Message ID | 20200528181849.1823820-1-eblake@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi! Strange thing with your pull requests: I receive only small part of them.. I thought it's my problem of receiving part, but now I've checked that in mailing list archive there are same only two emails: 00/11 and 08/11 https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-05/msg08061.html 28.05.2020 21:18, Eric Blake wrote: > The following changes since commit a20ab81d22300cca80325c284f21eefee99aa740: > > Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/huth-gitlab/tags/pull-request-2020-05-28' into staging (2020-05-28 16:18:06 +0100) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > https://repo.or.cz/qemu/ericb.git tags/pull-bitmaps-2020-05-26-v3 > > for you to fetch changes up to cf2d1203dcfc2bf964453d83a2302231ce77f2dc: > > iotests: Add test 291 to for qemu-img bitmap coverage (2020-05-28 13:16:30 -0500) > > v3: port sed expression to BSD sed > v2: fix iotest 190 to not be as sensitive to different sparseness of > qcow2 file on various filesystems, such as FreeBSD (sending only the > changed patch) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > bitmaps patches for 2020-05-26 > > - fix non-blockdev migration of bitmaps when mirror job is in use > - add bitmap sizing to 'qemu-img measure' > - add 'qemu-img convert --bitmaps' > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Eric Blake (5): > iotests: Fix test 178 > qcow2: Expose bitmaps' size during measure > qemu-img: Factor out code for merging bitmaps > qemu-img: Add convert --bitmaps option > iotests: Add test 291 to for qemu-img bitmap coverage > > Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (6): > migration: refactor init_dirty_bitmap_migration > block/dirty-bitmap: add bdrv_has_named_bitmaps helper > migration: fix bitmaps pre-blockdev migration with mirror job > iotests: 194: test also migration of dirty bitmap > migration: add_bitmaps_to_list: check disk name once > migration: forbid bitmap migration by generated node-name > > docs/tools/qemu-img.rst | 13 +++- > qapi/block-core.json | 16 +++-- > block/qcow2.h | 2 + > include/block/dirty-bitmap.h | 1 + > block/crypto.c | 2 +- > block/dirty-bitmap.c | 13 ++++ > block/qcow2-bitmap.c | 36 ++++++++++ > block/qcow2.c | 14 +++- > block/raw-format.c | 2 +- > migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > qemu-img.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > qemu-img-cmds.hx | 4 +- > tests/qemu-iotests/178.out.qcow2 | 18 ++++- > tests/qemu-iotests/178.out.raw | 2 +- > tests/qemu-iotests/190 | 47 ++++++++++++- > tests/qemu-iotests/190.out | 27 +++++++- > tests/qemu-iotests/194 | 14 ++-- > tests/qemu-iotests/194.out | 6 ++ > tests/qemu-iotests/291 | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/qemu-iotests/291.out | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/qemu-iotests/group | 1 + > 21 files changed, 582 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-) > create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/291 > create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/291.out >
On Fri, 29 May 2020 at 06:53, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > Strange thing with your pull requests: I receive only small part of them.. I thought it's my problem of receiving part, but now I've checked that in mailing list archive there are same only two emails: 00/11 and 08/11 https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-05/msg08061.html The convention when resending a pullreq which has had to be respun with a minor fixup is to send only the coverletter and any significantly changed patches, on the basis that there's no need to spam the list with the whole set of emails again. You can see that for v1 the whole set was sent: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-05/msg07419.html thanks -- PMM
On 5/29/20 12:37 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > Hi! > > Strange thing with your pull requests: I receive only small part of > them.. I thought it's my problem of receiving part, but now I've checked > that in mailing list archive there are same only two emails: 00/11 and > 08/11 https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-05/msg08061.html It was intentional for both v2 and v3: > > 28.05.2020 21:18, Eric Blake wrote: >> >> v3: port sed expression to BSD sed >> v2: fix iotest 190 to not be as sensitive to different sparseness of >> qcow2 file on various filesystems, such as FreeBSD (sending only the >> changed patch) and I even tried to mention what I was doing, although I also see how it could have been easy to miss that buried in the middle of the cover letter.
On Thu, 28 May 2020 at 19:19, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote: > > The following changes since commit a20ab81d22300cca80325c284f21eefee99aa740: > > Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/huth-gitlab/tags/pull-request-2020-05-28' into staging (2020-05-28 16:18:06 +0100) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > https://repo.or.cz/qemu/ericb.git tags/pull-bitmaps-2020-05-26-v3 > > for you to fetch changes up to cf2d1203dcfc2bf964453d83a2302231ce77f2dc: > > iotests: Add test 291 to for qemu-img bitmap coverage (2020-05-28 13:16:30 -0500) > > v3: port sed expression to BSD sed > v2: fix iotest 190 to not be as sensitive to different sparseness of > qcow2 file on various filesystems, such as FreeBSD (sending only the > changed patch) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > bitmaps patches for 2020-05-26 > > - fix non-blockdev migration of bitmaps when mirror job is in use > - add bitmap sizing to 'qemu-img measure' > - add 'qemu-img convert --bitmaps' > Applied, thanks. Please update the changelog at https://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/5.1 for any user-visible changes. -- PMM