From patchwork Fri Feb 14 23:28:41 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Valdis_Kl_=C4=93_tnieks?= X-Patchwork-Id: 11383525 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF47813A4 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 23:28:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F722086A for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 23:28:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728384AbgBNX2u (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 18:28:50 -0500 Received: from outbound.smtp.vt.edu ([198.82.183.121]:57518 "EHLO omr1.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727976AbgBNX2u (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 18:28:50 -0500 Received: from mr6.cc.vt.edu (mr6.cc.vt.edu [IPv6:2607:b400:92:8500:0:af:2d00:4488]) by omr1.cc.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 01ENSnfC013382 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 18:28:49 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f197.google.com (mail-qt1-f197.google.com [209.85.160.197]) by mr6.cc.vt.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 01ENShi2024866 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 18:28:49 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f197.google.com with SMTP id k27so6948954qtu.12 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 15:28:49 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:date:message-id; bh=vINktuQgp+PRYkidQo2UTOSF0ZZjvGjPM2QLr9Gqgms=; b=CPMCaBtT8hONjG+xPUt8M3zkldF4WLFc5Tpqb8VLyU0zum68fnJzH3Hqh3fnBOQvtZ S8G9Xd/vuPezemS3vWf98HrzS+BQO3xn4EK5Z7M8Myp7rzDT3EyML4t8JQFd9UD4PjYK YgrJrC3DE12Xwn/GIw5oE6llQCy0r3Gm6TJLaswmd9DxGRkOP4uxaAMJcpaim7u0iJ1R TF4JSn6iZLG8Ds3yf99doJqZKRDAPmiTS45wtExHh0F+3k61HN4YxlaBpyU8i3azHnp5 u+qXL4zD+eqoTpdJxrPyQcKpRNTPAkPLilcc5ShaenHG+xsw2OYBH7703Z22VGKm2Z1K p5cA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVoAVfR/2T+rDERyHMUJS67DRPiypJxj7u1R/BzYR+iEmmWvy5P zoYAZB39Z4Ue0XOTbGjFFPXS6MUVKqN3XRG4Nj0Jb/XuCByWj6ou09z7CZA75OQ0bcszeVh7BjA GEEIYqydkUYqeMtbz7o7Z+3czXTkPcKG478JB X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7b9a:: with SMTP id p26mr4569753qtu.281.1581722923727; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 15:28:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyCMAu3tbJMuGYjLKFMmp41nmTLTE48ratNYze090QXvU8CiiTs4aAMLRW0ldADjsw9582KWw== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7b9a:: with SMTP id p26mr4569744qtu.281.1581722923426; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 15:28:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from turing-police ([2601:5c0:c001:c9e1::359]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b7sm4211541qtj.78.2020.02.14.15.28.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 15:28:42 -0800 (PST) From: "Valdis =?utf-8?q?Kl=C4=93tnieks?= " X-Google-Original-From: "Valdis =?utf-8?q?Kl=C4=93tnieks?= " X-Mailer: exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 with nmh-1.7+dev To: Namjae Jeon , Sasha Levin Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hch@lst.de, sj1557.seo@samsung.com, pali.rohar@gmail.com, arnd@arndb.de, namjae.jeon@samsung.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Subject: [PATCH] exfat: tighten down num_fats check Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 18:28:41 -0500 Message-ID: <89603.1581722921@turing-police> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Change the test for num_fats from != 0 to a check for specifically 1. Although it's theoretically possible that num_fats == 2 for a TexFAT volume (or an implementation that doesn't do the full TexFAT but does support 2 FAT tables), the rest of the code doesn't currently DTRT if it's 2 (in particular, not handling the case of ActiveFat pointing at the second FAT area), so we'll disallow that as well, as well as dealing with corrupted images that have a trash non-zero value. Signed-off-by: Valdis Kletnieks --- a/fs/exfat/super.c 2020-02-14 17:45:02.262274632 -0500 +++ b/fs/exfat/super.c 2020-02-14 17:46:37.200343723 -0500 @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int __exfat_fill_super(struct sup } p_bpb = (struct pbr64 *)p_pbr; - if (!p_bpb->bsx.num_fats) { + if (p_bpb->bsx.num_fats != 1) { exfat_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "bogus number of FAT structure"); ret = -EINVAL; goto free_bh;