| Message ID | 20200330231617.17079-5-digetx@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Changes Requested, archived |
| Delegated to: | Chanwoo Choi |
| Headers | show |
| Series | NVIDIA Tegra devfreq drivers improvements | expand |
On 3/31/20 8:16 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > The clk_round_rate() doesn't work for us properly if clock rate is bounded > by a min/max rate that is requested by some other clk-user because we're > building devfreq's OPP table based on the rounding. > > In particular this becomes a problem if display driver is probed earlier > than devfreq, and thus, display adds a memory bandwidth request using > interconnect API, which results in a minimum clock-rate being set for > the memory clk. In a result, the lowest devfreq OPP rate is getting > limited to the minimum rate imposed by the display driver. > > Let's use new clk_round_rate_unboundly() that resolves the problem by > rounding clock rate without taking into account min/max limits imposed by > active clk users. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c > index 28b2c7ca416e..34f6291e880c 100644 > --- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c > @@ -834,7 +834,7 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > reset_control_deassert(tegra->reset); > > - rate = clk_round_rate(tegra->emc_clock, ULONG_MAX); > + rate = clk_round_rate_unboundly(tegra->emc_clock, ULONG_MAX); > if (rate < 0) { > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to round clock rate: %ld\n", rate); > return rate; > @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > } > > for (rate = 0; rate <= tegra->max_freq * KHZ; rate++) { > - rate = clk_round_rate(tegra->emc_clock, rate); > + rate = clk_round_rate_unboundly(tegra->emc_clock, rate); > > if (rate < 0) { > dev_err(&pdev->dev, > Firstly, patch2 have to be reviewed for this patch. I have no any objection. It looks good to me. If patch1 get the confirmation from clock maintainer, feel free to add my acked tag: Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
On 4/1/20 8:22 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > On 3/31/20 8:16 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> The clk_round_rate() doesn't work for us properly if clock rate is bounded >> by a min/max rate that is requested by some other clk-user because we're >> building devfreq's OPP table based on the rounding. >> >> In particular this becomes a problem if display driver is probed earlier >> than devfreq, and thus, display adds a memory bandwidth request using >> interconnect API, which results in a minimum clock-rate being set for >> the memory clk. In a result, the lowest devfreq OPP rate is getting >> limited to the minimum rate imposed by the display driver. >> >> Let's use new clk_round_rate_unboundly() that resolves the problem by >> rounding clock rate without taking into account min/max limits imposed by >> active clk users. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> >> --- >> drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c >> index 28b2c7ca416e..34f6291e880c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c >> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c >> @@ -834,7 +834,7 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> >> reset_control_deassert(tegra->reset); >> >> - rate = clk_round_rate(tegra->emc_clock, ULONG_MAX); >> + rate = clk_round_rate_unboundly(tegra->emc_clock, ULONG_MAX); >> if (rate < 0) { >> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to round clock rate: %ld\n", rate); >> return rate; >> @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> } >> >> for (rate = 0; rate <= tegra->max_freq * KHZ; rate++) { >> - rate = clk_round_rate(tegra->emc_clock, rate); >> + rate = clk_round_rate_unboundly(tegra->emc_clock, rate); >> >> if (rate < 0) { >> dev_err(&pdev->dev, >> > > Firstly, patch2 have to be reviewed for this patch. > I have no any objection. It looks good to me. > > If patch1 get the confirmation from clock maintainer, Sorry. I mean the patch2 about clk_round_rate_unboundly() function. instead of patch1. > feel free to add my acked tag: > Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> > >
diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c index 28b2c7ca416e..34f6291e880c 100644 --- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c +++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c @@ -834,7 +834,7 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) reset_control_deassert(tegra->reset); - rate = clk_round_rate(tegra->emc_clock, ULONG_MAX); + rate = clk_round_rate_unboundly(tegra->emc_clock, ULONG_MAX); if (rate < 0) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to round clock rate: %ld\n", rate); return rate; @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } for (rate = 0; rate <= tegra->max_freq * KHZ; rate++) { - rate = clk_round_rate(tegra->emc_clock, rate); + rate = clk_round_rate_unboundly(tegra->emc_clock, rate); if (rate < 0) { dev_err(&pdev->dev,
The clk_round_rate() doesn't work for us properly if clock rate is bounded by a min/max rate that is requested by some other clk-user because we're building devfreq's OPP table based on the rounding. In particular this becomes a problem if display driver is probed earlier than devfreq, and thus, display adds a memory bandwidth request using interconnect API, which results in a minimum clock-rate being set for the memory clk. In a result, the lowest devfreq OPP rate is getting limited to the minimum rate imposed by the display driver. Let's use new clk_round_rate_unboundly() that resolves the problem by rounding clock rate without taking into account min/max limits imposed by active clk users. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> --- drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)