| Message ID | 20200318081837.23983-1-anshuman.gupta@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v3] drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel powered off | expand |
On Wed, 18 Mar 2020, Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> wrote: > Few edp panels like Sharp is triggering short and long > hpd pulse after panel is getting powered off. > Currently driver is already ignoring long pulse for eDP > panel but in order to process the short pulse, it turns on > the VDD which requires panel power_cycle_delay + panel_power_on_delay > these delay on Sharp panel introduced the responsiveness overhead > of 800ms in the modeset sequence and as well is in suspend > sequence. > Ignoring any short pulse if panel is powered off. > > FIXME: It requires to wait for panel_power_off delay in order > to check the panel power status due to pps_lock because panel triggers > short pulse immediately after writing PP_OFF to PP_CTRL register and > wait_panel_off waits for panel_power_off delay with pps_lock held. > This still creates responsiveness overhead of panel_power_off delay. > > v2: > - checking vdd along with panel power to ignore the hpd. [Jani,Ville] > v3: > - safer side check to ignore the long hpd when eDP have power, > adding type of hpd to debug log. [Jani] > > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> Thanks, Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > index 0a417cd2af2b..38e74195101a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > @@ -6763,19 +6763,34 @@ static const struct drm_encoder_funcs intel_dp_enc_funcs = { > .destroy = intel_dp_encoder_destroy, > }; > > +static bool intel_edp_have_power(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > +{ > + intel_wakeref_t wakeref; > + bool have_power = false; > + > + with_pps_lock(intel_dp, wakeref) { > + have_power = edp_have_panel_power(intel_dp) && > + edp_have_panel_vdd(intel_dp); > + } > + > + return have_power; > +} > + > enum irqreturn > intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port, bool long_hpd) > { > struct intel_dp *intel_dp = &intel_dig_port->dp; > > - if (long_hpd && intel_dig_port->base.type == INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP) { > + if (intel_dig_port->base.type == INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP && > + (long_hpd || !intel_edp_have_power(intel_dp))) { > /* > - * vdd off can generate a long pulse on eDP which > + * vdd off can generate a long/short pulse on eDP which > * would require vdd on to handle it, and thus we > * would end up in an endless cycle of > - * "vdd off -> long hpd -> vdd on -> detect -> vdd off -> ..." > + * "vdd off -> long/short hpd -> vdd on -> detect -> vdd off -> ..." > */ > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("ignoring long hpd on eDP [ENCODER:%d:%s]\n", > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("ignoring %s hpd on eDP [ENCODER:%d:%s]\n", > + long_hpd ? "long" : "short", > intel_dig_port->base.base.base.id, > intel_dig_port->base.base.name); > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Jani Nikula > Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 3:09 PM > To: Gupta, Anshuman <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>; intel- > gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel > powered off > > On Wed, 18 Mar 2020, Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> wrote: > > Few edp panels like Sharp is triggering short and long hpd pulse after > > panel is getting powered off. > > Currently driver is already ignoring long pulse for eDP panel but in > > order to process the short pulse, it turns on the VDD which requires > > panel power_cycle_delay + panel_power_on_delay these delay on Sharp > > panel introduced the responsiveness overhead of 800ms in the modeset > > sequence and as well is in suspend sequence. > > Ignoring any short pulse if panel is powered off. > > > > FIXME: It requires to wait for panel_power_off delay in order to check > > the panel power status due to pps_lock because panel triggers short > > pulse immediately after writing PP_OFF to PP_CTRL register and > > wait_panel_off waits for panel_power_off delay with pps_lock held. > > This still creates responsiveness overhead of panel_power_off delay. > > > > v2: > > - checking vdd along with panel power to ignore the hpd. [Jani,Ville] > > v3: > > - safer side check to ignore the long hpd when eDP have power, > > adding type of hpd to debug log. [Jani] > > > > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> > > Thanks, > > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Pushed