| Message ID | 20200504225227.464666-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Introduce Rocket Lake | expand |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Matt > Roper > Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 4:22 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: De Marchi, Lucas <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/22] x86/gpu: add RKL stolen memory support > > RKL re-uses the same stolen memory registers as TGL and ICL. > > Bspec: 52055 > Bspec: 49589 > Bspec: 49636 > Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Confirmed with Spec. Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c > index 2f9ec14be3b1..a4b5af03dcc1 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c > @@ -550,6 +550,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id intel_early_ids[] > __initconst = { > INTEL_ICL_11_IDS(&gen11_early_ops), > INTEL_EHL_IDS(&gen11_early_ops), > INTEL_TGL_12_IDS(&gen11_early_ops), > + INTEL_RKL_IDS(&gen11_early_ops), > }; > > struct resource intel_graphics_stolen_res __ro_after_init = > DEFINE_RES_MEM(0, 0); > -- > 2.24.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Cc'ing x86@kernel.org and maintainers On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 4:52 AM Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Matt > > Roper > > Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 4:22 AM > > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > Cc: De Marchi, Lucas <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> > > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/22] x86/gpu: add RKL stolen memory support > > > > RKL re-uses the same stolen memory registers as TGL and ICL. > > > > Bspec: 52055 > > Bspec: 49589 > > Bspec: 49636 > > Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> > > Confirmed with Spec. > Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> > > > --- > > arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c > > index 2f9ec14be3b1..a4b5af03dcc1 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c > > @@ -550,6 +550,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id intel_early_ids[] > > __initconst = { > > INTEL_ICL_11_IDS(&gen11_early_ops), > > INTEL_EHL_IDS(&gen11_early_ops), > > INTEL_TGL_12_IDS(&gen11_early_ops), > > + INTEL_RKL_IDS(&gen11_early_ops), Trying to apply to drm-intel-next-queued checkpatch rightfully complain: 35aad4f58736 (HEAD -> drm-intel-next-queued) x86/gpu: add RKL stolen memory support The following files are outside of i915 maintenance scope: arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c Can we get an ack? Going forward, for simple changes like this, do you prefer to still ack on it or should we just apply to our tree? thanks Lucas De Marchi > > }; > > > > struct resource intel_graphics_stolen_res __ro_after_init = > > DEFINE_RES_MEM(0, 0); > > -- > > 2.24.1 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 04:57:27PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > The following files are outside of i915 maintenance scope: > arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c > > Can we get an ack? Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> > Going forward, for simple changes like this, do you prefer to still > ack on it or should we just apply to our tree? Well, we are very quickly to give an ACK for trivial stuff like that if we get CCed upfront on the patch. It keeps us aware of what's being changed outside of tip. Thx.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c index 2f9ec14be3b1..a4b5af03dcc1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c @@ -550,6 +550,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id intel_early_ids[] __initconst = { INTEL_ICL_11_IDS(&gen11_early_ops), INTEL_EHL_IDS(&gen11_early_ops), INTEL_TGL_12_IDS(&gen11_early_ops), + INTEL_RKL_IDS(&gen11_early_ops), }; struct resource intel_graphics_stolen_res __ro_after_init = DEFINE_RES_MEM(0, 0);
RKL re-uses the same stolen memory registers as TGL and ICL. Bspec: 52055 Bspec: 49589 Bspec: 49636 Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> --- arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)