[v3,1/3] clk: rockchip: convert rk3399 pll type to use readl_poll_timeout
diff mbox series

Message ID 20200129163821.1547295-1-heiko@sntech.de
State New
Headers show
Series
  • [v3,1/3] clk: rockchip: convert rk3399 pll type to use readl_poll_timeout
Related show

Commit Message

Heiko Stübner Jan. 29, 2020, 4:38 p.m. UTC
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>

Instead of open coding the polling of the lock status, use the
handy readl_poll_timeout for this. As the pll locking is normally
blazingly fast and we don't want to incur additional delays, we're
not doing any sleeps similar to for example the imx clk-pllv4
and define a very safe but still short timeout of 1ms.

Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
---
changes in v3:
- switch to readl_relaxed_poll_timeout to keep original behaviour
changes in v2:
- add patch to keep rk3399 wait_lock similar to the rest

 drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Comments

Stephen Boyd Jan. 30, 2020, 5:19 p.m. UTC | #1
Quoting Heiko Stuebner (2020-01-29 08:38:19)
> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
> 
> Instead of open coding the polling of the lock status, use the
> handy readl_poll_timeout for this. As the pll locking is normally
> blazingly fast and we don't want to incur additional delays, we're
> not doing any sleeps similar to for example the imx clk-pllv4
> and define a very safe but still short timeout of 1ms.
> 
> Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Heiko Stübner Feb. 12, 2020, 12:04 p.m. UTC | #2
Am Mittwoch, 29. Januar 2020, 17:38:19 CET schrieb Heiko Stuebner:
> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
> 
> Instead of open coding the polling of the lock status, use the
> handy readl_poll_timeout for this. As the pll locking is normally
> blazingly fast and we don't want to incur additional delays, we're
> not doing any sleeps similar to for example the imx clk-pllv4
> and define a very safe but still short timeout of 1ms.
> 
> Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>

applied all 3 for 5.7 with Stephen's Review

Patch
diff mbox series

diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
index 198417d56300..6fd52895e7b6 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
@@ -585,19 +585,20 @@  static const struct clk_ops rockchip_rk3066_pll_clk_ops = {
 static int rockchip_rk3399_pll_wait_lock(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll)
 {
 	u32 pllcon;
-	int delay = 24000000;
+	int ret;
 
-	/* poll check the lock status in rk3399 xPLLCON2 */
-	while (delay > 0) {
-		pllcon = readl_relaxed(pll->reg_base + RK3399_PLLCON(2));
-		if (pllcon & RK3399_PLLCON2_LOCK_STATUS)
-			return 0;
+	/*
+	 * Lock time typical 250, max 500 input clock cycles @24MHz
+	 * So define a very safe maximum of 1000us, meaning 24000 cycles.
+	 */
+	ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(pll->reg_base + RK3399_PLLCON(2),
+					 pllcon,
+					 pllcon & RK3399_PLLCON2_LOCK_STATUS,
+					 0, 1000);
+	if (ret)
+		pr_err("%s: timeout waiting for pll to lock\n", __func__);
 
-		delay--;
-	}
-
-	pr_err("%s: timeout waiting for pll to lock\n", __func__);
-	return -ETIMEDOUT;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static void rockchip_rk3399_pll_get_params(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll,