diff mbox series

[18/24] drm/i915/selftests: Wait for the kernel context switch

Message ID 20200228082330.2411941-18-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [01/24] drm/i915/gt: Check engine-is-awake on reset later | expand

Commit Message

Chris Wilson Feb. 28, 2020, 8:23 a.m. UTC
As we require a context switch to ensure that the current context is
switched out and saved to memory, perform an explicit switch to the
kernel context and wait for it.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Mika Kuoppala Feb. 28, 2020, 3:09 p.m. UTC | #1
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> As we require a context switch to ensure that the current context is
> switched out and saved to memory, perform an explicit switch to the
> kernel context and wait for it.

The patch subject is not incorrect. Just feels that the kernel
context is a patsy in here.

So I would s/kernel// on subject but keep in commit msg

>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> index d7f98aada626..95da6b880e3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> @@ -4015,6 +4015,31 @@ static int emit_semaphore_signal(struct intel_context *ce, void *slot)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int context_sync(struct intel_context *ce)
> +{
> +	struct i915_request *rq;
> +	struct dma_fence *fence;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	rq = intel_engine_create_kernel_request(ce->engine);
> +	if (IS_ERR(rq))
> +		return PTR_ERR(rq);
> +
> +	fence = i915_active_fence_get(&ce->timeline->last_request);
> +	if (fence) {
> +		i915_request_await_dma_fence(rq, fence);
> +		dma_fence_put(fence);
> +	}
> +
> +	rq = i915_request_get(rq);
> +	i915_request_add(rq);
> +	if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 2) < 0)
> +		err = -ETIME;
> +	i915_request_put(rq);
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
>  static int live_lrc_layout(void *arg)
>  {
>  	struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
> @@ -4638,16 +4663,10 @@ static int __lrc_timestamp(const struct lrc_timestamp *arg, bool preempt)
>  		wmb();
>  	}
>  
> -	if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 2) < 0) {
> -		err = -ETIME;
> -		goto err;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* and wait for switch to kernel */
> -	if (igt_flush_test(arg->engine->i915)) {
> -		err = -EIO;
> +	/* and wait for switch to kernel (to save our context to memory) */
> +	err = context_sync(arg->ce[0]);
> +	if (err)
>  		goto err;
> -	}
>  
>  	rmb();

For me the context_sync could be context_flush and it would
allow the rmb() to be snuck inside.

But I seem to gravitate towards lower resolution and
apparently you prefer to be more fine grained and
explicit on callsites so,

Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>

>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
Chris Wilson Feb. 28, 2020, 3:14 p.m. UTC | #2
Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2020-02-28 15:09:28)
> Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> 
> > As we require a context switch to ensure that the current context is
> > switched out and saved to memory, perform an explicit switch to the
> > kernel context and wait for it.
> 
> The patch subject is not incorrect. Just feels that the kernel
> context is a patsy in here.
> 
> So I would s/kernel// on subject but keep in commit msg
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> > index d7f98aada626..95da6b880e3f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> > @@ -4015,6 +4015,31 @@ static int emit_semaphore_signal(struct intel_context *ce, void *slot)
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int context_sync(struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > +     struct i915_request *rq;
> > +     struct dma_fence *fence;
> > +     int err = 0;
> > +
> > +     rq = intel_engine_create_kernel_request(ce->engine);
> > +     if (IS_ERR(rq))
> > +             return PTR_ERR(rq);
> > +
> > +     fence = i915_active_fence_get(&ce->timeline->last_request);
> > +     if (fence) {
> > +             i915_request_await_dma_fence(rq, fence);
> > +             dma_fence_put(fence);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     rq = i915_request_get(rq);
> > +     i915_request_add(rq);
> > +     if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 2) < 0)
> > +             err = -ETIME;
> > +     i915_request_put(rq);
> > +
> > +     return err;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int live_lrc_layout(void *arg)
> >  {
> >       struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
> > @@ -4638,16 +4663,10 @@ static int __lrc_timestamp(const struct lrc_timestamp *arg, bool preempt)
> >               wmb();
> >       }
> >  
> > -     if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 2) < 0) {
> > -             err = -ETIME;
> > -             goto err;
> > -     }
> > -
> > -     /* and wait for switch to kernel */
> > -     if (igt_flush_test(arg->engine->i915)) {
> > -             err = -EIO;
> > +     /* and wait for switch to kernel (to save our context to memory) */
> > +     err = context_sync(arg->ce[0]);
> > +     if (err)
> >               goto err;
> > -     }
> >  
> >       rmb();
> 
> For me the context_sync could be context_flush and it would
> allow the rmb() to be snuck inside.

I hear you. The rmb() is really associated with the action of confirming
the switch and can justifiably be inside the context_sync/flush.

The rmb is just there to placate inner daemons, so I didn't think about
it when forcing the emission of the kernel request.
-Chris
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
index d7f98aada626..95da6b880e3f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
@@ -4015,6 +4015,31 @@  static int emit_semaphore_signal(struct intel_context *ce, void *slot)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int context_sync(struct intel_context *ce)
+{
+	struct i915_request *rq;
+	struct dma_fence *fence;
+	int err = 0;
+
+	rq = intel_engine_create_kernel_request(ce->engine);
+	if (IS_ERR(rq))
+		return PTR_ERR(rq);
+
+	fence = i915_active_fence_get(&ce->timeline->last_request);
+	if (fence) {
+		i915_request_await_dma_fence(rq, fence);
+		dma_fence_put(fence);
+	}
+
+	rq = i915_request_get(rq);
+	i915_request_add(rq);
+	if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 2) < 0)
+		err = -ETIME;
+	i915_request_put(rq);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
 static int live_lrc_layout(void *arg)
 {
 	struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
@@ -4638,16 +4663,10 @@  static int __lrc_timestamp(const struct lrc_timestamp *arg, bool preempt)
 		wmb();
 	}
 
-	if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 2) < 0) {
-		err = -ETIME;
-		goto err;
-	}
-
-	/* and wait for switch to kernel */
-	if (igt_flush_test(arg->engine->i915)) {
-		err = -EIO;
+	/* and wait for switch to kernel (to save our context to memory) */
+	err = context_sync(arg->ce[0]);
+	if (err)
 		goto err;
-	}
 
 	rmb();