to dinq, thanks for the patch and review. Regards, Uma Shankar > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > > index 0a417cd2af2b..38e74195101a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > > @@ -6763,19 +6763,34 @@ static const struct drm_encoder_funcs > intel_dp_enc_funcs = { > > .destroy = intel_dp_encoder_destroy, }; > > > > +static bool intel_edp_have_power(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) { > > + intel_wakeref_t wakeref; > > + bool have_power = false; > > + > > + with_pps_lock(intel_dp, wakeref) { > > + have_power = edp_have_panel_power(intel_dp) && > > + edp_have_panel_vdd(intel_dp); > > + } > > + > > + return have_power; > > +} > > + > > enum irqreturn > > intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port, bool > > long_hpd) { > > struct intel_dp *intel_dp = &intel_dig_port->dp; > > > > - if (long_hpd && intel_dig_port->base.type == INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP) { > > + if (intel_dig_port->base.type == INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP && > > + (long_hpd || !intel_edp_have_power(intel_dp))) { > > /* > > - * vdd off can generate a long pulse on eDP which > > + * vdd off can generate a long/short pulse on eDP which > > * would require vdd on to handle it, and thus we > > * would end up in an endless cycle of > > - * "vdd off -> long hpd -> vdd on -> detect -> vdd off -> ..." > > + * "vdd off -> long/short hpd -> vdd on -> detect -> vdd off -> ..." > > */ > > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("ignoring long hpd on eDP > [ENCODER:%d:%s]\n", > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("ignoring %s hpd on eDP [ENCODER:%d:%s]\n", > > + long_hpd ? "long" : "short", > > intel_dig_port->base.base.base.id, > > intel_dig_port->base.base.name); > > return IRQ_HANDLED; > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c index 0a417cd2af2b..38e74195101a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c @@ -6763,19 +6763,34 @@ static const struct drm_encoder_funcs intel_dp_enc_funcs = { .destroy = intel_dp_encoder_destroy, }; +static bool intel_edp_have_power(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) +{ + intel_wakeref_t wakeref; + bool have_power = false; + + with_pps_lock(intel_dp, wakeref) { + have_power = edp_have_panel_power(intel_dp) && + edp_have_panel_vdd(intel_dp); + } + + return have_power; +} + enum irqreturn intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port, bool long_hpd) { struct intel_dp *intel_dp = &intel_dig_port->dp; - if (long_hpd && intel_dig_port->base.type == INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP) { + if (intel_dig_port->base.type == INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP && + (long_hpd || !intel_edp_have_power(intel_dp))) { /* - * vdd off can generate a long pulse on eDP which + * vdd off can generate a long/short pulse on eDP which * would require vdd on to handle it, and thus we * would end up in an endless cycle of - * "vdd off -> long hpd -> vdd on -> detect -> vdd off -> ..." + * "vdd off -> long/short hpd -> vdd on -> detect -> vdd off -> ..." */ - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("ignoring long hpd on eDP [ENCODER:%d:%s]\n", + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("ignoring %s hpd on eDP [ENCODER:%d:%s]\n", + long_hpd ? "long" : "short", intel_dig_port->base.base.base.id, intel_dig_port->base.base.name); return IRQ_HANDLED;
Few edp panels like Sharp is triggering short and long hpd pulse after panel is getting powered off. Currently driver is already ignoring long pulse for eDP panel but in order to process the short pulse, it turns on the VDD which requires panel power_cycle_delay + panel_power_on_delay these delay on Sharp panel introduced the responsiveness overhead of 800ms in the modeset sequence and as well is in suspend sequence. Ignoring any short pulse if panel is powered off. FIXME: It requires to wait for panel_power_off delay in order to check the panel power status due to pps_lock because panel triggers short pulse immediately after writing PP_OFF to PP_CTRL register and wait_panel_off waits for panel_power_off delay with pps_lock held. This still creates responsiveness overhead of panel_power_off delay. v2: - checking vdd along with panel power to ignore the hpd. [Jani,Ville] v3: - safer side check to ignore the long hpd when eDP have power, adding type of hpd to debug log. [Jani] Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)