selftests/vm/keys: fix a broken reference at protection_keys.c
diff mbox series

Message ID d478a2fc5d204691d0cac6e2b416f0e07a26d3d9.1588585390.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org
State Accepted
Headers show
Series
  • selftests/vm/keys: fix a broken reference at protection_keys.c
Related show

Commit Message

Mauro Carvalho Chehab May 4, 2020, 9:44 a.m. UTC
Changeset 1eecbcdca2bd ("docs: move protection-keys.rst to the core-api book")
from Jun 7, 2019 converted protection-keys.txt file to ReST.

A recent change at protection_keys.c partially reverted such
changeset, causing it to point to a non-existing file:

	- * Tests x86 Memory Protection Keys (see Documentation/core-api/protection-keys.rst)
	+ * Tests Memory Protection Keys (see Documentation/vm/protection-keys.txt)

It sounds to me that the changeset that introduced such change
4645e3563673 ("selftests/vm/pkeys: rename all references to pkru to a generic name")
could also have other side effects, as it sounds that it was not
generated against uptream code, but, instead, against a version
older than Jun 7, 2019.

Fixes: 4645e3563673 ("selftests/vm/pkeys: rename all references to pkru to a generic name")
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Dave Hansen May 4, 2020, 2:10 p.m. UTC | #1
On 5/4/20 2:44 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Changeset 1eecbcdca2bd ("docs: move protection-keys.rst to the core-api book")
> from Jun 7, 2019 converted protection-keys.txt file to ReST.
> 
> A recent change at protection_keys.c partially reverted such
> changeset, causing it to point to a non-existing file:
> 
> 	- * Tests x86 Memory Protection Keys (see Documentation/core-api/protection-keys.rst)
> 	+ * Tests Memory Protection Keys (see Documentation/vm/protection-keys.txt)
> 
> It sounds to me that the changeset that introduced such change
> 4645e3563673 ("selftests/vm/pkeys: rename all references to pkru to a generic name")
> could also have other side effects, as it sounds that it was not
> generated against uptream code, but, instead, against a version
> older than Jun 7, 2019.
> 
> Fixes: 4645e3563673 ("selftests/vm/pkeys: rename all references to pkru to a generic name")
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

Thanks for finding this!  The patch set which moved protection-keys.txt
out of x86 code probably just missed this when it got rebased.  It
originated well before June 2019, iirc.

Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Sandipan Das May 4, 2020, 2:38 p.m. UTC | #2
On 04/05/20 7:40 pm, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 5/4/20 2:44 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Changeset 1eecbcdca2bd ("docs: move protection-keys.rst to the core-api book")
>> from Jun 7, 2019 converted protection-keys.txt file to ReST.
>>
>> A recent change at protection_keys.c partially reverted such
>> changeset, causing it to point to a non-existing file:
>>
>> 	- * Tests x86 Memory Protection Keys (see Documentation/core-api/protection-keys.rst)
>> 	+ * Tests Memory Protection Keys (see Documentation/vm/protection-keys.txt)
>>
>> It sounds to me that the changeset that introduced such change
>> 4645e3563673 ("selftests/vm/pkeys: rename all references to pkru to a generic name")
>> could also have other side effects, as it sounds that it was not
>> generated against uptream code, but, instead, against a version
>> older than Jun 7, 2019.
>>
>> Fixes: 4645e3563673 ("selftests/vm/pkeys: rename all references to pkru to a generic name")
>> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
> 
> Thanks for finding this!  The patch set which moved protection-keys.txt
> out of x86 code probably just missed this when it got rebased.  It
> originated well before June 2019, iirc.
> 

That's right. Sorry about that. Must have missed it when rebasing the
older pkey selftest patches. Thanks for fixing this Mauro.

Acked-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
shuah May 8, 2020, 3:54 p.m. UTC | #3
On 5/4/20 8:38 AM, Sandipan Das wrote:
> 
> 
> On 04/05/20 7:40 pm, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> On 5/4/20 2:44 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Changeset 1eecbcdca2bd ("docs: move protection-keys.rst to the core-api book")

checkpatch doesn't like this commit description.

ERROR: Please use git commit description style 'commit <12+ chars of 
sha1> ("<title line>")' - ie: 'commit 1eecbcdca2bd ("docs: move 
protection-keys.rst to the core-api book")'
#72:
Changeset 1eecbcdca2bd ("docs: move protection-keys.rst to the core-api 
book")

>>> from Jun 7, 2019 converted protection-keys.txt file to ReST.
>>>
>>> A recent change at protection_keys.c partially reverted such
>>> changeset, causing it to point to a non-existing file:
>>>
>>> 	- * Tests x86 Memory Protection Keys (see Documentation/core-api/protection-keys.rst)
>>> 	+ * Tests Memory Protection Keys (see Documentation/vm/protection-keys.txt)
>>>
>>> It sounds to me that the changeset that introduced such change
>>> 4645e3563673 ("selftests/vm/pkeys: rename all references to pkru to a generic name")
>>> could also have other side effects, as it sounds that it was not
>>> generated against uptream code, but, instead, against a version
>>> older than Jun 7, 2019.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 4645e3563673 ("selftests/vm/pkeys: rename all references to pkru to a generic name")

WARNING: Unknown commit id '4645e3563673', maybe rebased or not pulled?
#87:
Fixes: 4645e3563673 ("selftests/vm/pkeys: rename all references to pkru 
to a generic name")

This commit didn't land in Linux 5.7-rc4 yet looks like. Probably in mm
or doc tree and has dependency on it?

Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

Patch
diff mbox series

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
index fc19addcb5c8..fdbb602ecf32 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ 
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 /*
- * Tests Memory Protection Keys (see Documentation/vm/protection-keys.txt)
+ * Tests Memory Protection Keys (see Documentation/core-api/protection-keys.rst)
  *
  * There are examples in here of:
  *  * how to set protection keys on memory