This was previously
true for the xfs_buf_read callers, but not for the xfs_trans_read_buf
callers.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c         |   12 +++++++-----
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h         |    7 ++++---
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c    |    2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c |    4 ++--
 fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c   |    5 +++--
 5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Comments

Dave Chinner Jan. 24, 2020, 2:07 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:43:07PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> 
> Instead of passing __func__ to the error reporting function, let's use
> the return address builtins so that the messages actually tell you which
> higher level function called the buffer functions.  This was previously
> true for the xfs_buf_read callers, but not for the xfs_trans_read_buf
> callers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c         |   12 +++++++-----
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h         |    7 ++++---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c    |    2 +-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c |    4 ++--
>  fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c   |    5 +++--
>  5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Makes sense, but I have a concern that this series now has added two
new parameters to the buffer read functions. Perhaps we should consider
wrapping this all up in an args structure? That's a separate piece
of work, not for this patchset.

So far this patch,

Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Darrick J. Wong Jan. 24, 2020, 4:21 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 01:07:27PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:43:07PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > 
> > Instead of passing __func__ to the error reporting function, let's use
> > the return address builtins so that the messages actually tell you which
> > higher level function called the buffer functions.  This was previously
> > true for the xfs_buf_read callers, but not for the xfs_trans_read_buf
> > callers.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c         |   12 +++++++-----
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h         |    7 ++++---
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c    |    2 +-
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c |    4 ++--
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c   |    5 +++--
> >  5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> Makes sense, but I have a concern that this series now has added two
> new parameters to the buffer read functions. Perhaps we should consider
> wrapping this all up in an args structure?

Yes.  Next cycle I'll try to cough up a patchset to turn this into an
args structure so that callers can pass additional things like health
reporting breadcrumbs to the verifiers so that we can update that status
without having to explode a ton of error handling boilerplate all over
the place.

--D

> That's a separate piece
> of work, not for this patchset.
> 
> So far this patch,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com

Patch
diff mbox series

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
index b420e865b32e..217e4f82a44a 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
@@ -803,7 +803,8 @@  xfs_buf_read_map(
 	int			nmaps,
 	xfs_buf_flags_t		flags,
 	struct xfs_buf		**bpp,
-	const struct xfs_buf_ops *ops)
+	const struct xfs_buf_ops *ops,
+	xfs_failaddr_t		fa)
 {
 	struct xfs_buf		*bp;
 	int			error;
@@ -852,7 +853,7 @@  xfs_buf_read_map(
 	 */
 	if (error) {
 		if (!XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(target->bt_mount))
-			xfs_buf_ioerror_alert(bp, __func__);
+			xfs_buf_ioerror_alert(bp, fa);
 
 		bp->b_flags &= ~XBF_DONE;
 		xfs_buf_stale(bp);
@@ -885,7 +886,8 @@  xfs_buf_readahead_map(
 		return;
 
 	xfs_buf_read_map(target, map, nmaps,
-		     XBF_TRYLOCK | XBF_ASYNC | XBF_READ_AHEAD, &bp, ops);
+		     XBF_TRYLOCK | XBF_ASYNC | XBF_READ_AHEAD, &bp, ops,
+		     __this_address);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1234,10 +1236,10 @@  __xfs_buf_ioerror(
 void
 xfs_buf_ioerror_alert(
 	struct xfs_buf		*bp,
-	const char		*func)
+	xfs_failaddr_t		func)
 {
 	xfs_alert(bp->b_mount,
-"metadata I/O error in \"%s\" at daddr 0x%llx len %d error %d",
+"metadata I/O error in \"%pS\" at daddr 0x%llx len %d error %d",
 			func, (uint64_t)XFS_BUF_ADDR(bp), bp->b_length,
 			-bp->b_error);
 }
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
index d1908a5038a2..567ec2c24244 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@  int xfs_buf_get_map(struct xfs_buftarg *target, struct xfs_buf_map *map,
 		int nmaps, xfs_buf_flags_t flags, struct xfs_buf **bpp);
 int xfs_buf_read_map(struct xfs_buftarg *target, struct xfs_buf_map *map,
 		int nmaps, xfs_buf_flags_t flags, struct xfs_buf **bpp,
-		const struct xfs_buf_ops *ops);
+		const struct xfs_buf_ops *ops, xfs_failaddr_t fa);
 void xfs_buf_readahead_map(struct xfs_buftarg *target, struct xfs_buf_map *map,
 		int nmaps, const struct xfs_buf_ops *ops);
 
@@ -223,7 +223,8 @@  xfs_buf_read(
 {
 	DEFINE_SINGLE_BUF_MAP(map, blkno, numblks);
 
-	return xfs_buf_read_map(target, &map, 1, flags, bpp, ops);
+	return xfs_buf_read_map(target, &map, 1, flags, bpp, ops,
+			__builtin_return_address(0));
 }
 
 static inline void
@@ -260,7 +261,7 @@  extern void xfs_buf_ioend(struct xfs_buf *bp);
 extern void __xfs_buf_ioerror(struct xfs_buf *bp, int error,
 		xfs_failaddr_t failaddr);
 #define xfs_buf_ioerror(bp, err) __xfs_buf_ioerror((bp), (err), __this_address)
-extern void xfs_buf_ioerror_alert(struct xfs_buf *, const char *func);
+extern void xfs_buf_ioerror_alert(struct xfs_buf *bp, xfs_failaddr_t fa);
 
 extern int __xfs_buf_submit(struct xfs_buf *bp, bool);
 static inline int xfs_buf_submit(struct xfs_buf *bp)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
index 5be8973a452c..663810e6cd59 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
@@ -1113,7 +1113,7 @@  xfs_buf_iodone_callback_error(
 	if (bp->b_target != lasttarg ||
 	    time_after(jiffies, (lasttime + 5*HZ))) {
 		lasttime = jiffies;
-		xfs_buf_ioerror_alert(bp, __func__);
+		xfs_buf_ioerror_alert(bp, __this_address);
 	}
 	lasttarg = bp->b_target;
 
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
index ac79537d3275..25cfc85dbaa7 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@  xlog_recover_iodone(
 		 * this during recovery. One strike!
 		 */
 		if (!XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(bp->b_mount)) {
-			xfs_buf_ioerror_alert(bp, __func__);
+			xfs_buf_ioerror_alert(bp, __this_address);
 			xfs_force_shutdown(bp->b_mount, SHUTDOWN_META_IO_ERROR);
 		}
 	}
@@ -5627,7 +5627,7 @@  xlog_do_recover(
 	error = xfs_buf_submit(bp);
 	if (error) {
 		if (!XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp)) {
-			xfs_buf_ioerror_alert(bp, __func__);
+			xfs_buf_ioerror_alert(bp, __this_address);
 			ASSERT(0);
 		}
 		xfs_buf_relse(bp);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
index 449be0f8c10f..2ffa401ebcc6 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@  xfs_trans_read_buf_map(
 		ASSERT(bp->b_ops != NULL);
 		error = xfs_buf_reverify(bp, ops);
 		if (error) {
-			xfs_buf_ioerror_alert(bp, __func__);
+			xfs_buf_ioerror_alert(bp, __return_address);
 
 			if (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_DIRTY)
 				xfs_force_shutdown(tp->t_mountp,
@@ -302,7 +302,8 @@  xfs_trans_read_buf_map(
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	error = xfs_buf_read_map(target, map, nmaps, flags, &bp, ops);
+	error = xfs_buf_read_map(target, map, nmaps, flags, &bp, ops,
+			__return_address);
 	switch (error) {
 	case 0:
 		break;