diff mbox series

[08/12] drm/i915/gt: Kick virtual siblings on timeslice out

Message ID 20200519063123.20673-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [01/12] drm/i915: Don't set queue-priority hint when supressing the reschedule | expand

Commit Message

Chris Wilson May 19, 2020, 6:31 a.m. UTC 
If we decide to timeslice out the current virtual request, we will
unsubmit it while it is still busy (ve->context.inflight == sibling[0]).
If the virtual tasklet and then the other sibling tasklets run before we
completely schedule out the active virtual request for the preemption,
those other tasklets will see that the virtul request is still inflight
on sibling[0] and leave it be. Therefore when we finally schedule-out
the virtual request and if we see that we have passed it back to the
virtual engine, reschedule the virtual tasklet so that it may be
resubmitted on any of the siblings.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index 8998fe1f739d..35e7ae3c049c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1405,7 +1405,7 @@  static void kick_siblings(struct i915_request *rq, struct intel_context *ce)
 	struct virtual_engine *ve = container_of(ce, typeof(*ve), context);
 	struct i915_request *next = READ_ONCE(ve->request);
 
-	if (next && next->execution_mask & ~rq->execution_mask)
+	if (next == rq || (next && next->execution_mask & ~rq->execution_mask))
 		tasklet_hi_schedule(&ve->base.execlists.tasklet);
 }