From patchwork Tue Mar 24 20:08:49 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Petr Vorel X-Patchwork-Id: 11456289 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD72139A for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:09:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B6820409 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:09:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727662AbgCXUJE (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:09:04 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50336 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725866AbgCXUJD (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:09:03 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD49ACCA; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:09:02 +0000 (UTC) From: Petr Vorel To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: Petr Vorel , Olga Kornievskaia , Anna Schumaker , Trond Myklebust , "J . Bruce Fields" , Chuck Lever Subject: [PATCH 1/1] NFS: Don't specify NFS version in "UDP not supported" error Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:08:49 +0100 Message-Id: <20200324200849.5331-1-pvorel@suse.cz> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org UDP was originally disabled in 6da1a034362f for NFSv4. Later in b24ee6c64ca7 UDP is by default disabled by NFS_DISABLE_UDP_SUPPORT=y for all NFS versions. Therefore remove v4 from error message. Fixes: b24ee6c64ca7 ("NFS: allow deprecation of NFS UDP protocol") Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel --- Hi, although on NFS_DISABLE_UDP_SUPPORT=n it might be confusing that version is not specified, IMHO it's less confusing than "NFSv4" for NFSv3. But if you like I can distinguish these two cases. Kind regards, Petr fs/nfs/fs_context.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/fs_context.c b/fs/nfs/fs_context.c index e113fcb4bb4c..566dd59570e6 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/fs_context.c +++ b/fs/nfs/fs_context.c @@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@ static int nfs4_parse_monolithic(struct fs_context *fc, return nfs_invalf(fc, "NFS4: mount program didn't pass remote address"); out_invalid_transport_udp: - return nfs_invalf(fc, "NFSv4: Unsupported transport protocol udp"); + return nfs_invalf(fc, "NFS: Unsupported transport protocol udp"); } #endif @@ -1257,7 +1257,7 @@ static int nfs_fs_context_validate(struct fs_context *fc) nfs_errorf(fc, "NFS: NFSv4 is not compiled into kernel"); return -EPROTONOSUPPORT; out_invalid_transport_udp: - return nfs_invalf(fc, "NFSv4: Unsupported transport protocol udp"); + return nfs_invalf(fc, "NFS: Unsupported transport protocol udp"); out_no_address: return nfs_invalf(fc, "NFS: mount program didn't pass remote address"); out_mountproto_mismatch: