@@ -4131,6 +4131,9 @@ static void bdw_get_trans_port_sync_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
enum intel_display_power_domain power_domain;
intel_wakeref_t trans_wakeref;
+ if (!HAS_TRANSCODER(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder))
+ continue;
+
power_domain = POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER(cpu_transcoder);
trans_wakeref = intel_display_power_get_if_enabled(dev_priv,
power_domain);
@@ -2849,6 +2849,9 @@ static void gen11_display_irq_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
for (trans = TRANSCODER_A; trans <= TRANSCODER_D; trans++) {
enum intel_display_power_domain domain;
+ if (!HAS_TRANSCODER(dev_priv, trans))
+ continue;
+
domain = POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER(trans);
if (!intel_display_power_is_enabled(dev_priv, domain))
continue;
@@ -3397,6 +3400,9 @@ static void gen8_de_irq_postinstall(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
for (trans = TRANSCODER_A; trans <= TRANSCODER_D; trans++) {
enum intel_display_power_domain domain;
+ if (!HAS_TRANSCODER(dev_priv, trans))
+ continue;
+
domain = POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER(trans);
if (!intel_display_power_is_enabled(dev_priv, domain))
continue;
There are a couple places in our driver that loop over transcoders A..D for gen11+; since RKL only has three pipes/transcoders, this can lead to unclaimed register reads/writes. We should add checks for transcoder existence where appropriate. v2: Move one transcoder check that wound up in the wrong function after conflict resolution. It belongs in bdw_get_trans_port_sync_config rather than bxt_get_dsi_transcoder_state. Cc: Aditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 3 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)